Performance score 1.0 means both sides equal (ratio), and tests setup so lower is generally better

[[[Started testing at: Thu Sep 15 20:20:55 2022]]]

Using TIME MULTIPLIER: 15

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v shared_ptr copy) (mutex vs shared_ptr<> copy)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.8
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.40249 secs, and comparison 4.3408 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.803481]
	                 	shared_ptr<> copy is FASTER

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v SpinLock) (mutex vs SpinLock)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.48
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.4455 secs, and comparison 2.59 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.475622]
	                 	SpinLock is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.93
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.63135 secs, and comparison 7.12334 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.05, and perfScore=0.93343]
	                 	SharedPtr is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr (make_shared) versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.36297 secs, and comparison 7.03042 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.15, and perfScore=1.1049]
	                 	SharedPtr is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.35
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.1689 secs, and comparison 2.14919 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.48, and perfScore=0.34839]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying2 (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.44
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.32514 secs, and comparison 2.77138 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.57, and perfScore=0.438153]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple String append test (+='string object') 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	3.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.97569 secs, and comparison 18.39 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=3.07747]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.23112 secs, and comparison 18.6538 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.99366]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 100x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	24
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.45775 secs, and comparison 129.559 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 24, and perfScore=23.7386]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test String a + b (wstring vs String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.02504 secs, and comparison 9.93114 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.7, and perfScore=1.97633]
	                 	String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream << test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.94
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.51714 secs, and comparison 5.20553 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=0.943518]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test String::substr() (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 4.79224 secs, and comparison 11.9923 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.1, and perfScore=2.50245]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream versus BasicTextOutputStream (wstringstream vs MemoryStream<Characters::Character>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.61
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.23994 secs, and comparison 3.83352 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.6, and perfScore=0.614352]
	                 	MemoryStream<Characters::Character> is FASTER

Test wstringstream versus StringBuilder (wstringstream vs StringBuilder)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.097
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.56052 secs, and comparison 0.63479 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.23, and perfScore=0.096759]
	                 	StringBuilder is FASTER

Test Simple c_str() test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.6496 secs, and comparison 11.8688 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.01882]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.62
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.02677 secs, and comparison 4.97514 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.2, and perfScore=0.619819]
	                 	Sequence<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.24
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.69129 secs, and comparison 1.81493 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.33, and perfScore=0.235972]
	                 	Sequence<string> is FASTER

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	5.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.68799 secs, and comparison 38.9142 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 6, and perfScore=5.06169]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence_Array<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_Array<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.63
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.64886 secs, and comparison 4.83881 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.8, and perfScore=0.632618]
	                 	Sequence_Array<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence_stdvector<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_stdvector<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.95
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.66227 secs, and comparison 7.25826 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.4, and perfScore=0.947272]
	                 	Sequence_stdvector<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.44
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.72392 secs, and comparison 3.39369 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.439374]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection<int> basics (vector<int> vs Collection<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	4.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.16611 secs, and comparison 36.0464 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 4.4, and perfScore=4.41414]
	                 	Collection<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Collection<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.44
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.64026 secs, and comparison 3.36896 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.440949]
	                 	Collection<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_LinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_LinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.43
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.64486 secs, and comparison 3.31695 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.433879]
	                 	Collection_LinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdforward_list<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdforward_list<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.43
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.66145 secs, and comparison 3.33067 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.434731]
	                 	Collection_stdforward_list<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.61
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.71454 secs, and comparison 4.73194 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=0.61338]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics with rnd strings (vector<string> vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.99
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.20668 secs, and comparison 8.08586 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=0.985278]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string> is FASTER

Test std::set<int> vs Set<int> (set<int> vs Set<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.18
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 36.2202 secs, and comparison 6.39333 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.3, and perfScore=0.176513]
	                 	Set<int> is FASTER

Test String Characters::Format () (sprintf vs String Characters::Format)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.7
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.29371 secs, and comparison 9.21784 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=1.74128]
	                 	String Characters::Format is ***SLOWER***

Test BLOB versus vector<byte> (vector<byte> vs BLOB)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.44
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.97308 secs, and comparison 2.60032 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.55, and perfScore=0.43534]
	                 	BLOB is FASTER

Test Test_JSONReadWriteFile (15.000000 seconds vs Test_JSONReadWriteFile)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.041
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 0.613612 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.1, and perfScore=0.0409075]
	                 	Test_JSONReadWriteFile is FASTER

Test Test_Optional_ (15.000000 seconds vs Test_Optional_)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.19
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 2.89753 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.193169]
	                 	Test_Optional_ is FASTER

Test UTF82WString win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.72575 secs, and comparison 12.6315 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2, and perfScore=2.20609]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

Test WString2UTF8 win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.9
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.31044 secs, and comparison 14.2054 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 3.6, and perfScore=1.94316]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

[[[Tests took: 10 minutes, 54 seconds]]]

Succeeded
