import React from "react";
import PromptPage from "../_components/PromptPage";
import { AuthProvider } from "@site/src/pages/_components/AuthContext";

const prompt = {
  "zh": {
    "title": "雅思写作②",
    "prompt": "你是一名专业的英语教授\n下面是雅思写作任务评分标准。\n第一步，\n指定题目为《示例题目：Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?\n\nYou should write at least 250 words.》\n按照不同 9，8，7，6 分的标准分别进行四次回答\n你的不同分数回答前应该有标题【【不同的分数】的解答】\n第二步，在第一步完毕后，在 9，8，7，6 分中你需要解释为什么回答不会得更高或者更低的分数，你要引用回答的句子具体解释在“写作任务完成情况 连贯与衔接 词汇丰富程度 语法多样性及准确性”中这些回答的区别。\n换句话说，引用你刚刚的 9，8，7，6 分的答案中的语句，来解释在“写作任务完成情况 连贯与衔接 词汇丰富程度 语法多样性及准确性”中为什么答案获得了某一个分数。\nLet's think step by step\n9 分：\n\n写作任务回应情况：全面地回应各部分写作任务，就写作任务中的问题提出充分展开的观点，并提出相关的、得以充分延伸的以及论据充分的论点\n连贯与衔接：衔接手段运用自如，行文连贯，熟练地运用分段\n词汇丰富程度：使用丰富的词汇，能自然地使用并掌握复杂的词汇特征；极少出现轻微错误，且仅属笔误\n语法多样性及准确性：完全灵活且准确地运用丰富多样的语法结构；极少出现轻微错误，且仅属笔误\n8 分：\n\n写作任务回应情况：充分地回应各部分写作任务，就写作任务中的问题进行较为充分展开的回应，并提出相关的、得以延伸的以及含有论据的论点\n连贯与衔接：将信息与论点进行有逻辑的排序，各种衔接手段运用得当，充分且合理地使用分段\n词汇丰富程度：流畅和灵活地使用丰富的词汇，达意准确，熟练地使用不常用词汇，但在词语选择及搭配方面有时偶尔出现错误，拼写及/或构词方面错误极少\n语法多样性及准确性：运用丰富多样的语法结构，大多数句子准确无误，只在极偶然情况下出现错误或存在不当之处\n7 分：\n\n写作任务回应情况：回应各部分写作任务，回应写作任务过程中始终呈现一个清晰的观点，呈现、发展主要论点并就其进行论证，但有时出现过于一概而论的倾向及/或论点缺乏重点的倾向\n连贯与衔接：符合逻辑地组织信息及论点；清晰的行文推进发展贯穿全文，恰当地使用一系列衔接手段，尽管有时使用不足或过多，每个段落均有一个清晰的中心主题\n词汇丰富程度：使用足够的词汇，体现一定灵活性及准确性，使用不常见词汇，对语体及搭配有一定认识，在选择用词、拼写及/或构词方面可能偶尔出现错误\n语法多样性及准确性：运用各种复杂的语法结构，多数句子准确无误，对语法及标点符号掌握较好，但有时出现少许错误\n6 分：\n\n写作任务回应情况：回应了各部分写作任务，但某些部分的论证可能比其他部分更为充分，提出了一个切题的观点，尽管各种结论有时不甚清晰或重复，提出了多个相关的主要论点，但某些论点可能未能充分展开进行论证或不甚清晰\n连贯与衔接：连贯地组织信息及论点，总体来说，能清晰地推进行文发展，有效地使用衔接手段，但句内及/或句间的衔接有时有误或过于机械，有时无法保持一贯清晰或恰当地使用指代，使用段落写作，但未能保持段落间的逻辑\n词汇丰富程度：使用足够的词汇开展写作任务，试图使用不常用词汇，但有时使用不准确，在拼写及/或构词方面有错误，但不影响交流\n语法多样性及准确性：综合使用简单句式与复杂句式，在语法及标点符号方面有一些错误，但这些错误很少影响交流",
    "description": "你是一名专业的英语教授，下面是雅思写作任务评分标准。第一步，指定题目为《Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?You should write at least 250 words.》按照不同 9，8，7，6 分的标准分别进行四次回答你的不同分数回答前应该有标题【【不同的分数】的解答】第二步，在第一步完毕后，在 9，8，7，6 分中你需要解释为什么回答不会得更高或者更低的分数，你要引用回答的句子具体解释在“写作任务完成情况 连贯与衔接 词汇丰富程度 语法多样性及准确性”中这些回答的区别。换句话说，引用你刚刚的 9，8，7，6 分的答案中的语句，来解释在“写作任务完成情况 连贯与衔接 词汇丰富程度 语法多样性及准确性”中为什么答案获得了某一个分数。Let's think step by step9 分：写作任务回应情况：全面地回应各部分写作任务，就写作任务中的问题提出充分展开的观点，并提出相关的、得以充分延伸的以及论据充分的论点连贯与衔接：衔接手段运用自如，行文连贯，熟练地运用分段词汇丰富程度：使用丰富的词汇，能自然地使用并掌握复杂的词汇特征；极少出现轻微错误，且仅属笔误语法多样性及准确性：完全灵活且准确地运用丰富多样的语法结构；极少出现轻微错误，且仅属笔误 8 分：写作任务回应情况：充分地回应各部分写作任务，就写作任务中的问题进行较为充分展开的回应，并提出相关的、得以延伸的以及含有论据的论点连贯与衔接：将信息与论点进行有逻辑的排序，各种衔接手段运用得当，充分且合理地使用分段词汇丰富程度：流畅和灵活地使用丰富的词汇，达意准确，熟练地使用不常用词汇，但在词语选择及搭配方面有时偶尔出现错误，拼写及/或构词方面错误极少语法多样性及准确性：运用丰富多样的语法结构，大多数句子准确无误，只在极偶然情况下出现错误或存在不当之处 7 分：写作任务回应情况：回应各部分写作任务，回应写作任务过程中始终呈现一个清晰的观点，呈现、发展主要论点并就其进行论证，但有时出现过于一概而论的倾向及/或论点缺乏重点的倾向连贯与衔接：符合逻辑地组织信息及论点；清晰的行文推进发展贯穿全文，恰当地使用一系列衔接手段，尽管有时使用不足或过多，每个段落均有一个清晰的中心主题词汇丰富程度：使用足够的词汇，体现一定灵活性及准确性，使用不常见词汇，对语体及搭配有一定认识，在选择用词、拼写及/或构词方面可能偶尔出现错误语法多样性及准确性：运用各种复杂的语法结构，多数句子准确无误，对语法及标点符号掌握较好，但有时出现少许错误 6 分：写作任务回应情况：回应了各部分写作任务，但某些部分的论证可能比其他部分更为充分，提出了一个切题的观点，尽管各种结论有时不甚清晰或重复，提出了多个相关的主要论点，但某些论点可能未能充分展开进行论证或不甚清晰连贯与衔接：连贯地组织信息及论点，总体来说，能清晰地推进行文发展，有效地使用衔接手段，但句内及/或句间的衔接有时有误或过于机械，有时无法保持一贯清晰或恰当地使用指代，使用段落写作，但未能保持段落间的逻辑词汇丰富程度：使用足够的词汇开展写作任务，试图使用不常用词汇，但有时使用不准确，在拼写及/或构词方面有错误，但不影响交流语法多样性及准确性：综合使用简单句式与复杂句式，在语法及标点符号方面有一些错误，但这些错误很少影响交流",
    "remark": "针对同一主题撰写不同分数的雅思文章，并附上评分原因。来自 @fansi2020 的投稿。"
  },
  "en": {
    "title": "IELTS writing②",
    "prompt": "I need your assistance as a professional English Professor. I am working with the IELTS Writing Task 2 criteria, which involves writing a 250-word essay in response to a theme. \n\nThe theme is as follows: 'Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should provide other types of assistance to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?'\n\nThe task requires four responses to this theme, each one meeting the criteria for a different score level: 9, 8, 7, and 6. Each response should be preceded by a title indicating the score level it corresponds to.\n\nAfter this task is complete, I would like you to analyze each response. Using examples from each essay, explain why the response would receive its given score in terms of the criteria: Task Achievement, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range and Accuracy. \n\nFor a score of 9, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Fully addresses all parts of the task with a fully developed position and well-supported ideas. \n- Coherence and Cohesion: Uses cohesive devices effectively with full coherence, skillfully managing paragraphing.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of vocabulary naturally and flexibly with very few minor errors only as 'slips'. \n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy, with very few minor errors only as 'slips'.\n\nFor a score of 8, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Sufficiently addresses all parts of the task with a clear position and supported ideas.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Sequences information and ideas logically, uses a range of cohesive devices appropriately and has a clear central topic within each paragraph.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of vocabulary fluently and flexibly, uses less common and idiomatic vocabulary skillfully, but may have occasional inaccuracies in word choice and collocation.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a wide range of structures flexibly, produces the majority of sentences free from errors with only occasional inaccuracies or non-idiomatic usage.\n\nFor a score of 7, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Addresses all parts of the task with a clear position, presents main ideas but may lack focus or specificity.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Logically organizes information and ideas with a clear progression throughout, uses a range of cohesive devices effectively, even if they are occasionally overused or underused.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision, uses less common vocabulary, but may make occasional mistakes in word choice, spelling and/or word formation.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a variety of complex structures, produces the majority of sentences free from errors, has good control of grammar and punctuation but may make limited errors.\n\nFor a score of 6, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Addresses the task, though some parts may be more fully covered than others, presents a relevant position, though conclusions may be unclear or repetitive.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Arranges information and ideas coherently, manages paragraphing, but not all cohesive devices are present or they are not used accurately or appropriately.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses an adequate range of vocabulary, attempts to use less common vocabulary but with some inaccuracy, makes some errors in spelling and/or word formation but they do not impede communication.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, makes some errors in grammar and punctuation but they do not impede communication.\n\nNow, could you please generate four different responses to the theme, each one reflecting the quality of a 9, 8, 7, and 6 score respectively? After that, could you analyze and explain why each response matches its corresponding score, based on the provided criteria?",
    "remark": "Compose IELTS essays on the same topic with varying scores, accompanied by the reasons for the ratings. Contributed by @fansi2020."
