[==========] Running 1 test from 1 test suite.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 1 test from Stroika_Performance_Tests
[ RUN      ] Stroika_Performance_Tests.all
Performance score 1.0 means both sides equal (ratio), and tests setup so lower is generally better

[[[Started testing at: Mon Oct 28 16:23:13 2024]]]

Using TIME MULTIPLIER: 15

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v shared_ptr copy) (mutex vs shared_ptr<> copy)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.93
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.28327 secs, and comparison 4.9056 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.9, and perfScore=0.928517]
	                 	shared_ptr<> copy is FASTER
	                 	{{{WARNING - expected performance score less than 0.9 and got 0.928517}}}

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v SpinLock) (mutex vs SpinLock)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.44
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.61472 secs, and comparison 2.93047 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.51, and perfScore=0.443022]
	                 	SpinLock is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.37
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.38606 secs, and comparison 2.39304 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.49, and perfScore=0.374728]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying2 (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.47
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.23619 secs, and comparison 2.93508 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.45, and perfScore=0.470653]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER
	                 	{{{WARNING - expected performance score less than 0.45 and got 0.470653}}}

Test Simple String append test (+='string object') 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	4.6
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.97007 secs, and comparison 31.8416 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 4.9, and perfScore=4.56832]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.51667 secs, and comparison 30.3341 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 4.1, and perfScore=4.03557]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 100x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	72
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.81464 secs, and comparison 419.443 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 78, and perfScore=72.1356]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test String a + b (wstring vs String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.6
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.664 secs, and comparison 8.82434 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.1, and perfScore=1.55797]
	                 	String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream << test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.37175 secs, and comparison 7.08197 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.4, and perfScore=1.31837]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test String::substr() (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.8
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.34143 secs, and comparison 9.86531 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.7, and perfScore=1.84694]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***
	                 	{{{WARNING - expected performance score less than 1.7 and got 1.84694}}}

Test wstringstream versus BasicTextOutputStream (wstringstream vs MemoryStream<Characters::Character>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.47327 secs, and comparison 8.48083 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.2, and perfScore=1.31013]
	                 	MemoryStream<Characters::Character> is ***SLOWER***
	                 	{{{WARNING - expected performance score less than 1.2 and got 1.31013}}}

Test wstringstream versus StringBuilder (wstringstream vs StringBuilder)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.45
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.80958 secs, and comparison 3.09412 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.48, and perfScore=0.454377]
	                 	StringBuilder is FASTER

Test Simple c_str() test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.1656 secs, and comparison 13.7593 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.131]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.66
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.2123 secs, and comparison 5.38321 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.75, and perfScore=0.655505]
	                 	Sequence<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.23
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.26689 secs, and comparison 1.65193 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.33, and perfScore=0.227322]
	                 	Sequence<string> is FASTER

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	8.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.97594 secs, and comparison 66.9301 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 5.1, and perfScore=8.39149]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> is ***SLOWER***
	                 	{{{WARNING - expected performance score less than 5.1 and got 8.39149}}}

Test Sequence_Array<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_Array<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.66
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.93209 secs, and comparison 5.24988 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.7, and perfScore=0.661854]
	                 	Sequence_Array<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence_stdvector<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_stdvector<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.9
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.93822 secs, and comparison 7.14131 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.1, and perfScore=0.899612]
	                 	Sequence_stdvector<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.84
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.27321 secs, and comparison 6.09586 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.55, and perfScore=0.838125]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> is FASTER
	                 	{{{WARNING - expected performance score less than 0.55 and got 0.838125}}}

Test Collection<int> basics (vector<int> vs Collection<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	9.6
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.39125 secs, and comparison 80.1886 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 4.9, and perfScore=9.55621]
	                 	Collection<int> is ***SLOWER***
	                 	{{{WARNING - expected performance score less than 4.9 and got 9.55621}}}

Test Collection<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.32906 secs, and comparison 8.83756 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.85, and perfScore=1.20583]
	                 	Collection<string> is ***SLOWER***
	                 	{{{WARNING - expected performance score less than 0.85 and got 1.20583}}}

Test Collection_LinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_LinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.85
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.27547 secs, and comparison 6.21841 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.854709]
	                 	Collection_LinkedList<string> is FASTER
	                 	{{{WARNING - expected performance score less than 0.6 and got 0.854709}}}

