Performance score 1.0 means both sides equal (ratio), and tests setup so lower is generally better

[[[Started testing at: Mon Jan 31 13:24:47 2022]]]

Using TIME MULTIPLIER: 15

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v shared_ptr copy) (mutex vs shared_ptr<> copy)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.8
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.16185 secs, and comparison 4.12575 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.799278]
	                 	shared_ptr<> copy is FASTER

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v SpinLock) (mutex vs SpinLock)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.44
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.39885 secs, and comparison 2.4023 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.444966]
	                 	SpinLock is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.91
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.61473 secs, and comparison 6.8925 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.05, and perfScore=0.905154]
	                 	SharedPtr is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr (make_shared) versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.43764 secs, and comparison 7.40856 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.15, and perfScore=1.15082]
	                 	SharedPtr is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.36
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.10131 secs, and comparison 2.58747 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.48, and perfScore=0.364365]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying2 (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.45
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.09623 secs, and comparison 3.21962 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.57, and perfScore=0.453709]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple String append test (+='string object') 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.8
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.98795 secs, and comparison 19.3231 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.7652]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.7
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.15272 secs, and comparison 19.5146 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.72828]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 100x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	22
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.06606 secs, and comparison 131.878 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 24, and perfScore=21.7402]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test String a + b (wstring vs String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.9
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.52434 secs, and comparison 10.3806 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.7, and perfScore=1.87907]
	                 	String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream << test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.94662 secs, and comparison 5.97325 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=1.00448]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test String::substr() (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.17816 secs, and comparison 12.4505 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.1, and perfScore=2.40442]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream versus BasicTextOutputStream (wstringstream vs MemoryStream<Characters::Character>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.71
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.92382 secs, and comparison 4.8966 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.6, and perfScore=0.707211]
	                 	MemoryStream<Characters::Character> is FASTER

Test wstringstream versus StringBuilder (wstringstream vs StringBuilder)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.097
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.22816 secs, and comparison 0.703548 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.23, and perfScore=0.0973343]
	                 	StringBuilder is FASTER

Test Simple c_str() test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.2601 secs, and comparison 13.0947 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.06808]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.59
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.14341 secs, and comparison 5.39231 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.2, and perfScore=0.589748]
	                 	Sequence<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.24
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.74599 secs, and comparison 1.84196 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.33, and perfScore=0.237796]
	                 	Sequence<string> is FASTER

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.49314 secs, and comparison 42.0486 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 6, and perfScore=4.95088]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence_Array<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_Array<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.61
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.76884 secs, and comparison 5.36011 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.8, and perfScore=0.611268]
	                 	Sequence_Array<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence_stdvector<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_stdvector<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.94
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.72016 secs, and comparison 8.18074 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.4, and perfScore=0.938142]
	                 	Sequence_stdvector<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.44
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.3563 secs, and comparison 3.69522 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.442208]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection<int> basics (vector<int> vs Collection<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	4.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.40179 secs, and comparison 38.0779 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 4.4, and perfScore=4.05007]
	                 	Collection<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Collection<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.44
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.21253 secs, and comparison 3.18666 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.441824]
	                 	Collection<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_LinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_LinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.44
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.17411 secs, and comparison 3.18997 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.44465]
	                 	Collection_LinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdforward_list<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdforward_list<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.44
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.20355 secs, and comparison 3.19191 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.443102]
	                 	Collection_stdforward_list<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.68
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.16471 secs, and comparison 4.88297 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=0.681532]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics with rnd strings (vector<string> vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.744 secs, and comparison 7.97747 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.03015]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string> is ***SLOWER***

Test std::set<int> vs Set<int> (set<int> vs Set<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.13
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 36.7545 secs, and comparison 4.80786 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.3, and perfScore=0.13081]
	                 	Set<int> is FASTER

Test String Characters::Format () (sprintf vs String Characters::Format)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.6
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.75919 secs, and comparison 9.06776 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=1.57449]
	                 	String Characters::Format is ***SLOWER***

Test BLOB versus vector<byte> (vector<byte> vs BLOB)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.42
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.92047 secs, and comparison 2.50485 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.55, and perfScore=0.423082]
	                 	BLOB is FASTER

Test Test_JSONReadWriteFile (15.000000 seconds vs Test_JSONReadWriteFile)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.045
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 0.675425 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.1, and perfScore=0.0450284]
	                 	Test_JSONReadWriteFile is FASTER

Test Test_Optional_ (15.000000 seconds vs Test_Optional_)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.18
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 2.69229 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.179486]
	                 	Test_Optional_ is FASTER

Test UTF82WString win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.90463 secs, and comparison 7.52722 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2, and perfScore=1.2748]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

Test WString2UTF8 win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.83143 secs, and comparison 13.385 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 3.6, and perfScore=1.95933]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

[[[Tests took: 11 minutes, 14 seconds]]]

Succeeded