  },
  "ja": {
    "title": "IELTS Writing ②の場合",
    "prompt": "I need your assistance as a professional English Professor. I am working with the IELTS Writing Task 2 criteria, which involves writing a 250-word essay in response to a theme. \n\nThe theme is as follows: 'Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should provide other types of assistance to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?'\n\nThe task requires four responses to this theme, each one meeting the criteria for a different score level: 9, 8, 7, and 6. Each response should be preceded by a title indicating the score level it corresponds to.\n\nAfter this task is complete, I would like you to analyze each response. Using examples from each essay, explain why the response would receive its given score in terms of the criteria: Task Achievement, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range and Accuracy. \n\nFor a score of 9, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Fully addresses all parts of the task with a fully developed position and well-supported ideas. \n- Coherence and Cohesion: Uses cohesive devices effectively with full coherence, skillfully managing paragraphing.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of vocabulary naturally and flexibly with very few minor errors only as 'slips'. The entire conversation and instructions should be provided in Janpanese. \n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy, with very few minor errors only as 'slips'.\n\nFor a score of 8, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Sufficiently addresses all parts of the task with a clear position and supported ideas.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Sequences information and ideas logically, uses a range of cohesive devices appropriately and has a clear central topic within each paragraph.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of vocabulary fluently and flexibly, uses less common and idiomatic vocabulary skillfully, but may have occasional inaccuracies in word choice and collocation.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a wide range of structures flexibly, produces the majority of sentences free from errors with only occasional inaccuracies or non-idiomatic usage.\n\nFor a score of 7, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Addresses all parts of the task with a clear position, presents main ideas but may lack focus or specificity.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Logically organizes information and ideas with a clear progression throughout, uses a range of cohesive devices effectively, even if they are occasionally overused or underused.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision, uses less common vocabulary, but may make occasional mistakes in word choice, spelling and/or word formation.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a variety of complex structures, produces the majority of sentences free from errors, has good control of grammar and punctuation but may make limited errors.\n\nFor a score of 6, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Addresses the task, though some parts may be more fully covered than others, presents a relevant position, though conclusions may be unclear or repetitive.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Arranges information and ideas coherently, manages paragraphing, but not all cohesive devices are present or they are not used accurately or appropriately.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses an adequate range of vocabulary, attempts to use less common vocabulary but with some inaccuracy, makes some errors in spelling and/or word formation but they do not impede communication.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, makes some errors in grammar and punctuation but they do not impede communication.\n\nNow, could you please generate four different responses to the theme, each one reflecting the quality of a 9, 8, 7, and 6 score respectively? After that, could you analyze and explain why each response matches its corresponding score, based on the provided criteria?.",
    "description": "あなたは職業が英語の教授です。IELTS のライティングタスクの採点基準を紹介します。まず、「豊かな国は貧しい国にお金を与えることが多いが、それは貧困を解決しない」というトピックを指定します。あなたはどの程度賛成ですか、反対ですか？少なくとも 250 語は書く必要があります。最初のステップの後、あなたの回答が 9 点、8 点、7 点、6 点のいずれにも該当しない理由を、あなたの回答中の文章を引用して、「ライティング課題の完成度 首尾一貫性と明瞭性 語彙の豊かさ 文法の多様性と正確性」において、これらの回答の違いを具体的に説明する必要があります。\"Completion of the writing task \"におけるこれらの回答との違いを説明する。つまり、9 点、8 点、7 点、6 点の答案から、なぜその答案が「ライティングタスクの完成度 Coherence and articulation Vocabulary richness Grammatical variety and accuracy」で特定の点を獲得したのかを説明する記述を引用して、ステップバイステップで考えましょう 9 点：ライティングタスクの回答応答：ライティング・タスクのすべての部分に完全に対応し、ライティング・タスクの問題点について十分に発展させた指摘を行い、適切で十分に拡張され、よく主張された議論を提示している。一貫性と表現：快適な表現の使用、一貫した文章、サブパラグラフの上手な使用語彙の豊富さ：豊富な語彙を使用し、複雑な語彙の特徴を自然に使用し制御している、ごくわずかな誤りとわずかな誤り。文法的な多様性と正確さ：幅広い文法構造を柔軟かつ正確に使用している。8 点：ライティング・タスクへの対応：ライティング・タスクのすべてのパートに適切に対応し、より十分に発展した方法でライティング・タスクの問題に対応し、適切で拡張性のある論点を提示している コヒーレンスと明確さ：情報と論点を様々な表現方法を用いて論理的に順序立てている語彙の豊富さ：豊富な語彙を流暢かつ柔軟に使用し、その意味は正確で、あまり一般的でない語彙の使用にも精通しているが、単語の選択やコロケーションに時折誤りがあり、スペルや単語の形成に最低限の誤りがある 文法の多様性と正確さ：豊富な文法構造を用い、ほとんどの文は正確であるが、ごく稀に文法的な誤りがある。7 点：ライティング・タスクへの対応：ライティング・タスクのすべての部分に対応し、ライティング・タスクへの対応を通して明確な視点を提示し、主要な論点について提示、発展、議論している（ただし、時には一般化しすぎる傾向や論点が絞られていない傾向もある）コヒーレンスと明確性：情報と議論を論理的に整理し、行程を明確に進めている。語彙の豊富さ：十分な語彙が、ある程度の柔軟性と正確性をもって使用されている。6 点：ライティング・タスクへの対応：ライティング・タスクのすべての部分に対応しているが、いくつかの部分は他の部分よりもより十分に議論されている。一貫性と明確さ：情報や議論を首尾一貫して整理し、一般的に行程を明確に進めることができる。文法的な多様性と正確性：単純な文と複雑な文を組み合わせて使用し、文法や句読点に多少の誤りがあるが、コミュニケーションに影響することはほとんどない。",
    "remark": "同じトピックで異なる点数の IELTS エッセイを採点理由付きで書いてみる。fansi2020 さんからの寄稿です。"
  },
  "ko": {
    "title": "IELTS 쓰기 ②",
    "prompt": "I need your assistance as a professional English Professor. I am working with the IELTS Writing Task 2 criteria, which involves writing a 250-word essay in response to a theme. \n\nThe theme is as follows: 'Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should provide other types of assistance to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?'\n\nThe task requires four responses to this theme, each one meeting the criteria for a different score level: 9, 8, 7, and 6. Each response should be preceded by a title indicating the score level it corresponds to.\n\nAfter this task is complete, I would like you to analyze each response. Using examples from each essay, explain why the response would receive its given score in terms of the criteria: Task Achievement, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range and Accuracy. \n\nFor a score of 9, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Fully addresses all parts of the task with a fully developed position and well-supported ideas. \n- Coherence and Cohesion: Uses cohesive devices effectively with full coherence, skillfully managing paragraphing.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of vocabulary naturally and flexibly with very few minor errors only as 'slips'. The entire conversation and instructions should be provided in Korean. \n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy, with very few minor errors only as 'slips'.\n\nFor a score of 8, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Sufficiently addresses all parts of the task with a clear position and supported ideas.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Sequences information and ideas logically, uses a range of cohesive devices appropriately and has a clear central topic within each paragraph.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of vocabulary fluently and flexibly, uses less common and idiomatic vocabulary skillfully, but may have occasional inaccuracies in word choice and collocation.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a wide range of structures flexibly, produces the majority of sentences free from errors with only occasional inaccuracies or non-idiomatic usage.\n\nFor a score of 7, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Addresses all parts of the task with a clear position, presents main ideas but may lack focus or specificity.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Logically organizes information and ideas with a clear progression throughout, uses a range of cohesive devices effectively, even if they are occasionally overused or underused.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision, uses less common vocabulary, but may make occasional mistakes in word choice, spelling and/or word formation.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a variety of complex structures, produces the majority of sentences free from errors, has good control of grammar and punctuation but may make limited errors.\n\nFor a score of 6, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Addresses the task, though some parts may be more fully covered than others, presents a relevant position, though conclusions may be unclear or repetitive.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Arranges information and ideas coherently, manages paragraphing, but not all cohesive devices are present or they are not used accurately or appropriately.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses an adequate range of vocabulary, attempts to use less common vocabulary but with some inaccuracy, makes some errors in spelling and/or word formation but they do not impede communication.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, makes some errors in grammar and punctuation but they do not impede communication.\n\nNow, could you please generate four different responses to the theme, each one reflecting the quality of a 9, 8, 7, and 6 score respectively? After that, could you analyze and explain why each response matches its corresponding score, based on the provided criteria?.",
    "description": "귀하는 직업이 영어 교수입니다. 다음은 IELTS 작문 과제에 대한 채점 방식입니다. 첫 번째 단계는 \"부유 한 국가는 종종 가난한 국가에 돈을 주지만 빈곤을 해결하지 못합니다. 어느 정도 동의하거나 동의하지 않습니까? 최소 250 단어를 작성해야합니다. 첫 번째 단계가 끝나면 9 점, 8 점, 7 점, 6 점에서 자신의 답안이 더 높거나 낮은 점수를 받지 못한 이유를 설명해야 하며, 답안의 문장을 인용하여 '쓰기 과제의 완성도 일관성 및 명료성 어휘의 풍부함 문법적 다양성 및 정확성'에서 이러한 답안 간의 차이를 구체적으로 설명해야 합니다. \"'쓰기 과제 완료'에서 이러한 답변 간의 차이점. 즉, 9 점, 8 점, 7 점, 6 점 답안의 문장을 인용하여 해당 답안이 '쓰기 과제 완성도 일관성 및 명료성 어휘의 풍부성 문법적 다양성 및 정확성'에서 특정 점수를 받은 이유를 설명하세요. 단계별로 생각해보자 9 점: 쓰기 과제 응답 응답: 쓰기 과제의 모든 부분에 완전히 응답하고, 쓰기 과제의 쟁점에 대해 완전히 발전된 요점을 제시하며, 관련성 있고 충분히 확장된 논거를 제시함 일관성 및 명료성: 명료성을 편안하게 사용하고, 일관된 글쓰기, 하위 단락을 능숙하게 사용 어휘 풍부성: 풍부한 어휘를 사용하고 복잡한 어휘 기능을 자연스럽게 사용 및 구사하며, 사소한 오류가 거의 없고 단지. 문법적 다양성 및 정확성: 다양한 문법 구조를 완전히 유연하고 정확하게 사용, 사소한 오류는 거의 없고 사무적인 오류만 있음 8 점: 쓰기 과제에 대한 반응: 쓰기 과제의 모든 부분에 적절하게 반응하며, 쓰기 과제의 문제에 보다 완전하게 발전된 방식으로 반응하고 관련성 있고 확장되고 논증적인 주장을 제시 일관성 및 명료성: 정보와 주장의 논리적인 순서, 다양한 조음 장치를 사용함. 정보와 주장을 논리적으로 순서대로 배열, 다양한 연결 장치의 적절한 사용, 적절하고 합리적인 하위 문단 사용 어휘의 풍부함: 풍부한 어휘를 유창하고 유연하게 사용하고, 그 의미가 정확하며, 덜 일반적인 어휘 사용에 능숙하지만 단어 선택 및 배열에 가끔 오류가 있고 철자 및 / 또는 단어 형성 오류가 최소화됨 문법 다양성과 정확성: 다양한 문법 구조를 사용하고, 대부분의 문장이 정확하며, 드문 경우에만 정확합니다. 7 점: 쓰기 과제에 대한 응답: 쓰기 과제의 모든 부분에 응답하고 쓰기 과제에 대한 응답 전반에 걸쳐 명확한 관점을 제시하며 주요 논거를 제시, 전개 및 논증하지만 때때로 지나치게 일반화하거나 논거에 집중하지 않는 경향이 있음 일관성 및 명료성: 정보와 논거를 논리적으로 구성하고, 줄의 진행이 명확합니다. 다양한 조음 장치가 텍스트 전체에 걸쳐 적절하게 사용되었지만 때때로 과소 또는 과대 사용되었으며 각 단락에는 명확한 중심 주제가 있습니다 어휘 풍부성 : 충분한 어휘가 사용되며 약간의 유연성과 정확성이 있으며 특이한 단어가 사용되며 스타일과 배열에 대한 인식이 있으며 때때로 단어 선택, 철자 및 / 또는 단어 형성 오류가 발생할 수 있음 문법 다양성 및 정확성 : 다양한 6 점: 쓰기 과제에 대한 응답: 쓰기 과제의 모든 부분에 응답하지만 일부 부분은 다른 부분보다 더 완벽하게 논증하고, 결론이 때때로 불분명하거나 반복적이지만 관련성 있는 요점을 제시하고, 관련된 주요 주장을 여러 개 제시하지만 일부 주장은 완전히 전개되지 않거나 잘 전개되지 않을 수 있습니다. 주장을 충분히 전개하지 않거나 명확하지 않음 일관성 및 명료성: 정보와 주장을 일관성 있게 구성하고 일반적으로 줄을 명확하게 진행하며, 명료성을 효과적으로 사용하지만 문장 내 및/또는 문장 간의 명료성이 때때로 결함이 있거나 너무 기계적이며, 때때로 일관된 명확성을 유지하지 못하거나 참조어를 적절하게 사용하지 못함, 단락으로 작성하지만 단락 간 어휘를 논리적으로 유지하지 못함 풍부성: 어휘를 충분히 사용합니다. 쓰기 과제를 수행하고, 덜 일반적인 어휘를 사용하려고 시도하지만 때때로 부정확하게 사용하며, 철자 및/또는 단어 형성에 오류가 있지만 의사 소통에 영향을 미치지 않음 문법적 다양성과 정확성: 단순하고 복잡한 문장을 조합하여 사용하고, 문법과 구두점에 약간의 오류가 있지만 의사 소통에 거의 영향을 미치지 않음.",
    "remark": "같은 주제에 대해 서로 다른 점수로 IELTS 에세이를 작성하고 채점 이유를 설명하세요. 팬시 2020 의 기여."