Test Collection_stdforward_list<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdforward_list<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.85
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.21782 secs, and comparison 6.13604 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.850124]
	                 	Collection_stdforward_list<string> is FASTER
	                 	{{{WARNING - expected performance score less than 0.6 and got 0.850124}}}

Test SortedCollection_stdmultiset<string> basics (vector<string> vs SortedCollection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.27402 secs, and comparison 8.89555 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1, and perfScore=1.22292]
	                 	SortedCollection_stdmultiset<string> is ***SLOWER***
	                 	{{{WARNING - expected performance score less than 1 and got 1.22292}}}

Test SortedCollection_stdmultiset<string> basics with rnd strings (vector<string> vs SortedCollection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.6
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.72037 secs, and comparison 12.2963 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.59271]
	                 	SortedCollection_stdmultiset<string> is ***SLOWER***
	                 	{{{WARNING - expected performance score less than 1.3 and got 1.59271}}}

Test std::set<int> vs Set<int> (set<int> vs Set<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.25
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 38.7645 secs, and comparison 9.82108 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.21, and perfScore=0.253352]
	                 	Set<int> is FASTER
	                 	{{{WARNING - expected performance score less than 0.21 and got 0.253352}}}

Test String Characters::Format () (sprintf vs String Characters::Format)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	3.5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.45564 secs, and comparison 19.173 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.8, and perfScore=3.51434]
	                 	String Characters::Format is ***SLOWER***
	                 	{{{WARNING - expected performance score less than 1.8 and got 3.51434}}}

Test BLOB versus vector<byte> (vector<byte> vs BLOB)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.05508 secs, and comparison 6.06013 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1, and perfScore=1.00083]
	                 	BLOB is ***SLOWER***
	                 	{{{WARNING - expected performance score less than 1 and got 1.00083}}}

Test BLOB versus vector<byte> ver#2 (vector<byte> vs BLOB)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.91
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.00951 secs, and comparison 7.32457 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.85, and perfScore=0.914484]
	                 	BLOB is FASTER
	                 	{{{WARNING - expected performance score less than 0.85 and got 0.914484}}}

Test Test_JSONReadWriteFile (15 seconds vs Test_JSONReadWriteFile)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.31
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 4.70108 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.313405]
	                 	Test_JSONReadWriteFile is FASTER

Test Test_Optional_ (15 seconds vs Test_Optional_)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.18
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 2.65194 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.176796]
	                 	Test_Optional_ is FASTER

stroika-json-native-parser: ".\\Tests\\52\\JSONTestData\\small-dict.json"
	DETAILS			0.273888 seconds

stroika-json-native-parser: ".\\Tests\\52\\JSONTestData\\medium-dict.json"
	DETAILS			3.65448 seconds

stroika-json-native-parser: ".\\Tests\\52\\JSONTestData\\large-dict.json"
	DETAILS			13.236 seconds

stroika-json-parser: ".\\Tests\\52\\JSONTestData\\small-dict.json"
	DETAILS			0.110986 seconds

stroika-json-parser: ".\\Tests\\52\\JSONTestData\\medium-dict.json"
	DETAILS			1.62063 seconds

stroika-json-parser: ".\\Tests\\52\\JSONTestData\\large-dict.json"
	DETAILS			7.67603 seconds

boost_json-parser: ".\\Tests\\52\\JSONTestData\\small-dict.json"
	DETAILS			0.0325757 seconds

boost_json-parser: ".\\Tests\\52\\JSONTestData\\medium-dict.json"
	DETAILS			0.460607 seconds

boost_json-parser: ".\\Tests\\52\\JSONTestData\\large-dict.json"
	DETAILS			1.55957 seconds

boost_json-vv-parser: ".\\Tests\\52\\JSONTestData\\small-dict.json"
	DETAILS			0.14033 seconds

boost_json-vv-parser: ".\\Tests\\52\\JSONTestData\\medium-dict.json"
	DETAILS			1.82378 seconds

boost_json-vv-parser: ".\\Tests\\52\\JSONTestData\\large-dict.json"
	DETAILS			7.73789 seconds

[[[Tests took: 18 minutes, 4 seconds]]]

[       OK ] Stroika_Performance_Tests.all (1083516 ms)
[----------] 1 test from Stroika_Performance_Tests (1083516 ms total)

[----------] Global test environment tear-down
[==========] 1 test from 1 test suite ran. (1083516 ms total)
[  PASSED  ] 1 test.
