{% extends "openstack/_base_openstack.html" %}
{% block title %}OpenStack distributions comparison{% endblock %}
{% block meta_description %}A detailed comparison of various OpenStack platforms including both business and technical aspects of each.{% endblock%}
{% block meta_copydoc %}https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ibpATi-e0rKP3GaLgvzwO_XyFU9ZTsUaCHMwrg96MZM/edit{% endblock %}
{% block content %}
Looking for a detailed OpenStack distributions comparison? Have a look at the table below and see how Canonical's Charmed OpenStack differs from other distributions. Discover more by clicking on each Charmed OpenStack cell. Not sure what is OpenStack? Find more more here. Canonical’s solution was a third of the price of the other proposals we’d received. The solution is also proving to be highly cost-effective, both from CAPEX and OPEX perspectives. By applying a per host pricing model to the subscription structure and offering design and delivery at a fixed price, Canonical's Charmed OpenStack is cheaper than Red Hat OpenStack Platform. Moreover, no license is required to get started with Charmed OpenStack. This means that organisations only have to pay for the environments that require enterprise support, such as the production environment, while they can run their testing and development environments free of charge. Instead of relying on random interconnected tools, Canonical leverages the concept of operators for OpenStack deployments, operations and upgrades. OpenStack Charms enable model-driven architecture and abstract the entire OpenStack complexity. This results in a simpler OpenStack platform, fewer resources required to maintain it and reduced operational costs. Canonical's Charmed OpenStack is fully open source which allows it to benefit from a broader community, faster development process and wider selection of technology choices than those available in VMware's platform. Choosing an open source platform avoids vendor lock-in and significantly reduces infrastructure costs. Public clouds are expensive when running workloads in the long-term and at scale. Although they are a more economical solution at the beginning of the cloud transformation process, their costs keep growing over time. Canonical's Charmed OpenStack is a cost-efficient extension to public cloud infrastructure, ensuring lower TCO per VM and enabling businesses to run their workloads where it makes the most sense from an economical point of view. Let our expert cloud team help with:
OpenStack distributions: a comparison
{{
image(
url="https://assets.ubuntu.com/v1/563c0d9b-_Canonical.svg",
alt="Canonical",
height="30",
width="105",
hi_def=True,
attrs={"class": ""},
loading="lazy",
) | safe
}}
{{
image(
url="https://assets.ubuntu.com/v1/82c62241-red-hat-2019-primary.svg",
alt="",
height="30",
width="127",
hi_def=True,
attrs={"class": ""},
loading="auto",
) | safe
}}
{{
image(
url="https://assets.ubuntu.com/v1/3ea3fad9-mirantis_logo.svg",
alt="",
height="30",
width="52",
hi_def=True,
attrs={"class": ""},
loading="lazy",
) | safe
}}
Pricing
$$$$$
$$$
Fixed-price delivery
-
-
Managed OpenStack
-
Support pricing
Per socket-pair
Per host + base price for the control plane
Release cadence
6 months with a LTS every 18 months
No predictable release cadence
Maximum support timeline
5 years
3 years
OpenStack deployment mechanism
Red Hat OpenStack Platform Director (based on TripleO)
DriveTrain (based on Git, Gerrit, Jenkins and SaltStack)
Bare-metal provisioning tool
OpenStack Ironic
MAAS
Operating System management tool
Red Hat Satellite
Not provided
Hypervisors
KVM
KVM
Networking
OVN, OVS, Juniper Contrail, Cisco ACI
OVS, Tungsten Fabric, Calico
Storage
Ceph, NFS
Ceph
Containerised control plane
-
Fully automated upgrades
-
More economical than Red Hat OpenStack Platform
More straightforward than Mirantis Cloud Platform
Open source unlike VMware
More cost-efficient than public clouds
Contact us