Performance score 1.0 means both sides equal (ratio), and tests setup so lower is generally better

[[[Started testing at: Mon Jul 10 17:19:2 2023   ]]]

Using TIME MULTIPLIER: 15

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v shared_ptr copy)    (mutex    vs shared_ptr<> copy   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.5   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 3.24118 secs, and comparison 4.82593 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=1.48894]
	                 	shared_ptr<> copy    is ***SLOWER***

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v SpinLock)    (mutex    vs SpinLock   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.71   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 3.19508 secs, and comparison 2.27806 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.712991]
	                 	SpinLock    is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying    (wstring    vs Charactes::String   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.28   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 4.06624 secs, and comparison 1.15785 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.48, and perfScore=0.284747]
	                 	Charactes::String    is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying2    (wstring    vs Charactes::String   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.42   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 3.93602 secs, and comparison 1.63417 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.57, and perfScore=0.415184]
	                 	Charactes::String    is FASTER

Test Simple String append test (+='string object') 10x    (wstring    vs Charactes::String   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.6   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.06374 secs, and comparison 13.1435 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.59561]
	                 	Charactes::String    is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 10x    (wstring    vs Charactes::String   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.3   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.34398 secs, and comparison 14.7069 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.31824]
	                 	Charactes::String    is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 100x    (wstring    vs Charactes::String   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	22   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.58261 secs, and comparison 168.992 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 24, and perfScore=22.2868]
	                 	Charactes::String    is ***SLOWER***

Test String a + b    (wstring    vs String   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.6   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 2.19661 secs, and comparison 5.78405 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.7, and perfScore=2.63317]
	                 	String    is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream << test    (wstring    vs Charactes::String   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.2   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 4.77926 secs, and comparison 5.6272 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=1.17742]
	                 	Charactes::String    is ***SLOWER***

Test String::substr()    (wstring    vs Charactes::String   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.1   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 2.58354 secs, and comparison 5.39454 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.1, and perfScore=2.08804]
	                 	Charactes::String    is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream versus BasicTextOutputStream    (wstringstream    vs MemoryStream<Characters::Character>   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.7   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.01793 secs, and comparison 3.49549 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.6, and perfScore=0.696599]
	                 	MemoryStream<Characters::Character>    is FASTER

Test wstringstream versus StringBuilder    (wstringstream    vs StringBuilder   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.36   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.26102 secs, and comparison 1.91808 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.23, and perfScore=0.364583]
	                 	StringBuilder    is FASTER

Test Simple c_str() test    (wstring    vs Charactes::String   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.1   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.9097 secs, and comparison 14.7783 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.14474]
	                 	Charactes::String    is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence<int> basics    (vector<int>    vs Sequence<int>   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.4   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 3.68718 secs, and comparison 5.14695 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.2, and perfScore=1.3959]
	                 	Sequence<int>    is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence<string> basics    (vector<string>    vs Sequence<string>   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.34   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 2.04497 secs, and comparison 0.693264 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.33, and perfScore=0.33901]
	                 	Sequence<string>    is FASTER

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> basics    (vector<int>    vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int>   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	11   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 3.56165 secs, and comparison 38.5236 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 6, and perfScore=10.8162]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int>    is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence_Array<int> basics    (vector<int>    vs Sequence_Array<int>   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.4   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 3.56229 secs, and comparison 4.93377 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.8, and perfScore=1.385]
	                 	Sequence_Array<int>    is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence_stdvector<int> basics    (vector<int>    vs Sequence_stdvector<int>   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.9   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 3.56224 secs, and comparison 6.60889 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.4, and perfScore=1.85526]
	                 	Sequence_stdvector<int>    is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> basics    (vector<string>    vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string>   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.6   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 2.04517 secs, and comparison 3.17941 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=1.55459]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string>    is ***SLOWER***

Test Collection<int> basics    (vector<int>    vs Collection<int>   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	5.6   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 4.83044 secs, and comparison 27.1541 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 4.4, and perfScore=5.62145]
	                 	Collection<int>    is ***SLOWER***

Test Collection<string> basics    (vector<string>    vs Collection<string>   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.3   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 1.98516 secs, and comparison 2.5343 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=1.27662]
	                 	Collection<string>    is ***SLOWER***

Test Collection_LinkedList<string> basics    (vector<string>    vs Collection_LinkedList<string>   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.6   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 1.9891 secs, and comparison 3.09533 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=1.55614]
	                 	Collection_LinkedList<string>    is ***SLOWER***

Test Collection_stdforward_list<string> basics    (vector<string>    vs Collection_stdforward_list<string>   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.6   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 1.98877 secs, and comparison 3.09532 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=1.5564]
	                 	Collection_stdforward_list<string>    is ***SLOWER***

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics    (vector<string>    vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.3   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 1.98841 secs, and comparison 2.54103 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.27792]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string>    is ***SLOWER***

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics with rnd strings    (vector<string>    vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	3.5   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 2.34896 secs, and comparison 8.25605 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=3.51477]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string>    is ***SLOWER***

Test std::set<int> vs Set<int>    (set<int>    vs Set<int>   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.15   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 27.8934 secs, and comparison 4.12168 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.3, and perfScore=0.147765]
	                 	Set<int>    is FASTER

Test String Characters::Format ()    (sprintf    vs String Characters::Format   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.2   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.61829 secs, and comparison 10.3147 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=1.19683]
	                 	String Characters::Format    is ***SLOWER***

Test BLOB versus vector<byte>    (vector<byte>    vs BLOB   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.1   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 2.4939 secs, and comparison 5.20003 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.55, and perfScore=2.0851]
	                 	BLOB    is ***SLOWER***

Test Test_JSONReadWriteFile    (15.000000 seconds    vs Test_JSONReadWriteFile   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.022   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 0.334722 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.1, and perfScore=0.0223148]
	                 	Test_JSONReadWriteFile    is FASTER

Test Test_Optional_    (15.000000 seconds    vs Test_Optional_   )
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.11   
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 1.64048 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.109366]
	                 	Test_Optional_    is FASTER

stroika-json-native-parser: "./Tests/52/JSONTestData/small-dict.json"
	DETAILS			0.123266 seconds

stroika-json-native-parser: "./Tests/52/JSONTestData/medium-dict.json"
	DETAILS			1.63394 seconds

stroika-json-native-parser: "./Tests/52/JSONTestData/large-dict.json"
	DETAILS			5.62466 seconds

stroika-json-parser: "./Tests/52/JSONTestData/small-dict.json"
	DETAILS			0.0631104 seconds

stroika-json-parser: "./Tests/52/JSONTestData/medium-dict.json"
	DETAILS			1.16624 seconds

stroika-json-parser: "./Tests/52/JSONTestData/large-dict.json"
	DETAILS			3.96468 seconds

boost_json-parser: "./Tests/52/JSONTestData/small-dict.json"
	DETAILS			0.0252078 seconds

boost_json-parser: "./Tests/52/JSONTestData/medium-dict.json"
	DETAILS			0.309446 seconds

boost_json-parser: "./Tests/52/JSONTestData/large-dict.json"
	DETAILS			0.989702 seconds

boost_json-vv-parser: "./Tests/52/JSONTestData/small-dict.json"
	DETAILS			0.0632342 seconds

boost_json-vv-parser: "./Tests/52/JSONTestData/medium-dict.json"
	DETAILS			1.16207 seconds

boost_json-vv-parser: "./Tests/52/JSONTestData/large-dict.json"
	DETAILS			3.94728 seconds

[[[Tests took: 8 minutes, 49 seconds   ]]]

Succeeded