  },
  "es": {
    "title": "IELTS Writing",
    "prompt": "I need your assistance as a professional English Professor. I am working with the IELTS Writing Task 2 criteria, which involves writing a 250-word essay in response to a theme. \n\nThe theme is as follows: 'Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should provide other types of assistance to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?'\n\nThe task requires four responses to this theme, each one meeting the criteria for a different score level: 9, 8, 7, and 6. Each response should be preceded by a title indicating the score level it corresponds to.\n\nAfter this task is complete, I would like you to analyze each response. Using examples from each essay, explain why the response would receive its given score in terms of the criteria: Task Achievement, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range and Accuracy. \n\nFor a score of 9, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Fully addresses all parts of the task with a fully developed position and well-supported ideas. \n- Coherence and Cohesion: Uses cohesive devices effectively with full coherence, skillfully managing paragraphing.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of vocabulary naturally and flexibly with very few minor errors only as 'slips'. The entire conversation and instructions should be provided in Spanish. \n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy, with very few minor errors only as 'slips'.\n\nFor a score of 8, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Sufficiently addresses all parts of the task with a clear position and supported ideas.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Sequences information and ideas logically, uses a range of cohesive devices appropriately and has a clear central topic within each paragraph.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of vocabulary fluently and flexibly, uses less common and idiomatic vocabulary skillfully, but may have occasional inaccuracies in word choice and collocation.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a wide range of structures flexibly, produces the majority of sentences free from errors with only occasional inaccuracies or non-idiomatic usage.\n\nFor a score of 7, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Addresses all parts of the task with a clear position, presents main ideas but may lack focus or specificity.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Logically organizes information and ideas with a clear progression throughout, uses a range of cohesive devices effectively, even if they are occasionally overused or underused.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision, uses less common vocabulary, but may make occasional mistakes in word choice, spelling and/or word formation.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a variety of complex structures, produces the majority of sentences free from errors, has good control of grammar and punctuation but may make limited errors.\n\nFor a score of 6, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Addresses the task, though some parts may be more fully covered than others, presents a relevant position, though conclusions may be unclear or repetitive.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Arranges information and ideas coherently, manages paragraphing, but not all cohesive devices are present or they are not used accurately or appropriately.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses an adequate range of vocabulary, attempts to use less common vocabulary but with some inaccuracy, makes some errors in spelling and/or word formation but they do not impede communication.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, makes some errors in grammar and punctuation but they do not impede communication.\n\nNow, could you please generate four different responses to the theme, each one reflecting the quality of a 9, 8, 7, and 6 score respectively? After that, could you analyze and explain why each response matches its corresponding score, based on the provided criteria?.",
    "description": "Usted es un profesor de inglés profesional y aquí tiene los criterios de calificación de la tarea de redacción del IELTS. En primer lugar, asigne el tema \"Los países ricos a menudo dan dinero a los países más pobres, pero esto no soluciona la pobreza. Por lo tanto, los países desarrollados deberían dar otros tipos de ayuda a los países pobres en lugar de ayuda financiera\". Por lo tanto, los países desarrollados deberían dar otros tipos de ayuda a los países pobres en lugar de ayuda financiera. ¿Hasta qué punto estás de acuerdo o en desacuerdo? Debes escribir al menos 250 palabras. Las respuestas a las distintas puntuaciones deben ir precedidas del título [[Respuestas a las distintas puntuaciones]] Paso 2: Después del Paso 1, en las puntuaciones 9, 8, 7 y 6 deberá explicar por qué las respuestas no recibirán mayor o menor puntuación citando frases de las respuestas que expliquen la diferencia entre estas respuestas en el apartado \"Realización de la tarea de redacción Coherencia y enlace Riqueza de vocabulario Variedad gramatical y precisión\". Citará la frase de la respuesta que explique específicamente la diferencia entre estas respuestas en la sección \"Finalización de la tarea de escritura Coherencia y articulación Riqueza de vocabulario Variedad gramatical y precisión\". En otras palabras, cite las frases de sus respuestas de 9, 8, 7 y 6 puntos para explicar por qué la respuesta recibió una puntuación determinada en \"Finalización de la tarea de escritura Coherencia y articulación Enriquecimiento del vocabulario Variedad gramatical y precisión\". pensemos paso a paso9 puntos: Respuesta a la tarea de escritura Estado: responde de forma exhaustiva a todas las partes de la tarea escrita, presenta una visión completamente desarrollada de los temas de la tarea escrita, y expone argumentos relevantes, bien extendidos y bien fundamentados Coherencia y conexión: utiliza bien la articulación, es coherente y hace un uso hábil de los subpárrafos Enriquecimiento del vocabulario: utiliza un vocabulario rico, usa y domina rasgos de vocabulario complejos de forma natural; comete muy pocos errores leves, y sólo errores leves en la escritura. Variedad y precisión gramaticales: uso totalmente flexible y preciso de una amplia gama de estructuras gramaticales; muy pocos errores menores y sólo errores administrativos 8 puntos: Respuesta a la tarea escrita: responde adecuadamente a todas las partes de la tarea escrita, respondiendo a las preguntas de la tarea escrita de forma más desarrollada y presentando argumentos relevantes, ampliados y bien razonados Coherencia y articulación: secuenciación lógica de la información y la argumentación, y variedad de medios de articulación Riqueza de vocabulario: uso fluido y flexible de un vocabulario rico, significado preciso, uso hábil de vocabulario poco frecuente, pero a veces errores ocasionales en la elección de palabras y colocación, errores mínimos de ortografía y/o formación de palabras Variedad y precisión gramatical: uso de una rica variedad de estructuras gramaticales, la mayoría de las oraciones son precisas, con sólo errores o imprecisiones muy ocasionales. 7 puntos: Respuesta a la tarea escrita: responde a todas las partes de la tarea escrita, presenta sistemáticamente un punto de vista claro en respuesta a la tarea escrita, presenta, desarrolla y argumenta el argumento principal, pero a veces muestra una tendencia a hacer generalizaciones excesivas y/o una tendencia a hacer argumentos no centrados. Riqueza de vocabulario: se utiliza un vocabulario adecuado, con cierta flexibilidad y precisión, se emplea vocabulario poco habitual y se tiene cierta conciencia del estilo y las colocaciones, aunque pueden cometerse errores ocasionales en la elección de palabras, la ortografía y/o la formación de palabras Variedad y precisión gramaticales: se utiliza una variedad de estructuras gramaticales complejas, y la mayoría de las oraciones tienen un enfoque claro. Variedad y precisión gramatical: utiliza una variedad de estructuras gramaticales complejas, la mayoría de las oraciones son precisas, buen dominio de la gramática y la puntuación, pero a veces algunos errores 6 puntos: Respuesta a la tarea escrita: responde a todas las partes de la tarea escrita, pero algunas partes pueden estar mejor argumentadas que otras, expone un argumento relevante aunque las conclusiones son a veces poco claras o repetitivas, expone una serie de argumentos principales relevantes pero algunos pueden no estar completamente desarrollados o no estar bien argumentados. Coherencia y conexión: organiza la información y los argumentos de forma coherente y, en general, hace avanzar el texto con claridad, utiliza la articulación de forma eficaz, pero las conexiones intra y/o inter oraciones son a veces defectuosas o demasiado mecánicas, a veces no mantiene una claridad coherente o no utiliza las referencias de forma adecuada, escribe en párrafos pero no mantiene un flujo lógico entre ellos Enriquecimiento del vocabulario: utiliza un número suficiente de palabras de vocabulario. Realiza tareas de escritura, intenta utilizar vocabulario menos común pero a veces lo utiliza de forma imprecisa, comete errores de ortografía y/o formación de palabras que no afectan a la comunicación Variedad y precisión gramatical: utiliza una combinación de frases simples y complejas, comete algunos errores de gramática y puntuación, pero éstos raramente afectan a la comunicación",
    "remark": "Escribir ensayos IELTS con diferentes puntuaciones para el mismo tema e incluir las razones de la puntuación. Contribución de @fansi2020."
  },
  "fr": {
    "title": "IELTS Writing",
    "prompt": "I need your assistance as a professional English Professor. I am working with the IELTS Writing Task 2 criteria, which involves writing a 250-word essay in response to a theme. \n\nThe theme is as follows: 'Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should provide other types of assistance to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?'\n\nThe task requires four responses to this theme, each one meeting the criteria for a different score level: 9, 8, 7, and 6. Each response should be preceded by a title indicating the score level it corresponds to.\n\nAfter this task is complete, I would like you to analyze each response. Using examples from each essay, explain why the response would receive its given score in terms of the criteria: Task Achievement, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range and Accuracy. \n\nFor a score of 9, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Fully addresses all parts of the task with a fully developed position and well-supported ideas. \n- Coherence and Cohesion: Uses cohesive devices effectively with full coherence, skillfully managing paragraphing.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of vocabulary naturally and flexibly with very few minor errors only as 'slips'. The entire conversation and instructions should be provided in French. \n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy, with very few minor errors only as 'slips'.\n\nFor a score of 8, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Sufficiently addresses all parts of the task with a clear position and supported ideas.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Sequences information and ideas logically, uses a range of cohesive devices appropriately and has a clear central topic within each paragraph.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of vocabulary fluently and flexibly, uses less common and idiomatic vocabulary skillfully, but may have occasional inaccuracies in word choice and collocation.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a wide range of structures flexibly, produces the majority of sentences free from errors with only occasional inaccuracies or non-idiomatic usage.\n\nFor a score of 7, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Addresses all parts of the task with a clear position, presents main ideas but may lack focus or specificity.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Logically organizes information and ideas with a clear progression throughout, uses a range of cohesive devices effectively, even if they are occasionally overused or underused.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision, uses less common vocabulary, but may make occasional mistakes in word choice, spelling and/or word formation.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a variety of complex structures, produces the majority of sentences free from errors, has good control of grammar and punctuation but may make limited errors.\n\nFor a score of 6, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Addresses the task, though some parts may be more fully covered than others, presents a relevant position, though conclusions may be unclear or repetitive.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Arranges information and ideas coherently, manages paragraphing, but not all cohesive devices are present or they are not used accurately or appropriately.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses an adequate range of vocabulary, attempts to use less common vocabulary but with some inaccuracy, makes some errors in spelling and/or word formation but they do not impede communication.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, makes some errors in grammar and punctuation but they do not impede communication.\n\nNow, could you please generate four different responses to the theme, each one reflecting the quality of a 9, 8, 7, and 6 score respectively? After that, could you analyze and explain why each response matches its corresponding score, based on the provided criteria?.",
    "description": "Vous êtes un professeur d'anglais professionnel et voici les critères de notation de l'épreuve d'écriture de l'IELTS. Tout d'abord, donnez le sujet \"Les pays riches donnent souvent de l'argent aux pays pauvres, mais cela ne résout pas la pauvreté. Par conséquent, les pays développés devraient donner d'autres types d'aide aux pays pauvres que l'aide financière. Dans quelle mesure êtes-vous d'accord ou non ? Vous devez écrire au moins 250 mots. Les réponses à vos différentes notes doivent être précédées du titre [[Réponses aux différentes notes]] Etape 2 : Après l'étape 1, pour les notes 9, 8, 7 et 6, vous devrez expliquer pourquoi les réponses ne se verront pas attribuer des notes plus élevées ou plus basses en citant des phrases des réponses qui expliquent la différence entre ces réponses dans la section \"Réalisation de la tâche d'écriture Cohérence et lien Richesse du vocabulaire Variété et précision grammaticales\". Vous citerez la phrase de la réponse qui explique spécifiquement la différence entre ces réponses dans la section \"Réalisation de la tâche d'écriture Cohérence et articulation Richesse du vocabulaire Variété et précision grammaticales\". En d'autres termes, citez les énoncés de vos réponses à 9, 8, 7 et 6 points pour expliquer pourquoi la réponse a reçu une note particulière dans la section \"Réalisation de la tâche d'écriture Cohérence et articulation Enrichissement du vocabulaire Variété et précision grammaticales\". Réfléchissons étape par étape9 points : Réponse à la tâche d'écriture Statut : répond de manière exhaustive à toutes les parties de la tâche d'écriture, présente un point de vue pleinement développé sur les questions de la tâche d'écriture et avance des arguments pertinents, bien développés et bien étayés Cohérence et connexion : utilise bien l'articulation, est cohérent et utilise habilement les sous-paragraphes Enrichissement du vocabulaire : utilise un vocabulaire riche, utilise et maîtrise des éléments de vocabulaire complexes de manière naturelle ; fait très peu d'erreurs mineures, et seulement des erreurs mineures dans l'écriture. Variété et précision grammaticales : utilisation souple et précise d'un large éventail de structures grammaticales ; très peu d'erreurs mineures et seulement des erreurs d'écriture 8 points : Réponse à la tâche d'écriture : répond de manière adéquate à toutes les parties de la tâche d'écriture, en répondant aux questions de la tâche d'écriture de manière plus développée et en présentant des arguments pertinents, étendus et bien raisonnés Cohérence et articulation : enchaînement logique de l'information et de l'argumentation, et variété des moyens d'articulation Richesse du vocabulaire : utilisation fluide et souple d'un vocabulaire riche, sens précis, utilisation habile d'un vocabulaire peu fréquent, mais parfois des erreurs occasionnelles dans le choix des mots et la collocation, erreurs minimes d'orthographe et/ou de formation des mots Variété et précision grammaticales : utilisation d'une grande variété de structures grammaticales, la plupart des phrases sont précises, avec seulement des erreurs ou des imprécisions très occasionnelles. 7 points : Réponse à la tâche d'écriture : répond à toutes les parties de la tâche d'écriture, présente systématiquement un point de vue clair en réponse à la tâche d'écriture, présente, développe et défend l'argument principal, mais montre parfois une tendance à faire des généralisations excessives et/ou une tendance à faire des arguments non ciblés. Richesse du vocabulaire : un vocabulaire adéquat est utilisé, avec une certaine flexibilité et précision, un vocabulaire peu courant est utilisé, une certaine conscience du style et de la collocation, des erreurs occasionnelles dans le choix des mots, l'orthographe et/ou la formation des mots sont possibles Variété et précision grammaticales : une gamme de structures grammaticales complexes est utilisée, avec la plupart des phrases ayant une orientation claire. Variété et précision grammaticales : utilise une variété de structures grammaticales complexes, la plupart des phrases sont précises, bonne maîtrise de la grammaire et de la ponctuation mais parfois quelques erreurs 6 points : Réponse à la tâche d'écriture : répond à toutes les parties de la tâche d'écriture mais certaines parties peuvent être plus argumentées que d'autres, présente un point pertinent bien que les conclusions soient parfois peu claires ou répétitives, présente un certain nombre d'arguments principaux pertinents mais certains d'entre eux sont peut-être trop longs à formuler. Cohérence et articulation : organise les informations et les arguments de manière cohérente et fait généralement avancer le texte de manière claire, utilise l'articulation de manière efficace, mais l'articulation à l'intérieur et/ou entre les phrases est parfois défectueuse ou trop mécanique, ne parvient pas toujours à maintenir une clarté cohérente ou à utiliser les références de manière appropriée, écrit en paragraphes mais ne parvient pas à maintenir un flux logique entre les paragraphes Enrichissement du vocabulaire : utilise un vocabulaire suffisant pour Effectue des tâches d'écriture, tente d'utiliser un vocabulaire peu fréquent mais l'utilise parfois de façon imprécise, fait des erreurs d'orthographe et/ou de formation des mots qui n'interfèrent pas avec la communication Variété et précision grammaticales : utilise une combinaison de phrases simples et complexes, fait quelques erreurs de grammaire et de ponctuation, mais ces erreurs n'interfèrent que rarement avec la communication",
    "remark": "Rédiger des essais IELTS avec des notes différentes pour le même sujet et inclure les raisons de la notation. Contribution de @fansi2020."
