Performance score 1.0 means both sides equal (ratio), and tests setup so lower is generally better

[[[Started testing at: Fri Sep 16 6:48:30 2022]]]

Using TIME MULTIPLIER: 15

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v shared_ptr copy) (mutex vs shared_ptr<> copy)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 49.7904 secs, and comparison 15.1105 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.303482]
	                 	shared_ptr<> copy is FASTER

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v SpinLock) (mutex vs SpinLock)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.29
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 50.2539 secs, and comparison 14.6426 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.291373]
	                 	SpinLock is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.8
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 28.295 secs, and comparison 22.6887 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.05, and perfScore=0.80186]
	                 	SharedPtr is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr (make_shared) versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.95
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 22.8678 secs, and comparison 21.8287 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.15, and perfScore=0.954558]
	                 	SharedPtr is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.17
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 19.7915 secs, and comparison 3.46106 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.48, and perfScore=0.174876]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying2 (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.19
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 20.788 secs, and comparison 4.03603 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.57, and perfScore=0.194152]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple String append test (+='string object') 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.7
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 23.0434 secs, and comparison 38.1964 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=1.65759]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.7
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 23.4272 secs, and comparison 40.4479 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=1.72654]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 100x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	10
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 20.7228 secs, and comparison 211.236 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 24, and perfScore=10.1934]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test String a + b (wstring vs String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.83
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 19.7771 secs, and comparison 16.4481 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.7, and perfScore=0.831673]
	                 	String is FASTER

Test wstringstream << test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 50.552 secs, and comparison 50.4702 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=0.998384]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test String::substr() (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 18.4606 secs, and comparison 18.9612 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.1, and perfScore=1.02712]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream versus BasicTextOutputStream (wstringstream vs MemoryStream<Characters::Character>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 42.3613 secs, and comparison 12.5663 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.6, and perfScore=0.296646]
	                 	MemoryStream<Characters::Character> is FASTER

Test wstringstream versus StringBuilder (wstringstream vs StringBuilder)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.08
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 43.8346 secs, and comparison 3.49286 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.23, and perfScore=0.0796826]
	                 	StringBuilder is FASTER

Test Simple c_str() test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 16.5164 secs, and comparison 25.0738 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.51811]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***
	                 	{{{WARNING - expected performance score less than 1.3 and got 1.51811}}}

Test Sequence<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15.1052 secs, and comparison 21.6487 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.2, and perfScore=1.43319]
	                 	Sequence<int> is ***SLOWER***
	                 	{{{WARNING - expected performance score less than 1.2 and got 1.43319}}}

Test Sequence<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.34
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.6888 secs, and comparison 4.33435 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.33, and perfScore=0.341589]
	                 	Sequence<string> is FASTER
	                 	{{{WARNING - expected performance score less than 0.33 and got 0.341589}}}

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	3.5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 14.6991 secs, and comparison 51.4126 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 6, and perfScore=3.49768]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence_Array<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_Array<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 14.7381 secs, and comparison 20.3771 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.8, and perfScore=1.38262]
	                 	Sequence_Array<int> is ***SLOWER***
	                 	{{{WARNING - expected performance score less than 0.8 and got 1.38262}}}

Test Sequence_stdvector<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_stdvector<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 14.6623 secs, and comparison 31.7918 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.4, and perfScore=2.16827]
	                 	Sequence_stdvector<int> is ***SLOWER***
	                 	{{{WARNING - expected performance score less than 1.4 and got 2.16827}}}

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.39
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.7284 secs, and comparison 4.9117 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.385886]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection<int> basics (vector<int> vs Collection<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 25.0518 secs, and comparison 58.2359 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 4.4, and perfScore=2.32462]
	                 	Collection<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Collection<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.42
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.7167 secs, and comparison 5.81812 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.424164]
	                 	Collection<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_LinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_LinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.41
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.724 secs, and comparison 5.65688 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.412189]
	                 	Collection_LinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdforward_list<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdforward_list<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.43
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.4324 secs, and comparison 5.74909 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.428002]
	                 	Collection_stdforward_list<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.98
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.3637 secs, and comparison 13.0965 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=0.980003]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics with rnd strings (vector<string> vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 20.0941 secs, and comparison 20.9734 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.04376]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string> is ***SLOWER***

Test std::set<int> vs Set<int> (set<int> vs Set<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.13
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 106.45 secs, and comparison 13.9915 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.3, and perfScore=0.131437]
	                 	Set<int> is FASTER

Test String Characters::Format () (sprintf vs String Characters::Format)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 27.3718 secs, and comparison 30.1513 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=1.10155]
	                 	String Characters::Format is ***SLOWER***

Test BLOB versus vector<byte> (vector<byte> vs BLOB)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.31
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 19.6248 secs, and comparison 6.07771 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.55, and perfScore=0.309696]
	                 	BLOB is FASTER

Test Test_JSONReadWriteFile (15.000000 seconds vs Test_JSONReadWriteFile)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.12
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 1.80617 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.1, and perfScore=0.120412]
	                 	Test_JSONReadWriteFile is FASTER
	                 	{{{WARNING - expected performance score less than 0.1 and got 0.120412}}}

Test Test_Optional_ (15.000000 seconds vs Test_Optional_)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.31
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 4.64247 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.309498]
	                 	Test_Optional_ is FASTER

Test UTF82WString win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 19.8841 secs, and comparison 25.6867 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2, and perfScore=1.29182]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

Test WString2UTF8 win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.9
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 24.027 secs, and comparison 46.1946 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 3.6, and perfScore=1.92261]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

[[[Tests took: 28 minutes, 28 seconds]]]

Succeeded
