Performance score 1.0 means both sides equal (ratio), and tests setup so lower is generally better

[[[Started testing at: Tue Mar 23 1:39:40 2021]]]

Using TIME MULTIPLIER: 15

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v shared_ptr copy) (mutex vs shared_ptr<> copy)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.53
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.2759 secs, and comparison 5.45828 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.62, and perfScore=0.531174]
	                 	shared_ptr<> copy is FASTER

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v SpinLock) (mutex vs SpinLock)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.38
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.2713 secs, and comparison 3.94227 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.383816]
	                 	SpinLock is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.83
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.9825 secs, and comparison 9.90583 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.05, and perfScore=0.826692]
	                 	SharedPtr is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.39
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.4756 secs, and comparison 4.45925 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.48, and perfScore=0.388584]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying2 (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.41
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.5487 secs, and comparison 4.72822 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.57, and perfScore=0.409415]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple String append test (+='string object') 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.4213 secs, and comparison 29.2191 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.17707]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.1515 secs, and comparison 31.6354 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.40546]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 100x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	8.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.6429 secs, and comparison 101.883 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 9.7, and perfScore=8.05851]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test String a + b (wstring vs String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.49 secs, and comparison 13.221 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.6, and perfScore=1.15065]
	                 	String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream << test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.85
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 16.03 secs, and comparison 13.6683 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=0.852667]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test String::substr() (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.59438 secs, and comparison 13.5395 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.1, and perfScore=1.41119]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream versus BasicTextOutputStream (wstringstream vs MemoryStream<Characters::Character>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.77
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.7255 secs, and comparison 10.6182 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=0.773611]
	                 	MemoryStream<Characters::Character> is FASTER

Test wstringstream versus StringBuilder (wstringstream vs StringBuilder)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.22
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 14.3228 secs, and comparison 3.15919 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.23, and perfScore=0.22057]
	                 	StringBuilder is FASTER

Test Simple c_str() test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 14.4157 secs, and comparison 14.9226 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.03516]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.45
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 18.3052 secs, and comparison 8.1509 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.2, and perfScore=0.445279]
	                 	Sequence<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.18
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.1061 secs, and comparison 2.05221 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.33, and perfScore=0.184782]
	                 	Sequence<string> is FASTER

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.7
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 17.9116 secs, and comparison 48.2802 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 6, and perfScore=2.69547]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.41
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.6506 secs, and comparison 4.77657 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.409984]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection<int> basics (vector<int> vs Collection<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 18.3976 secs, and comparison 43.3122 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 4.4, and perfScore=2.35423]
	                 	Collection<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Collection<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.42
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.3327 secs, and comparison 4.7758 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.421418]
	                 	Collection<string> is FASTER

Test String Chracters::Format () (sprintf vs String Characters::Format)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 17.3826 secs, and comparison 21.155 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=1.21702]
	                 	String Characters::Format is ***SLOWER***

Test BLOB versus vector<byte> (vector<byte> vs BLOB)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.44
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.9364 secs, and comparison 4.81971 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.55, and perfScore=0.440703]
	                 	BLOB is FASTER

Test Test_JSONReadWriteFile (15.000000 seconds vs Test_JSONReadWriteFile)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.11
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 1.71344 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.25, and perfScore=0.11423]
	                 	Test_JSONReadWriteFile is FASTER

Test Test_Optional_ (15.000000 seconds vs Test_Optional_)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.27
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 4.00873 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.267248]
	                 	Test_Optional_ is FASTER

Test UTF82WString win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.1622 secs, and comparison 18.6218 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2, and perfScore=1.41479]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

Test WString2UTF8 win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.8
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.5803 secs, and comparison 35.6381 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 3.1, and perfScore=2.83284]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

[[[Tests took: 13 minutes, 1 second]]]

Succeeded