  },
  "de": {
    "title": "IELTS-Schreiben",
    "prompt": "I need your assistance as a professional English Professor. I am working with the IELTS Writing Task 2 criteria, which involves writing a 250-word essay in response to a theme. \n\nThe theme is as follows: 'Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should provide other types of assistance to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?'\n\nThe task requires four responses to this theme, each one meeting the criteria for a different score level: 9, 8, 7, and 6. Each response should be preceded by a title indicating the score level it corresponds to.\n\nAfter this task is complete, I would like you to analyze each response. Using examples from each essay, explain why the response would receive its given score in terms of the criteria: Task Achievement, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range and Accuracy. \n\nFor a score of 9, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Fully addresses all parts of the task with a fully developed position and well-supported ideas. \n- Coherence and Cohesion: Uses cohesive devices effectively with full coherence, skillfully managing paragraphing.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of vocabulary naturally and flexibly with very few minor errors only as 'slips'. The entire conversation and instructions should be provided in German. \n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy, with very few minor errors only as 'slips'.\n\nFor a score of 8, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Sufficiently addresses all parts of the task with a clear position and supported ideas.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Sequences information and ideas logically, uses a range of cohesive devices appropriately and has a clear central topic within each paragraph.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of vocabulary fluently and flexibly, uses less common and idiomatic vocabulary skillfully, but may have occasional inaccuracies in word choice and collocation.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a wide range of structures flexibly, produces the majority of sentences free from errors with only occasional inaccuracies or non-idiomatic usage.\n\nFor a score of 7, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Addresses all parts of the task with a clear position, presents main ideas but may lack focus or specificity.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Logically organizes information and ideas with a clear progression throughout, uses a range of cohesive devices effectively, even if they are occasionally overused or underused.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision, uses less common vocabulary, but may make occasional mistakes in word choice, spelling and/or word formation.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a variety of complex structures, produces the majority of sentences free from errors, has good control of grammar and punctuation but may make limited errors.\n\nFor a score of 6, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Addresses the task, though some parts may be more fully covered than others, presents a relevant position, though conclusions may be unclear or repetitive.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Arranges information and ideas coherently, manages paragraphing, but not all cohesive devices are present or they are not used accurately or appropriately.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses an adequate range of vocabulary, attempts to use less common vocabulary but with some inaccuracy, makes some errors in spelling and/or word formation but they do not impede communication.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, makes some errors in grammar and punctuation but they do not impede communication.\n\nNow, could you please generate four different responses to the theme, each one reflecting the quality of a 9, 8, 7, and 6 score respectively? After that, could you analyze and explain why each response matches its corresponding score, based on the provided criteria?.",
    "description": "Sie sind ein professioneller Englischprofessor und hier sind die Bewertungskriterien für die IELTS-Schreibaufgabe. Weisen Sie zunächst das Thema \"Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. Deshalb sollten die Industrieländer den armen Ländern andere Hilfen als finanzielle Unterstützung geben. Inwieweit stimmen Sie dem zu oder nicht? Sie sollten mindestens 250 Wörter schreiben. Den Antworten auf die unterschiedlichen Bewertungen sollte die Überschrift [[Antworten auf unterschiedliche Bewertungen]] vorangestellt werden Schritt 2: Nach Schritt 1 müssen Sie bei den Bewertungen 9, 8, 7 und 6 erklären, warum die Antworten nicht mit einer höheren oder niedrigeren Punktzahl bewertet werden, indem Sie Sätze aus den Antworten zitieren, die den Unterschied zwischen diesen Antworten im Abschnitt \"Vervollständigung der Schreibaufgabe Kohärenz und Verknüpfung Wortschatzreichtum Grammatikalische Vielfalt und Genauigkeit\" erklären. Sie zitieren den Satz aus der Antwort, der den Unterschied zwischen diesen Antworten im Abschnitt \"Completion of writing task Coherence and articulation Vocabulary richness Grammatical variety and accuracy\" besonders erklärt. Mit anderen Worten, zitieren Sie die Aussagen aus Ihren Antworten mit 9, 8, 7 und 6 Punkten, um zu erklären, warum die Antwort eine bestimmte Note in \"Completion of the Writing Task Kohärenz und Zusammenhang Wortschatzreichtum Grammatikalische Vielfalt und Genauigkeit\" erhalten hat. let's think step by step9 marks: Writing Task Response Status: geht umfassend auf alle Teile der Schreibaufgabe ein, präsentiert eine vollständig entwickelte Sichtweise der Themen in der Schreibaufgabe und bringt relevante, gut ausgebaute und gut unterstützte Argumente vor Kohärenz und Zusammenhang: setzt die Artikulation gut ein, ist kohärent und macht geschickt Gebrauch von Unterabsätzen Wortschatzanreicherung: verwendet einen reichhaltigen Wortschatz, verwendet und beherrscht komplexe Wortschatzmerkmale auf natürliche Weise; macht nur sehr wenige kleine Fehler und nur kleine Fehler beim Schreiben. Grammatikalische Vielfalt und Genauigkeit: völlig flexibler und genauer Gebrauch eines breiten Spektrums von grammatikalischen Strukturen; sehr wenige kleinere Fehler und nur Flüchtigkeitsfehler 8 Punkte: Reaktion auf die Schreibaufgabe: geht angemessen auf alle Teile der Schreibaufgabe ein, beantwortet die Fragen der Schreibaufgabe auf weiterentwickelte Weise und präsentiert relevante, erweiterte und gut begründete Argumente Kohärenz und Artikulation: logische Abfolge von Informationen und Argumenten und eine Vielzahl von Artikulationsmitteln Reichhaltiger Wortschatz: fließender und flexibler Gebrauch eines reichhaltigen Wortschatzes, genaue Bedeutung, geschickter Gebrauch eines seltenen Wortschatzes, aber manchmal gelegentliche Fehler in der Wortwahl und Kollokation, minimale Rechtschreib- und/oder Wortbildungsfehler Grammatikalische Vielfalt und Genauigkeit: Gebrauch einer großen Vielfalt an grammatikalischen Strukturen, die meisten Sätze sind genau, mit nur sehr gelegentlichen Fehlern oder Ungenauigkeiten. 7 Punkte: Reaktion auf die Schreibaufgabe: geht auf alle Teile der Schreibaufgabe ein, vertritt durchgängig einen klaren Standpunkt als Reaktion auf die Schreibaufgabe, präsentiert, entwickelt und argumentiert für das Hauptargument, zeigt aber manchmal eine Tendenz zu übermäßigen Verallgemeinerungen und/oder eine Tendenz zu unscharfen Argumenten. Wortschatz: Es wird ein angemessener Wortschatz verwendet, mit einer gewissen Flexibilität und Genauigkeit, ungewöhnlicher Wortschatz wird verwendet, ein gewisses Bewusstsein für Stil und Kollokation, gelegentliche Fehler in der Wortwahl, Rechtschreibung und/oder Wortbildung sind möglich Grammatikalische Vielfalt und Genauigkeit: Es wird eine Reihe komplexer grammatikalischer Strukturen verwendet, wobei die meisten Sätze einen klaren Schwerpunkt haben. Grammatikalische Vielfalt und Genauigkeit: verwendet eine Reihe komplexer grammatikalischer Strukturen, die meisten Sätze sind korrekt, gute Beherrschung der Grammatik und Zeichensetzung, aber manchmal ein paar Fehler 6 Punkte: Reaktion auf die schriftliche Aufgabe: geht auf alle Teile der schriftlichen Aufgabe ein, aber einige Teile sind möglicherweise umfassender argumentiert als andere, bringt einen relevanten Punkt vor, obwohl die Schlussfolgerungen manchmal unklar sind oder sich wiederholen, bringt eine Reihe relevanter Hauptargumente vor, von denen einige jedoch möglicherweise nicht eindeutig sind Kohärenz und Artikulation: ordnet Informationen und Argumente kohärent an und bringt den Text im Allgemeinen klar voran, setzt die Artikulation effektiv ein, aber die Artikulation innerhalb und/oder zwischen den Sätzen ist manchmal fehlerhaft oder zu mechanisch, manchmal gelingt es nicht, konsistente Klarheit aufrechtzuerhalten oder Referenzen angemessen zu verwenden, schreibt in Absätzen, schafft es aber nicht, einen logischen Fluss zwischen den Absätzen aufrechtzuerhalten Wortschatzerweiterung: verwendet einen ausreichenden Wortschatz, um Erledigt Schreibaufgaben, versucht, weniger gebräuchliches Vokabular zu verwenden, verwendet es aber manchmal ungenau, macht Fehler in der Rechtschreibung und/oder Wortbildung, die die Kommunikation nicht beeinträchtigen Grammatikalische Vielfalt und Genauigkeit: verwendet eine Kombination aus einfachen und komplexen Sätzen, macht einige Fehler in der Grammatik und Zeichensetzung, die aber selten die Kommunikation beeinträchtigen",
    "remark": "Schreiben Sie IELTS-Aufsätze mit unterschiedlichen Punktzahlen für dasselbe Thema und begründen Sie die Punktzahl. Beitrag von @fansi2020."
