Performance score 1.0 means both sides equal (ratio), and tests setup so lower is generally better

[[[Started testing at: Fri Sep 16 17:10:27 2022]]]

Using TIME MULTIPLIER: 15

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v shared_ptr copy) (mutex vs shared_ptr<> copy)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.13
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 52.2535 secs, and comparison 6.72289 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.128659]
	                 	shared_ptr<> copy is FASTER

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v SpinLock) (mutex vs SpinLock)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.12
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 52.3259 secs, and comparison 6.2622 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.119677]
	                 	SpinLock is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.74
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 18.8175 secs, and comparison 13.8821 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.05, and perfScore=0.737722]
	                 	SharedPtr is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr (make_shared) versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.96
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 14.096 secs, and comparison 13.5642 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.15, and perfScore=0.96227]
	                 	SharedPtr is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.18
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 20.4905 secs, and comparison 3.74256 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.48, and perfScore=0.182648]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying2 (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 21.3754 secs, and comparison 4.29429 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.57, and perfScore=0.200899]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple String append test (+='string object') 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 24.608 secs, and comparison 37.3792 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=1.51899]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.6
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 24.9645 secs, and comparison 40.0426 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=1.60398]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 100x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	10
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 20.4426 secs, and comparison 214.564 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 24, and perfScore=10.4959]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test String a + b (wstring vs String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.74
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 22.8017 secs, and comparison 16.7681 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.7, and perfScore=0.735386]
	                 	String is FASTER

Test wstringstream << test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 44.0121 secs, and comparison 44.7137 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=1.01594]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test String::substr() (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 18.9807 secs, and comparison 19.4655 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.1, and perfScore=1.02554]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream versus BasicTextOutputStream (wstringstream vs MemoryStream<Characters::Character>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.35
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 39.1093 secs, and comparison 13.8765 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.6, and perfScore=0.354814]
	                 	MemoryStream<Characters::Character> is FASTER

Test wstringstream versus StringBuilder (wstringstream vs StringBuilder)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.063
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 41.5808 secs, and comparison 2.62107 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.23, and perfScore=0.0630357]
	                 	StringBuilder is FASTER

Test Simple c_str() test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 20.8416 secs, and comparison 25.6264 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.22958]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 16.047 secs, and comparison 21.0743 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.2, and perfScore=1.31329]
	                 	Sequence<int> is ***SLOWER***
	                 	{{{WARNING - expected performance score less than 1.2 and got 1.31329}}}

Test Sequence<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.32
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.996 secs, and comparison 4.48787 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.33, and perfScore=0.320653]
	                 	Sequence<string> is FASTER

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	3.5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15.703 secs, and comparison 54.6386 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 6, and perfScore=3.4795]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence_Array<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_Array<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 14.554 secs, and comparison 20.1186 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.8, and perfScore=1.38235]
	                 	Sequence_Array<int> is ***SLOWER***
	                 	{{{WARNING - expected performance score less than 0.8 and got 1.38235}}}

Test Sequence_stdvector<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_stdvector<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.6
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15.6534 secs, and comparison 40.9016 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.4, and perfScore=2.61296]
	                 	Sequence_stdvector<int> is ***SLOWER***
	                 	{{{WARNING - expected performance score less than 1.4 and got 2.61296}}}

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.38
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.5204 secs, and comparison 5.18542 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.383524]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection<int> basics (vector<int> vs Collection<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 26.0261 secs, and comparison 66.2695 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 4.4, and perfScore=2.54627]
	                 	Collection<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Collection<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.45
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 14.0162 secs, and comparison 6.35685 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.453537]
	                 	Collection<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_LinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_LinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.45
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 14.3862 secs, and comparison 6.41788 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.446112]
	                 	Collection_LinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdforward_list<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdforward_list<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.44
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 14.8875 secs, and comparison 6.4804 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.435292]
	                 	Collection_stdforward_list<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 14.2974 secs, and comparison 15.118 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.05739]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string> is ***SLOWER***

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics with rnd strings (vector<string> vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 21.2936 secs, and comparison 23.1332 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.08639]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string> is ***SLOWER***

Test std::set<int> vs Set<int> (set<int> vs Set<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.078
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 119.18 secs, and comparison 9.3505 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.3, and perfScore=0.0784567]
	                 	Set<int> is FASTER

Test String Characters::Format () (sprintf vs String Characters::Format)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 28.2544 secs, and comparison 32.7741 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=1.15997]
	                 	String Characters::Format is ***SLOWER***

Test BLOB versus vector<byte> (vector<byte> vs BLOB)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.32
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 20.4913 secs, and comparison 6.54137 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.55, and perfScore=0.319227]
	                 	BLOB is FASTER

Test Test_JSONReadWriteFile (15.000000 seconds vs Test_JSONReadWriteFile)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.16
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 2.39071 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.1, and perfScore=0.159381]
	                 	Test_JSONReadWriteFile is FASTER
	                 	{{{WARNING - expected performance score less than 0.1 and got 0.159381}}}

Test Test_Optional_ (15.000000 seconds vs Test_Optional_)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 5.94203 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.396135]
	                 	Test_Optional_ is FASTER

Test UTF82WString win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 21.6346 secs, and comparison 25.594 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2, and perfScore=1.18301]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

Test WString2UTF8 win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.8
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 25.1995 secs, and comparison 44.9974 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 3.6, and perfScore=1.78564]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

[[[Tests took: 28 minutes, 34 seconds]]]

Succeeded
