Performance score 1.0 means both sides equal (ratio), and tests setup so lower is generally better

[[[Started testing at: Mon Mar 22 3:9: 2021]]]

Using TIME MULTIPLIER: 15

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v shared_ptr copy) (mutex vs shared_ptr<> copy)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.51
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.82994 secs, and comparison 5.05074 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.62, and perfScore=0.513812]
	                 	shared_ptr<> copy is FASTER

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v SpinLock) (mutex vs SpinLock)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.35
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.77519 secs, and comparison 3.38332 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.346113]
	                 	SpinLock is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.84
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.8976 secs, and comparison 9.14459 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.05, and perfScore=0.839139]
	                 	SharedPtr is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.37
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.3637 secs, and comparison 4.19628 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.48, and perfScore=0.36927]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying2 (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.171 secs, and comparison 4.44826 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.57, and perfScore=0.398196]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple String append test (+='string object') 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.8844 secs, and comparison 26.4214 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.2232]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.2134 secs, and comparison 28.3237 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.31907]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 100x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	7.7
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.1941 secs, and comparison 93.8717 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 9.7, and perfScore=7.69813]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test String a + b (wstring vs String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.73484 secs, and comparison 12.4189 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.6, and perfScore=1.27572]
	                 	String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream << test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.9
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 16.054 secs, and comparison 14.4073 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=0.897425]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test String::substr() (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.90279 secs, and comparison 12.2467 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.1, and perfScore=1.37561]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream versus BasicTextOutputStream (wstringstream vs MemoryStream<Characters::Character>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.78
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.3884 secs, and comparison 10.4414 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=0.779881]
	                 	MemoryStream<Characters::Character> is FASTER

Test wstringstream versus StringBuilder (wstringstream vs StringBuilder)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.8341 secs, and comparison 2.70834 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.23, and perfScore=0.195773]
	                 	StringBuilder is FASTER

Test Simple c_str() test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.8815 secs, and comparison 13.5308 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.0504]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.75
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.2269 secs, and comparison 7.686 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.2, and perfScore=0.751549]
	                 	Sequence<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.21
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.17053 secs, and comparison 1.91028 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.33, and perfScore=0.208306]
	                 	Sequence<string> is FASTER

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	4.6
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.62422 secs, and comparison 44.6458 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 6, and perfScore=4.6389]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.45
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.40312 secs, and comparison 4.22131 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.448926]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection<int> basics (vector<int> vs Collection<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	3.7
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.7694 secs, and comparison 39.6594 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 4.4, and perfScore=3.6826]
	                 	Collection<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Collection<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.47
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.2179 secs, and comparison 4.36827 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.47389]
	                 	Collection<string> is FASTER

Test String Chracters::Format () (sprintf vs String Characters::Format)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.444 secs, and comparison 17.7947 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=1.42998]
	                 	String Characters::Format is ***SLOWER***

Test BLOB versus vector<byte> (vector<byte> vs BLOB)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.28
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15.4953 secs, and comparison 4.39204 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.55, and perfScore=0.283443]
	                 	BLOB is FASTER

Test Test_JSONReadWriteFile (15.000000 seconds vs Test_JSONReadWriteFile)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.098
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 1.47013 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.25, and perfScore=0.098009]
	                 	Test_JSONReadWriteFile is FASTER

Test Test_Optional_ (15.000000 seconds vs Test_Optional_)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.25
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 3.69765 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.24651]
	                 	Test_Optional_ is FASTER

Test UTF82WString win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.8493 secs, and comparison 18.1391 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2, and perfScore=1.41168]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

Test WString2UTF8 win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.8659 secs, and comparison 34.0492 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 3.1, and perfScore=2.45561]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

[[[Tests took: 11 minutes, 46 seconds]]]

Succeeded