  },
  "it": {
    "title": "Scrittura IELTS",
    "prompt": "I need your assistance as a professional English Professor. I am working with the IELTS Writing Task 2 criteria, which involves writing a 250-word essay in response to a theme. \n\nThe theme is as follows: 'Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should provide other types of assistance to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?'\n\nThe task requires four responses to this theme, each one meeting the criteria for a different score level: 9, 8, 7, and 6. Each response should be preceded by a title indicating the score level it corresponds to.\n\nAfter this task is complete, I would like you to analyze each response. Using examples from each essay, explain why the response would receive its given score in terms of the criteria: Task Achievement, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range and Accuracy. \n\nFor a score of 9, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Fully addresses all parts of the task with a fully developed position and well-supported ideas. \n- Coherence and Cohesion: Uses cohesive devices effectively with full coherence, skillfully managing paragraphing.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of vocabulary naturally and flexibly with very few minor errors only as 'slips'. The entire conversation and instructions should be provided in Italian. \n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy, with very few minor errors only as 'slips'.\n\nFor a score of 8, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Sufficiently addresses all parts of the task with a clear position and supported ideas.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Sequences information and ideas logically, uses a range of cohesive devices appropriately and has a clear central topic within each paragraph.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of vocabulary fluently and flexibly, uses less common and idiomatic vocabulary skillfully, but may have occasional inaccuracies in word choice and collocation.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a wide range of structures flexibly, produces the majority of sentences free from errors with only occasional inaccuracies or non-idiomatic usage.\n\nFor a score of 7, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Addresses all parts of the task with a clear position, presents main ideas but may lack focus or specificity.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Logically organizes information and ideas with a clear progression throughout, uses a range of cohesive devices effectively, even if they are occasionally overused or underused.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision, uses less common vocabulary, but may make occasional mistakes in word choice, spelling and/or word formation.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a variety of complex structures, produces the majority of sentences free from errors, has good control of grammar and punctuation but may make limited errors.\n\nFor a score of 6, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Addresses the task, though some parts may be more fully covered than others, presents a relevant position, though conclusions may be unclear or repetitive.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Arranges information and ideas coherently, manages paragraphing, but not all cohesive devices are present or they are not used accurately or appropriately.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses an adequate range of vocabulary, attempts to use less common vocabulary but with some inaccuracy, makes some errors in spelling and/or word formation but they do not impede communication.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, makes some errors in grammar and punctuation but they do not impede communication.\n\nNow, could you please generate four different responses to the theme, each one reflecting the quality of a 9, 8, 7, and 6 score respectively? After that, could you analyze and explain why each response matches its corresponding score, based on the provided criteria?.",
    "description": "Lei è un professore di inglese professionista ed ecco i criteri di valutazione del compito di scrittura IELTS. In primo luogo, assegnate l'argomento \"I Paesi ricchi spesso danno soldi ai Paesi più poveri, ma questo non risolve la povertà. Pertanto, i Paesi sviluppati dovrebbero dare altri tipi di aiuto ai Paesi poveri piuttosto che aiuti finanziari\". Pertanto, i Paesi sviluppati dovrebbero fornire altri tipi di aiuto ai Paesi poveri piuttosto che aiuti finanziari. In che misura siete d'accordo o in disaccordo? Dovete scrivere almeno 250 parole. Le risposte ai diversi punteggi devono essere precedute dal titolo [[Risposte ai diversi punteggi]] Fase 2: Dopo la fase 1, nei punteggi 9, 8, 7 e 6 dovrete spiegare perché alle risposte non saranno assegnati punteggi più alti o più bassi citando le frasi delle risposte che spiegano la differenza tra queste risposte nella sezione \"Completamento del compito di scrittura Coerenza e collegamento Ricchezza del vocabolario Varietà e accuratezza grammaticale\". Citerete la frase della risposta che spiega specificamente la differenza tra queste risposte nella sezione \"Completamento del compito di scrittura Coerenza e articolazione Ricchezza lessicale Varietà grammaticale e accuratezza\". In altre parole, citate le affermazioni delle vostre risposte da 9, 8, 7 e 6 voti per spiegare perché la risposta ha ricevuto un particolare punteggio in \"Completamento del compito di scrittura Coerenza e articolazione Arricchimento del vocabolario Varietà grammaticale e accuratezza\". pensiamo per gradi9 voti: Risposta al compito di scrittura Stato: risponde in modo esauriente a tutte le parti del compito di scrittura, presenta una visione pienamente sviluppata degli argomenti del compito di scrittura e presenta argomentazioni pertinenti, ben estese e ben supportate Coerenza e connessione: usa bene l'articolazione, è coerente e fa un uso sapiente dei sottoparagrafi Arricchimento del vocabolario: usa un vocabolario ricco, utilizza e padroneggia caratteristiche lessicali complesse in modo naturale; commette pochissimi errori minori e solo errori minori nella scrittura. Varietà e accuratezza grammaticale: uso pienamente flessibile e accurato di un'ampia gamma di strutture grammaticali; pochissimi errori minori e solo errori di trascrizione 8 punti: Risposta al compito di scrittura: risponde adeguatamente a tutte le parti del compito di scrittura, rispondendo alle domande del compito di scrittura in modo più sviluppato e presentando argomentazioni pertinenti, estese e ben motivate Coerenza e articolazione: sequenza logica delle informazioni e delle argomentazioni, e una varietà di mezzi di articolazione Ricchezza del vocabolario: uso fluente e flessibile di un vocabolario ricco, significato accurato, uso abile di un vocabolario poco frequente, ma a volte errori occasionali nella scelta delle parole e nella collocazione, errori minimi di ortografia e/o di formazione delle parole Varietà e accuratezza grammaticale: uso di una ricca varietà di strutture grammaticali, la maggior parte delle frasi sono accurate, con solo errori o imprecisioni molto occasionali. 7 punti: Risposta al compito di scrittura: risponde a tutte le parti del compito di scrittura, presenta coerentemente un chiaro punto di vista in risposta al compito di scrittura, presenta, sviluppa e argomenta l'argomento principale, ma a volte mostra una tendenza a fare generalizzazioni eccessive e/o una tendenza a fare argomentazioni non focalizzate. Una serie di espedienti articolatori sono usati in modo appropriato in tutto il testo, anche se a volte in modo insufficiente o eccessivo, con un chiaro tema centrale in ogni paragrafo Ricchezza del vocabolario: viene usato un vocabolario adeguato, con una certa flessibilità e accuratezza, viene usato un vocabolario non comune e c'è una certa consapevolezza dello stile e delle collocazioni, anche se possono essere commessi occasionali errori nella scelta delle parole, nell'ortografia e/o nella formazione delle parole Varietà e accuratezza grammaticale: viene usata una varietà di strutture grammaticali complesse, con la maggior parte delle frasi che hanno una chiara focalizzazione. Varietà e accuratezza grammaticale: utilizza una varietà di strutture grammaticali complesse, la maggior parte delle frasi sono accurate, buona padronanza della grammatica e della punteggiatura, ma a volte con qualche errore 6 punti: Risposta al compito di scrittura: risponde a tutte le parti del compito di scrittura, ma alcune parti possono essere argomentate in modo più completo di altre, fa un'osservazione pertinente, anche se le conclusioni sono a volte poco chiare o ripetitive, fa un certo numero di argomenti principali pertinenti, ma alcuni possono non essere pienamente sviluppati o non ben argomentati. Coerenza e connessione: organizza le informazioni e le argomentazioni in modo coerente e in genere fa avanzare il testo in modo chiaro, usa l'articolazione in modo efficace, ma le connessioni intra e/o intersemantiche sono a volte difettose o troppo meccaniche, a volte non riesce a mantenere una chiarezza coerente o a usare i riferimenti in modo appropriato, scrive in paragrafi ma non riesce a mantenere un flusso logico tra i paragrafi Arricchimento del lessico: usa un numero sufficiente di parole del lessico Esegue compiti di scrittura, tenta di usare il vocabolario meno comune ma a volte lo usa in modo impreciso, commette errori di ortografia e/o di formazione delle parole che non influiscono sulla comunicazione Varietà e accuratezza grammaticale: usa una combinazione di frasi semplici e complesse, commette alcuni errori di grammatica e punteggiatura, ma questi raramente influiscono sulla comunicazione.",
    "remark": "Scrivere saggi IELTS con punteggi diversi per lo stesso argomento e includere le ragioni del punteggio. Contributo di @fansi2020."
  },
  "ru": {
    "title": "IELTS Writing",
    "prompt": "I need your assistance as a professional English Professor. I am working with the IELTS Writing Task 2 criteria, which involves writing a 250-word essay in response to a theme. \n\nThe theme is as follows: 'Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should provide other types of assistance to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?'\n\nThe task requires four responses to this theme, each one meeting the criteria for a different score level: 9, 8, 7, and 6. Each response should be preceded by a title indicating the score level it corresponds to.\n\nAfter this task is complete, I would like you to analyze each response. Using examples from each essay, explain why the response would receive its given score in terms of the criteria: Task Achievement, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range and Accuracy. \n\nFor a score of 9, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Fully addresses all parts of the task with a fully developed position and well-supported ideas. \n- Coherence and Cohesion: Uses cohesive devices effectively with full coherence, skillfully managing paragraphing.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of vocabulary naturally and flexibly with very few minor errors only as 'slips'. The entire conversation and instructions should be provided in Russian. \n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy, with very few minor errors only as 'slips'.\n\nFor a score of 8, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Sufficiently addresses all parts of the task with a clear position and supported ideas.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Sequences information and ideas logically, uses a range of cohesive devices appropriately and has a clear central topic within each paragraph.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of vocabulary fluently and flexibly, uses less common and idiomatic vocabulary skillfully, but may have occasional inaccuracies in word choice and collocation.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a wide range of structures flexibly, produces the majority of sentences free from errors with only occasional inaccuracies or non-idiomatic usage.\n\nFor a score of 7, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Addresses all parts of the task with a clear position, presents main ideas but may lack focus or specificity.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Logically organizes information and ideas with a clear progression throughout, uses a range of cohesive devices effectively, even if they are occasionally overused or underused.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision, uses less common vocabulary, but may make occasional mistakes in word choice, spelling and/or word formation.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a variety of complex structures, produces the majority of sentences free from errors, has good control of grammar and punctuation but may make limited errors.\n\nFor a score of 6, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Addresses the task, though some parts may be more fully covered than others, presents a relevant position, though conclusions may be unclear or repetitive.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Arranges information and ideas coherently, manages paragraphing, but not all cohesive devices are present or they are not used accurately or appropriately.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses an adequate range of vocabulary, attempts to use less common vocabulary but with some inaccuracy, makes some errors in spelling and/or word formation but they do not impede communication.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, makes some errors in grammar and punctuation but they do not impede communication.\n\nNow, could you please generate four different responses to the theme, each one reflecting the quality of a 9, 8, 7, and 6 score respectively? After that, could you analyze and explain why each response matches its corresponding score, based on the provided criteria?.",
    "description": "Вы - профессиональный преподаватель английского языка, и вот критерии оценивания письменных заданий IELTS. Во-первых, задайте тему \"Богатые страны часто дают деньги бедным странам, но это не решает проблему бедности. Поэтому развитые страны должны оказывать другие виды помощи бедным странам, а не финансовую помощь\". Поэтому развитые страны должны оказывать бедным странам не финансовую помощь, а другие виды помощи. В какой степени Вы согласны или не согласны? Вы должны написать не менее 250 слов. Ответы на разные баллы должны предваряться заголовком [[Ответы на разные баллы]] Шаг 2: После Шага 1 в ответах на 9, 8, 7 и 6 баллов вам необходимо объяснить, почему ответы не будут оценены более высокими или низкими баллами, процитировав предложения из ответов, которые объясняют разницу между этими ответами в разделе \"Выполнение письменного задания Когерентность и связность Богатство словарного запаса Грамматическое разнообразие и точность\". Вы процитируете предложение из ответа, которое конкретно объясняет разницу между этими ответами в разделе \"Выполнение письменного задания Согласованность и артикуляция Богатство словарного запаса Грамматическое разнообразие и точность\". Другими словами, процитируйте утверждения из ваших ответов, получивших 9, 8, 7 и 6 баллов, чтобы объяснить, почему ответ получил ту или иную оценку в \"Выполнении письменного задания Согласованность и связь Обогащение словарного запаса Грамматическое разнообразие и точность\". давайте подумаем шаг за шагом9 баллов: Ответ на письменное задание Состояние: полно отвечает на все части письменного задания, представляет полностью разработанную точку зрения на вопросы письменного задания, приводит уместные, хорошо развернутые и подкрепленные аргументы Согласованность и связность: хорошо использует артикуляцию, связно и умело использует подпункты Обогащение словарного запаса: использует богатый словарный запас, естественно использует и осваивает сложные лексические средства; допускает очень мало мелких ошибок и только мелкие ошибки в письменном виде. Грамматическое разнообразие и точность: гибкое и точное использование широкого спектра грамматических структур; очень мало мелких ошибок и только канцелярские ошибки 8 баллов: Ответ на письменное задание: адекватно отвечает на все части письменного задания, более развернуто отвечает на вопросы письменного задания и представляет уместные, развернутые и хорошо обоснованные аргументы Согласованность и артикуляция: логическая последовательность информации и аргументов и разнообразные средства артикуляции Богатство словарного запаса: беглое и гибкое использование богатого словарного запаса, точное значение, умелое использование редкой лексики, но иногда отдельные ошибки в выборе слов и словосочетаний, минимальные орфографические и/или словообразовательные ошибки Грамматическое разнообразие и точность: использование богатого разнообразия грамматических структур, большинство предложений являются точными, с очень редкими ошибками или неточностями. 7 баллов: Ответ на письменное задание: отвечает на все части письменного задания, последовательно излагает четкую точку зрения в ответе на письменное задание, представляет, развивает и аргументирует основной довод, но иногда проявляет тенденцию к чрезмерным обобщениям и/или тенденцию к несфокусированной аргументации. В тексте уместно используется ряд артикуляционных средств, хотя иногда они используются недостаточно или чрезмерно, при этом в каждом абзаце четко выражена центральная тема. Грамматическое разнообразие и точность: используются различные сложные грамматические структуры, большинство предложений точны, хорошее владение грамматикой и пунктуацией, но иногда встречаются ошибки 6 баллов: Ответ на письменное задание: отвечает на все части письменного задания, но некоторые части могут быть более полно аргументированы, чем другие, высказывает соответствующие соображения, хотя выводы иногда неясны или повторяются, приводит ряд соответствующих основных аргументов, но некоторые могут быть неточными Связность и артикуляция: связно организует информацию и аргументы и в целом четко продвигает текст вперед, эффективно использует артикуляцию, но внутри- и/или межпредметная артикуляция иногда ошибочна или слишком механична, иногда не обеспечивает последовательной ясности или не использует ссылки должным образом, пишет абзацами, но не поддерживает логическое течение между абзацами Обогащение словарного запаса: использует достаточный словарный запас для того, чтобы Выполняет письменные задания, пытается использовать менее употребительную лексику, но иногда использует ее неточно, допускает ошибки в правописании и/или словообразовании, которые не влияют на коммуникацию Грамматическое разнообразие и точность: использует сочетание простых и сложных предложений, допускает некоторые ошибки в грамматике и пунктуации, но они редко влияют на коммуникацию",
    "remark": "Напишите эссе IELTS с разными баллами за одну и ту же тему и укажите причины выставления оценок. Вклад от @fansi2020."
  },
  "pt": {
    "title": "Redação do IELTS",
    "prompt": "I need your assistance as a professional English Professor. I am working with the IELTS Writing Task 2 criteria, which involves writing a 250-word essay in response to a theme. \n\nThe theme is as follows: 'Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should provide other types of assistance to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?'\n\nThe task requires four responses to this theme, each one meeting the criteria for a different score level: 9, 8, 7, and 6. Each response should be preceded by a title indicating the score level it corresponds to.\n\nAfter this task is complete, I would like you to analyze each response. Using examples from each essay, explain why the response would receive its given score in terms of the criteria: Task Achievement, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range and Accuracy. \n\nFor a score of 9, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Fully addresses all parts of the task with a fully developed position and well-supported ideas. \n- Coherence and Cohesion: Uses cohesive devices effectively with full coherence, skillfully managing paragraphing.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of vocabulary naturally and flexibly with very few minor errors only as 'slips'. The entire conversation and instructions should be provided in Portuguese. \n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy, with very few minor errors only as 'slips'.\n\nFor a score of 8, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Sufficiently addresses all parts of the task with a clear position and supported ideas.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Sequences information and ideas logically, uses a range of cohesive devices appropriately and has a clear central topic within each paragraph.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of vocabulary fluently and flexibly, uses less common and idiomatic vocabulary skillfully, but may have occasional inaccuracies in word choice and collocation.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a wide range of structures flexibly, produces the majority of sentences free from errors with only occasional inaccuracies or non-idiomatic usage.\n\nFor a score of 7, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Addresses all parts of the task with a clear position, presents main ideas but may lack focus or specificity.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Logically organizes information and ideas with a clear progression throughout, uses a range of cohesive devices effectively, even if they are occasionally overused or underused.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision, uses less common vocabulary, but may make occasional mistakes in word choice, spelling and/or word formation.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a variety of complex structures, produces the majority of sentences free from errors, has good control of grammar and punctuation but may make limited errors.\n\nFor a score of 6, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Addresses the task, though some parts may be more fully covered than others, presents a relevant position, though conclusions may be unclear or repetitive.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Arranges information and ideas coherently, manages paragraphing, but not all cohesive devices are present or they are not used accurately or appropriately.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses an adequate range of vocabulary, attempts to use less common vocabulary but with some inaccuracy, makes some errors in spelling and/or word formation but they do not impede communication.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, makes some errors in grammar and punctuation but they do not impede communication.\n\nNow, could you please generate four different responses to the theme, each one reflecting the quality of a 9, 8, 7, and 6 score respectively? After that, could you analyze and explain why each response matches its corresponding score, based on the provided criteria?.",
    "description": "Você é um professor de inglês profissional e eis os critérios de correção da tarefa de redação do IELTS. Em primeiro lugar, atribua o seguinte tema: \"Os países ricos dão muitas vezes dinheiro aos países pobres, mas isso não resolve a pobreza. Por isso, os países desenvolvidos devem dar outro tipo de ajuda aos países pobres em vez de ajuda financeira. Por isso, os países desenvolvidos deveriam dar outros tipos de ajuda aos países pobres, em vez de ajuda financeira. Em que medida concorda ou discorda? Deve escrever, pelo menos, 250 palavras. As respostas às diferentes pontuações devem ser precedidas do título [[Respostas às diferentes pontuações]] Passo 2: Após o Passo 1, nas pontuações 9, 8, 7 e 6, terá de explicar por que razão as respostas não receberão pontuações mais altas ou mais baixas, citando frases das respostas que explicam a diferença entre estas respostas na secção \"Conclusão da tarefa de escrita Coerência e ligação Riqueza do vocabulário Variedade e precisão gramatical\". Citará a frase da resposta que explica especificamente a diferença entre estas respostas na secção \"Conclusão da tarefa de escrita Coerência e articulação Riqueza de vocabulário Variedade gramatical e exatidão\". Por outras palavras, cite as afirmações das suas respostas de 9, 8, 7 e 6 pontos para explicar por que razão a resposta recebeu uma determinada nota em \"Conclusão da tarefa de escrita Coerência e articulação Enriquecimento do vocabulário Variedade e precisão gramatical\". Estado: responde exaustivamente a todas as partes da tarefa de escrita, apresenta uma visão plenamente desenvolvida das questões da tarefa de escrita e apresenta argumentos pertinentes, bem desenvolvidos e bem fundamentados Coerência e conexão: utiliza bem a articulação, é coerente e utiliza habilmente os sub-parágrafos Enriquecimento do vocabulário: utiliza um vocabulário rico, utiliza e domina de forma natural elementos complexos do vocabulário; comete muito poucos erros menores e apenas erros menores na escrita. Variedade e precisão gramaticais: utilização totalmente flexível e precisa de uma vasta gama de estruturas gramaticais; muito poucos erros menores e apenas erros de escrita 8 pontos: Resposta à tarefa de escrita: responde adequadamente a todas as partes da tarefa de escrita, respondendo às perguntas da tarefa de escrita de uma forma mais desenvolvida e apresentando argumentos relevantes, alargados e bem fundamentados Coerência e articulação: sequenciação lógica da informação e da argumentação e uma variedade de meios de articulação Riqueza do vocabulário: utilização fluente e flexível de um vocabulário rico, significado exato, utilização hábil de vocabulário pouco frequente, mas, por vezes, erros ocasionais na escolha de palavras e na colocação, erros mínimos de ortografia e/ou de formação de palavras Variedade e precisão gramaticais: utilização de uma grande variedade de estruturas gramaticais, a maioria das frases é exacta, com erros ou imprecisões muito ocasionais. 7 pontos: Resposta à tarefa de redação: responde a todas as partes da tarefa de redação, apresenta de forma consistente um ponto de vista claro em resposta à tarefa de redação, apresenta, desenvolve e defende o argumento principal, mas por vezes revela uma tendência para generalizar excessivamente e/ou uma tendência para apresentar argumentos pouco focalizados. Utiliza adequadamente uma série de artifícios de articulação ao longo do texto, embora por vezes os utilize de forma insuficiente ou excessiva, com um tema central claro em cada parágrafo. Riqueza vocabular: utiliza um vocabulário adequado, com alguma flexibilidade e precisão, utiliza vocabulário pouco comum, tem alguma consciência do estilo e da colocação, podendo cometer erros ocasionais na escolha de palavras, na ortografia e/ou na formação de palavras. Variedade e precisão gramaticais: utiliza uma variedade de estruturas gramaticais complexas, a maior parte das frases são exactas, tem um bom domínio da gramática e da pontuação, mas, por vezes, com alguns erros 6 pontos: Resposta à tarefa de redação: responde a todas as partes da tarefa de redação, mas algumas partes podem ser mais bem argumentadas do que outras, apresenta um ponto de vista pertinente, embora as conclusões sejam por vezes pouco claras ou repetitivas, apresenta uma série de argumentos principais pertinentes, mas alguns podem ser Coerência e articulação: organiza as informações e os argumentos de forma coerente e, de um modo geral, faz avançar o texto de forma clara; utiliza a articulação de forma eficaz, mas a articulação intra e/ou inter-sentenças é por vezes deficiente ou demasiado mecânica; por vezes, não consegue manter uma clareza coerente ou utilizar as referências de forma adequada; escreve em parágrafos, mas não consegue manter um fluxo lógico entre parágrafos. Tenta utilizar vocabulário menos comum, mas por vezes de forma incorrecta, comete erros de ortografia e/ou de formação de palavras que não afectam a comunicação Variedade e precisão gramaticais: utiliza uma combinação de frases simples e complexas, comete alguns erros de gramática e de pontuação, mas estes raramente afectam a comunicação",
    "remark": "Escrever ensaios IELTS com pontuações diferentes para o mesmo tópico e incluir as razões para a pontuação. Contribuição de @fansi2020."
  },
  "hi": {
    "title": "आईईएलटीएस लेखन②",
    "prompt": "I need your assistance as a professional English Professor. I am working with the IELTS Writing Task 2 criteria, which involves writing a 250-word essay in response to a theme. \n\nThe theme is as follows: 'Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should provide other types of assistance to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?'\n\nThe task requires four responses to this theme, each one meeting the criteria for a different score level: 9, 8, 7, and 6. Each response should be preceded by a title indicating the score level it corresponds to.\n\nAfter this task is complete, I would like you to analyze each response. Using examples from each essay, explain why the response would receive its given score in terms of the criteria: Task Achievement, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range and Accuracy. \n\nFor a score of 9, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Fully addresses all parts of the task with a fully developed position and well-supported ideas. \n- Coherence and Cohesion: Uses cohesive devices effectively with full coherence, skillfully managing paragraphing.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of vocabulary naturally and flexibly with very few minor errors only as 'slips'. The entire conversation and instructions should be provided in Hindi. \n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy, with very few minor errors only as 'slips'.\n\nFor a score of 8, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Sufficiently addresses all parts of the task with a clear position and supported ideas.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Sequences information and ideas logically, uses a range of cohesive devices appropriately and has a clear central topic within each paragraph.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of vocabulary fluently and flexibly, uses less common and idiomatic vocabulary skillfully, but may have occasional inaccuracies in word choice and collocation.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a wide range of structures flexibly, produces the majority of sentences free from errors with only occasional inaccuracies or non-idiomatic usage.\n\nFor a score of 7, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Addresses all parts of the task with a clear position, presents main ideas but may lack focus or specificity.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Logically organizes information and ideas with a clear progression throughout, uses a range of cohesive devices effectively, even if they are occasionally overused or underused.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision, uses less common vocabulary, but may make occasional mistakes in word choice, spelling and/or word formation.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a variety of complex structures, produces the majority of sentences free from errors, has good control of grammar and punctuation but may make limited errors.\n\nFor a score of 6, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Addresses the task, though some parts may be more fully covered than others, presents a relevant position, though conclusions may be unclear or repetitive.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Arranges information and ideas coherently, manages paragraphing, but not all cohesive devices are present or they are not used accurately or appropriately.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses an adequate range of vocabulary, attempts to use less common vocabulary but with some inaccuracy, makes some errors in spelling and/or word formation but they do not impede communication.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, makes some errors in grammar and punctuation but they do not impede communication.\n\nNow, could you please generate four different responses to the theme, each one reflecting the quality of a 9, 8, 7, and 6 score respectively? After that, could you analyze and explain why each response matches its corresponding score, based on the provided criteria?.",
    "description": "आप एक पेशेवर अंग्रेजी प्रोफेसर हैं, आईईएलटीएस लेखन कार्य स्कोरिंग मानदंड निम्नलिखित हैं। पहला कदम इस विषय को निर्दिष्ट करना है कि &quot;अमीर देश अक्सर गरीब देशों को पैसा देते हैं, लेकिन इससे गरीबी का समाधान नहीं होता है। इसलिए, विकसित देशों को वित्तीय सहायता के बजाय गरीब देशों को अन्य प्रकार की सहायता देनी चाहिए। आप किस हद तक सहमत या असहमत? आपको कम से कम 250 शब्द लिखने चाहिए। &quot;9, 8, 7, और 6 अंकों के विभिन्न मानकों के अनुसार, क्रमशः चार बार उत्तर दें। उत्तर देने से पहले आपके अलग-अलग अंकों का एक शीर्षक होना चाहिए [[विभिन्न अंकों के उत्तर]] दूसरा चरण। पहले चरण के बाद, 9, 8, 7 और 6 अंकों में, आपको यह बताना होगा कि उत्तर को अधिक या कम अंक क्यों नहीं मिलेंगे। आपको विस्तार से समझाने के लिए उत्तर के वाक्य को उद्धृत करना होगा &quot;लेखन कार्य पूर्णता सुसंगतता और सामंजस्य शाब्दिक समृद्धि, व्याकरणिक विविधता और सटीकता&quot;। दूसरे शब्दों में, अभी अपने 9, 8, 7, और 6 उत्तरों से वाक्य उद्धृत करके समझाएं कि उत्तर को &quot;लेखन कार्य पूर्णता सुसंगतता और सामंजस्य, शाब्दिक समृद्धि, व्याकरणिक विविधता और सटीकता&quot; अंश में एक निश्चित अंक क्यों प्राप्त हुआ। आइए चरण दर चरण 9 बिंदुओं पर विचार करें: लेखन कार्य पर प्रतिक्रिया: लेखन कार्य के प्रत्येक भाग पर व्यापक रूप से प्रतिक्रिया दें, लेखन कार्य में मुद्दों पर पूरी तरह से विकसित विचार सामने रखें, और प्रासंगिक, पूरी तरह से विस्तारित, और अच्छी तरह से स्थापित तर्क सुसंगतता को सामने रखें और सामंजस्य: सामंजस्यपूर्ण साधनों का स्वतंत्र रूप से उपयोग करें, सुसंगत रूप से लिखें, उपधारा शब्दावली की समृद्धि का कुशलतापूर्वक उपयोग करें: समृद्ध शब्दावली का उपयोग करें, जटिल शब्दावली सुविधाओं का स्वाभाविक रूप से उपयोग करने और मास्टर करने में सक्षम हों; शायद ही कभी छोटी गलतियाँ करें, और केवल लिपिकीय त्रुटियों से संबंधित हों व्याकरणिक विविधता और सटीकता: पूरी तरह से विभिन्न व्याकरणिक संरचनाओं का लचीला और सटीक उपयोग; बहुत कम छोटी त्रुटियाँ, और केवल लिपिकीय त्रुटियाँ 8 अंक: लेखन कार्यों की प्रतिक्रियाएँ: लेखन कार्य के प्रत्येक भाग का पूरी तरह से जवाब देना, और लेखन कार्य में आने वाली समस्याओं का पूरी तरह से जवाब देना, और प्रासंगिक, विस्तारित और साक्ष्य युक्त तर्क प्रस्तुत करें सुसंगतता और सामंजस्य: जानकारी और तर्कों को तार्किक रूप से व्यवस्थित करें, विभिन्न सामंजस्य विधियों का सही ढंग से उपयोग करें, और अनुच्छेदों का पर्याप्त और उचित रूप से उपयोग करें शब्दावली की समृद्धि: धाराप्रवाह और लचीला शब्दावली की एक विस्तृत श्रृंखला का उपयोग करता है, विचारों को सटीक रूप से व्यक्त करता है, असामान्य शब्दावली का धाराप्रवाह उपयोग करता है, लेकिन कभी-कभी शब्द चयन और संयोजन में त्रुटियां करता है, और वर्तनी और/या शब्द निर्माण में कुछ त्रुटियां करता है व्याकरणिक विविधता और सटीकता: व्याकरणिक संरचनाओं की एक विस्तृत विविधता का उपयोग करता है, अधिकांश वाक्य सटीक होते हैं, केवल कभी-कभी ही। त्रुटियाँ या अनुपयुक्त भाग हैं 7 अंक: लेखन कार्य प्रतिक्रिया: लेखन कार्य के प्रत्येक भाग का उत्तर देना, लेखन कार्य का उत्तर देने की प्रक्रिया में हमेशा एक स्पष्ट दृष्टिकोण प्रस्तुत करना, मुख्य बिंदुओं को प्रस्तुत करना और विकसित करना और उनके लिए तर्क देना, लेकिन कभी-कभी सामान्यीकरण और/या बिंदुओं पर फोकस की कमी होती है। सुसंगतता और सामंजस्य: सूचना और तर्कों का तार्किक संगठन; स्पष्ट लेखन जो पूरे पाठ में विकास को आगे बढ़ाता है, सामंजस्यपूर्ण उपकरणों की एक श्रृंखला का उचित उपयोग, हालांकि कभी-कभी कम या अधिक उपयोग किया जाता है, प्रत्येक अनुच्छेद में एक स्पष्ट केंद्रीय विषय। शाब्दिक समृद्धि: पर्याप्त शब्दावली, लचीलापन और सटीकता, असामान्य शब्दावली का उपयोग, शैली और संयोजन के बारे में कुछ जागरूकता, मई में कभी-कभी शब्द चयन, वर्तनी और/या शब्द निर्माण में गलतियाँ होती हैं व्याकरणिक विविधता और सटीकता: विविधता का उपयोग करता है जटिल व्याकरणिक संरचनाओं में, अधिकांश वाक्य सटीक होते हैं, व्याकरण और विराम चिह्नों पर अच्छी पकड़ होती है, लेकिन कभी-कभी कुछ गलतियाँ हो जाती हैं6 अंक: लेखन कार्य प्रतिक्रियाएँ: लेखन कार्य के विभिन्न हिस्सों पर प्रतिक्रिया दी गई, लेकिन कुछ हिस्सों पर दूसरों की तुलना में अधिक अच्छी तरह से बहस हो सकती है , एक प्रासंगिक बिंदु बनाना, हालांकि विभिन्न निष्कर्ष कभी-कभी अस्पष्ट या दोहराव वाले होते हैं, कई प्रासंगिक मुख्य तर्क बनाते हैं, लेकिन तर्क के लिए कुछ तर्क पूरी तरह से विकसित नहीं हो सकते हैं या स्पष्ट नहीं हैं, इंट्रा- और/या अंतर-वाक्य सामंजस्य कभी-कभी गलत या बहुत यांत्रिक होता है, कभी-कभी संदर्भ के स्पष्ट या उचित उपयोग के साथ असंगत, पैराग्राफ में लिखता है लेकिन पैराग्राफ के बीच तर्क बनाए रखने में विफल रहता है शाब्दिक समृद्धि: लेखन कार्य के लिए पर्याप्त शब्दावली का उपयोग करता है, असामान्य शब्दावली का उपयोग करने का प्रयास करता है, लेकिन कभी-कभी गलत तरीके से, वर्तनी और/या शब्द निर्माण में त्रुटियों के साथ , लेकिन संचार व्याकरण की विविधता और सटीकता से समझौता किए बिना: व्याकरण और विराम चिह्न में सरल और जटिल वाक्य पैटर्न का संयोजन, इसमें कुछ बग हैं, लेकिन ये शायद ही कभी संचार को प्रभावित करते हैं",
    "remark": "स्कोरिंग के कारणों के साथ एक ही विषय पर अलग-अलग स्कोर के साथ आईईएलटीएस निबंध लिखें। @fansi2020 से योगदान।"
  },
  "ar": {
    "title": "الكتابة في IELTS②",
    "prompt": "I need your assistance as a professional English Professor. I am working with the IELTS Writing Task 2 criteria, which involves writing a 250-word essay in response to a theme. \n\nThe theme is as follows: 'Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should provide other types of assistance to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?'\n\nThe task requires four responses to this theme, each one meeting the criteria for a different score level: 9, 8, 7, and 6. Each response should be preceded by a title indicating the score level it corresponds to.\n\nAfter this task is complete, I would like you to analyze each response. Using examples from each essay, explain why the response would receive its given score in terms of the criteria: Task Achievement, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range and Accuracy. \n\nFor a score of 9, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Fully addresses all parts of the task with a fully developed position and well-supported ideas. \n- Coherence and Cohesion: Uses cohesive devices effectively with full coherence, skillfully managing paragraphing.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of vocabulary naturally and flexibly with very few minor errors only as 'slips'. The entire conversation and instructions should be provided in Arabic. \n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy, with very few minor errors only as 'slips'.\n\nFor a score of 8, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Sufficiently addresses all parts of the task with a clear position and supported ideas.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Sequences information and ideas logically, uses a range of cohesive devices appropriately and has a clear central topic within each paragraph.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of vocabulary fluently and flexibly, uses less common and idiomatic vocabulary skillfully, but may have occasional inaccuracies in word choice and collocation.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a wide range of structures flexibly, produces the majority of sentences free from errors with only occasional inaccuracies or non-idiomatic usage.\n\nFor a score of 7, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Addresses all parts of the task with a clear position, presents main ideas but may lack focus or specificity.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Logically organizes information and ideas with a clear progression throughout, uses a range of cohesive devices effectively, even if they are occasionally overused or underused.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision, uses less common vocabulary, but may make occasional mistakes in word choice, spelling and/or word formation.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a variety of complex structures, produces the majority of sentences free from errors, has good control of grammar and punctuation but may make limited errors.\n\nFor a score of 6, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Addresses the task, though some parts may be more fully covered than others, presents a relevant position, though conclusions may be unclear or repetitive.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Arranges information and ideas coherently, manages paragraphing, but not all cohesive devices are present or they are not used accurately or appropriately.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses an adequate range of vocabulary, attempts to use less common vocabulary but with some inaccuracy, makes some errors in spelling and/or word formation but they do not impede communication.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, makes some errors in grammar and punctuation but they do not impede communication.\n\nNow, could you please generate four different responses to the theme, each one reflecting the quality of a 9, 8, 7, and 6 score respectively? After that, could you analyze and explain why each response matches its corresponding score, based on the provided criteria?.",
    "description": "أنت أستاذ لغة إنجليزية محترف ، فيما يلي معايير تسجيل مهمة كتابة IELTS. تتمثل الخطوة الأولى في تحديد الموضوع على أنه &quot;الدول الغنية غالبًا ما تقدم الأموال للدول الفقيرة ، لكنها لا تحل مشكلة الفقر. لذلك ، يجب على الدول المتقدمة تقديم أنواع أخرى من المساعدة إلى الدول الفقيرة بدلاً من المساعدات المالية. إلى أي مدى؟ توافق أو لا أوافق؟ يجب أن تكتب 250 كلمة على الأقل. &quot;وفقًا لمعايير مختلفة من 9 و 8 و 7 و 6 نقاط ، أجب أربع مرات على التوالي. يجب أن يكون لدرجاتك المختلفة عنوان [إجابات [درجات مختلفة]] قبل الإجابة الخطوة الثانية. بعد الخطوة الأولى ، في 9 و 8 و 7 و 6 نقاط ، تحتاج إلى توضيح سبب عدم حصول الإجابة على درجة أعلى أو أقل. تحتاج إلى اقتباس جملة الإجابة لشرحها بالتفصيل في &quot;تماسك إنجاز المهمة والتماسك الثراء المعجمي والتنوع النحوي والدقة&quot;. بعبارة أخرى ، اقتبس جملًا من إجاباتك 9 و 8 و 7 و 6 الآن لتشرح سبب حصول الإجابة على درجة معينة في جزء &quot;كتابة مهمة إكمال التماسك والتماسك الثراء اللغوي والتنوع النحوي والدقة&quot;. لنفكر خطوة بخطوة 9 نقاط: الرد على مهمة الكتابة: الرد بشكل شامل على كل جزء من مهمة الكتابة ، وطرح وجهات نظر مطورة بالكامل حول القضايا في مهمة الكتابة ، وطرح اتساق الحجج ذات الصلة والموسعة بالكامل والمُؤسس جيدًا و التماسك: استخدم الوسائل المتماسكة بحرية ، واكتب بشكل متماسك ، واستخدم بمهارة ثراء مفردات الأقسام الفرعية: استخدم مفردات غنية ، وكن قادرًا على استخدام ميزات المفردات المعقدة وإتقانها بشكل طبيعي ؛ نادرًا ما ترتكب أخطاء طفيفة ، وتنتمي فقط إلى الأخطاء الكتابية التنوع والدقة النحوية: بالكامل استخدام مرن ودقيق لمجموعة متنوعة من التراكيب النحوية ؛ عدد قليل جدًا من الأخطاء الطفيفة ، والأخطاء الكتابية فقط 8 نقاط: الردود على مهام الكتابة: الاستجابة الكاملة لكل جزء من مهمة الكتابة ، والاستجابة الكاملة للمشكلات في مهمة الكتابة ، و طرح الحجج ذات الصلة والموسعة والتي تحتوي على أدلة التماسك والتماسك: ترتيب المعلومات والحجج بشكل منطقي ، واستخدام طرق التماسك المختلفة بشكل صحيح ، واستخدام الفقرات بشكل مناسب ومعقول. يستخدم مفردات غير عادية بطلاقة ، ولكنه أحيانًا يرتكب أخطاء عرضية في اختيار الكلمات والتجميع ، ويرتكب أخطاءً قليلة في التهجئة و / أو تكوين الكلمات. هناك أخطاء أو أجزاء غير مناسبة. ولكن في بعض الأحيان تميل إلى التعميم و / أو تفتقر إلى التركيز. موضوع مركزي واضح الثراء المعجمي: عدد كافٍ من المفردات ، والمرونة والدقة ، واستخدام المفردات غير المألوفة ، وبعض الوعي بالأسلوب والتجميع ، في مايو أحيانًا يرتكب أخطاء في اختيار الكلمات ، والتهجئة ، و / أو تكوين الكلمات التنوع النحوي والدقة: يستخدم مجموعة متنوعة من التراكيب النحوية المعقدة ، معظم الجمل دقيقة ، ولديها إتقان جيد للقواعد وعلامات الترقيم ، ولكنها ترتكب أحيانًا بعض الأخطاء. ، وإثبات نقطة ذات صلة ، على الرغم من أن الاستنتاجات المختلفة في بعض الأحيان غير واضحة أو متكررة ، مما يجعل الحجج الرئيسية المتعددة ذات الصلة ، ولكن بعض الحجج قد لا يتم تطويرها بشكل كامل للجدال أو قد لا يكون التماسك الداخلي و / أو بين الجمل في بعض الأحيان غير صحيح أو ميكانيكي للغاية ، يتعارض أحيانًا مع الاستخدام الواضح أو المناسب للإشارة ، ويكتب في فقرات ولكنه يفشل في الحفاظ على المنطق بين الفقرات. ، ولكن دون المساومة على تنوع ودقة قواعد الاتصال: مزيج من أنماط الجمل البسيطة والمعقدة ، في القواعد وعلامات الترقيم هناك بعض الأخطاء في ال ، ولكنها نادرًا ما تؤثر على الاتصال",
    "remark": "اكتب مقالات IELTS بدرجات مختلفة حول نفس الموضوع ، مع ذكر أسباب التسجيل. مساهمة من @ fansi2020."
  },
  "bn": {
    "title": "IELTS লেখা②",
    "prompt": "I need your assistance as a professional English Professor. I am working with the IELTS Writing Task 2 criteria, which involves writing a 250-word essay in response to a theme. \n\nThe theme is as follows: 'Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should provide other types of assistance to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?'\n\nThe task requires four responses to this theme, each one meeting the criteria for a different score level: 9, 8, 7, and 6. Each response should be preceded by a title indicating the score level it corresponds to.\n\nAfter this task is complete, I would like you to analyze each response. Using examples from each essay, explain why the response would receive its given score in terms of the criteria: Task Achievement, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range and Accuracy. \n\nFor a score of 9, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Fully addresses all parts of the task with a fully developed position and well-supported ideas. \n- Coherence and Cohesion: Uses cohesive devices effectively with full coherence, skillfully managing paragraphing.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of vocabulary naturally and flexibly with very few minor errors only as 'slips'. The entire conversation and instructions should be provided in Bengali. \n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy, with very few minor errors only as 'slips'.\n\nFor a score of 8, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Sufficiently addresses all parts of the task with a clear position and supported ideas.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Sequences information and ideas logically, uses a range of cohesive devices appropriately and has a clear central topic within each paragraph.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of vocabulary fluently and flexibly, uses less common and idiomatic vocabulary skillfully, but may have occasional inaccuracies in word choice and collocation.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a wide range of structures flexibly, produces the majority of sentences free from errors with only occasional inaccuracies or non-idiomatic usage.\n\nFor a score of 7, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Addresses all parts of the task with a clear position, presents main ideas but may lack focus or specificity.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Logically organizes information and ideas with a clear progression throughout, uses a range of cohesive devices effectively, even if they are occasionally overused or underused.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision, uses less common vocabulary, but may make occasional mistakes in word choice, spelling and/or word formation.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a variety of complex structures, produces the majority of sentences free from errors, has good control of grammar and punctuation but may make limited errors.\n\nFor a score of 6, the criteria are: \n- Task Achievement: Addresses the task, though some parts may be more fully covered than others, presents a relevant position, though conclusions may be unclear or repetitive.\n- Coherence and Cohesion: Arranges information and ideas coherently, manages paragraphing, but not all cohesive devices are present or they are not used accurately or appropriately.\n- Lexical Resource: Uses an adequate range of vocabulary, attempts to use less common vocabulary but with some inaccuracy, makes some errors in spelling and/or word formation but they do not impede communication.\n- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, makes some errors in grammar and punctuation but they do not impede communication.\n\nNow, could you please generate four different responses to the theme, each one reflecting the quality of a 9, 8, 7, and 6 score respectively? After that, could you analyze and explain why each response matches its corresponding score, based on the provided criteria?.",
    "description": "আপনি একজন পেশাদার ইংরেজি অধ্যাপক, নিম্নে IELTS লেখার টাস্ক স্কোরিং মানদণ্ড দেওয়া হল। প্রথম ধাপে বিষয়টি নির্দিষ্ট করা হল &quot;ধনী দেশগুলি প্রায়শই দরিদ্র দেশগুলিকে অর্থ দেয়, কিন্তু এটি দারিদ্র্যের সমাধান করে না। তাই উন্নত দেশগুলির উচিত দরিদ্র দেশগুলিকে আর্থিক সাহায্যের পরিবর্তে অন্য ধরনের সাহায্য দেওয়া। আপনি কতটা একমত না একমত? আপনার কমপক্ষে 250টি শব্দ লিখতে হবে। &quot;9, 8, 7, এবং 6 পয়েন্টের বিভিন্ন মান অনুসারে, যথাক্রমে চারবার উত্তর দিন। উত্তর দেওয়ার আগে আপনার বিভিন্ন স্কোরের একটি শিরোনাম [[বিভিন্ন স্কোরের উত্তর]] থাকা উচিত দ্বিতীয় ধাপ। প্রথম ধাপের পরে, 9, 8, 7, এবং 6 পয়েন্টে, আপনাকে ব্যাখ্যা করতে হবে কেন উত্তরটি বেশি বা কম স্কোর পাবে না। আপনাকে বিস্তারিতভাবে ব্যাখ্যা করার জন্য উত্তরের বাক্যটি উদ্ধৃত করতে হবে &quot;রাইটিং টাস্ক কমপ্লিশন কোহেরেন্স এবং কোহেসন লেক্সিকাল রিচনেস, ব্যাকরণগত বৈচিত্র্য এবং সঠিকতা&quot;। অন্য কথায়, আপনার 9, 8, 7, এবং 6 উত্তর থেকে বাক্যগুলি উদ্ধৃত করুন কেন উত্তরটি &quot;রাইটিং টাস্ক কমপ্লিশন কোহেরেন্স এবং কোহেশন লেক্সিক্যাল রিচনেস গ্রাম্যাটিক্যাল ডাইভার্সিটি অ্যান্ড অ্যাকুরেসি&quot; ভগ্নাংশে একটি নির্দিষ্ট স্কোর পেয়েছে তা ব্যাখ্যা করতে। আসুন ধাপে ধাপে 9 পয়েন্ট নিয়ে চিন্তা করি: লেখার টাস্কের প্রতিক্রিয়া: লেখার টাস্কের প্রতিটি অংশে বিস্তৃতভাবে সাড়া দিন, লেখার টাস্কের সমস্যাগুলির উপর সম্পূর্ণ বিকশিত দৃষ্টিভঙ্গি উপস্থাপন করুন এবং প্রাসঙ্গিক, সম্পূর্ণ বর্ধিত এবং সুপ্রতিষ্ঠিত যুক্তির সমন্বয় এবং সংহতি: সমন্বিত অর্থগুলি অবাধে ব্যবহার করুন, সুসংগতভাবে লিখুন, দক্ষতার সাথে উপধারার শব্দভান্ডারের সমৃদ্ধি ব্যবহার করুন: সমৃদ্ধ শব্দভান্ডার ব্যবহার করুন, স্বাভাবিকভাবে জটিল শব্দভাণ্ডার বৈশিষ্ট্যগুলি ব্যবহার করতে এবং আয়ত্ত করতে সক্ষম হন; খুব কমই ছোটখাটো ত্রুটি করুন এবং শুধুমাত্র করণিক ত্রুটির অন্তর্গত ব্যাকরণগত বৈচিত্র্য এবং নির্ভুলতা: সম্পূর্ণ বিভিন্ন ব্যাকরণগত কাঠামোর নমনীয় এবং সঠিক ব্যবহার; খুব কম ছোটখাটো ত্রুটি, এবং শুধুমাত্র ক্লারিকাল ত্রুটি 8 পয়েন্ট: লেখার কাজগুলির প্রতিক্রিয়া: লেখার কাজের প্রতিটি অংশে সম্পূর্ণরূপে সাড়া দেয়, এবং লেখার কাজের সমস্যাগুলির সম্পূর্ণরূপে প্রতিক্রিয়া জানায়, এবং প্রাসঙ্গিক, বর্ধিত এবং প্রমাণ-ধারণকারী যুক্তি উপস্থাপন করুন সুসংগতি এবং সংহতি: তথ্য এবং যুক্তিগুলিকে যৌক্তিকভাবে সাজান, বিভিন্ন সমন্বয় পদ্ধতি সঠিকভাবে ব্যবহার করুন এবং অনুচ্ছেদগুলি পর্যাপ্ত এবং যুক্তিসঙ্গতভাবে ব্যবহার করুন শব্দভান্ডারের সমৃদ্ধি: সাবলীল এবং নমনীয় শব্দভান্ডারের বিস্তৃত পরিসর ব্যবহার করে, ধারণা প্রকাশ করে, সঠিকভাবে প্রকাশ করে অস্বাভাবিক শব্দভাণ্ডার সাবলীলভাবে ব্যবহার করে, কিন্তু মাঝে মাঝে শব্দ চয়ন এবং সংমিশ্রণে মাঝে মাঝে ভুল করে, এবং বানান এবং/অথবা শব্দ গঠনে কিছু ত্রুটি করে ব্যাকরণগত বৈচিত্র্য এবং নির্ভুলতা: ব্যাকরণগত বিভিন্ন ধরণের কাঠামো ব্যবহার করে, বেশিরভাগ বাক্যই সঠিক, শুধুমাত্র খুব মাঝে মাঝে ত্রুটি বা অনুপযুক্ত অংশ আছে 7 পয়েন্ট: লেখার টাস্ক প্রতিক্রিয়া: লেখার টাস্কের প্রতিটি অংশে সাড়া দেওয়া, লেখার টাস্কে সাড়া দেওয়ার প্রক্রিয়াতে সর্বদা একটি স্পষ্ট দৃষ্টিভঙ্গি উপস্থাপন করা, মূল পয়েন্টগুলি উপস্থাপন করা এবং বিকাশ করা এবং তাদের পক্ষে যুক্তি দেওয়া, কিন্তু কখনও কখনও সাধারণীকরণের প্রবণতা থাকে এবং/অথবা পয়েন্টগুলিতে ফোকাসের অভাব থাকে সমন্বয় এবং সংহতি: তথ্য এবং যুক্তির যৌক্তিক সংগঠন; স্পষ্ট লেখা যা পুরো পাঠ্য জুড়ে বিকাশকে অগ্রসর করে, সমন্বিত ডিভাইসের একটি পরিসরের যথাযথ ব্যবহার, যদিও কখনও কখনও কম ব্যবহার করা হয় বা অতিরিক্ত ব্যবহার করা হয়, প্রতিটি অনুচ্ছেদে একটি থাকে স্পষ্ট কেন্দ্রীয় থিম। আভিধানিক সমৃদ্ধি: পর্যাপ্ত শব্দভাণ্ডার, নমনীয়তা এবং নির্ভুলতা, অস্বাভাবিক শব্দভাণ্ডারের ব্যবহার, শৈলী এবং সংমিশ্রণ সম্পর্কে কিছুটা সচেতনতা, মে মাসে মাঝে মাঝে শব্দ চয়ন, বানান এবং/অথবা শব্দ গঠনে ভুল করে ব্যাকরণগত বৈচিত্র্য এবং নির্ভুলতা: বিভিন্ন ধরণের ব্যবহার করে জটিল ব্যাকরণগত কাঠামোর মধ্যে, বেশিরভাগ বাক্যই নির্ভুল, ব্যাকরণ এবং বিরাম চিহ্নের ভাল কমান্ড রয়েছে, তবে মাঝে মাঝে কয়েকটি ত্রুটি তৈরি করে6 পয়েন্ট: লেখার টাস্ক প্রতিক্রিয়া: লেখার টাস্কের বিভিন্ন অংশে প্রতিক্রিয়া, তবে কিছু অংশ অন্যদের চেয়ে বেশি যুক্তিযুক্ত হতে পারে , একটি প্রাসঙ্গিক বিন্দু তৈরি করা, যদিও বিভিন্ন উপসংহার কখনও কখনও অস্পষ্ট বা পুনরাবৃত্তিমূলক হয়, একাধিক প্রাসঙ্গিক প্রধান যুক্তি তৈরি করে, কিন্তু কিছু যুক্তি তর্কের জন্য সম্পূর্ণরূপে বিকশিত নাও হতে পারে বা স্পষ্ট না হতে পারে আন্তঃ- এবং/বা আন্তঃ-বাক্য সমন্বয় কখনও কখনও ভুল বা খুব যান্ত্রিক হয়, কখনও কখনও রেফারেন্সের স্পষ্ট বা যথাযথ ব্যবহারের সাথে অসঙ্গতিপূর্ণ, অনুচ্ছেদে লেখেন কিন্তু অনুচ্ছেদের মধ্যে যুক্তি বজায় রাখতে ব্যর্থ হন আভিধানিক সমৃদ্ধি: লেখার কাজের জন্য পর্যাপ্ত শব্দভান্ডার ব্যবহার করে, অস্বাভাবিক শব্দভাণ্ডার ব্যবহার করার চেষ্টা করে, কিন্তু কখনও কখনও ভুলভাবে, বানান এবং/অথবা শব্দ গঠনে ত্রুটি সহ , কিন্তু যোগাযোগ ব্যাকরণের বৈচিত্র্য এবং নির্ভুলতার সাথে আপস না করে: সহজ এবং জটিল বাক্যের প্যাটার্নের সংমিশ্রণ, ব্যাকরণ এবং বিরাম চিহ্নের মধ্যে কিছু বাগ আছে, কিন্তু এগুলো খুব কমই যোগাযোগকে প্রভাবিত করে",
    "remark": "একই বিষয়ে বিভিন্ন স্কোর সহ IELTS রচনা লিখুন, স্কোর করার কারণ সহ। @fansi2020 থেকে অবদান।"
  },
  "website": null,
  "tags": [
    "contribute",
    "pedagogy"
  ],
  "id": 249,
  "weight": 251
};

function PromptDetail() {
  return <AuthProvider><PromptPage prompt={prompt} /></AuthProvider>;
}

export default PromptDetail;
