Performance score 1.0 means both sides equal (ratio), and tests setup so lower is generally better

[[[Started testing at: Sun May 15 17:10:6 2022]]]

Using TIME MULTIPLIER: 15

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v shared_ptr copy) (mutex vs shared_ptr<> copy)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.59
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.46161 secs, and comparison 4.37959 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.586949]
	                 	shared_ptr<> copy is FASTER

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v SpinLock) (mutex vs SpinLock)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.28
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.3543 secs, and comparison 2.87075 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.277252]
	                 	SpinLock is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.89
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.69926 secs, and comparison 7.71541 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.05, and perfScore=0.886904]
	                 	SharedPtr is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr (make_shared) versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.01925 secs, and comparison 7.70401 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.15, and perfScore=1.09755]
	                 	SharedPtr is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.28
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.22272 secs, and comparison 2.33163 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.48, and perfScore=0.28356]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying2 (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.34
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.35858 secs, and comparison 2.8175 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.57, and perfScore=0.337079]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple String append test (+='string object') 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.72954 secs, and comparison 21.2801 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.43772]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.6012 secs, and comparison 21.5579 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.50639]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 100x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	18
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.16483 secs, and comparison 148.355 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 24, and perfScore=18.17]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test String a + b (wstring vs String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.5446 secs, and comparison 11.0679 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.7, and perfScore=1.46699]
	                 	String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream << test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.71893 secs, and comparison 7.79157 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=1.00941]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test String::substr() (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.8
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.08841 secs, and comparison 12.9004 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.1, and perfScore=1.81993]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream versus BasicTextOutputStream (wstringstream vs MemoryStream<Characters::Character>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.86
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.94232 secs, and comparison 7.6794 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.6, and perfScore=0.858771]
	                 	MemoryStream<Characters::Character> is FASTER

Test wstringstream versus StringBuilder (wstringstream vs StringBuilder)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.14
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.37771 secs, and comparison 1.29651 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.23, and perfScore=0.138254]
	                 	StringBuilder is FASTER

Test Simple c_str() test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.5119 secs, and comparison 13.222 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.05675]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.57
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.94379 secs, and comparison 5.62651 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.2, and perfScore=0.565831]
	                 	Sequence<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.24
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.22064 secs, and comparison 1.51755 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.33, and perfScore=0.243955]
	                 	Sequence<string> is FASTER

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	4.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.66702 secs, and comparison 40.0531 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 6, and perfScore=4.14328]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence_Array<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_Array<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.54
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.6476 secs, and comparison 5.22194 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.8, and perfScore=0.541268]
	                 	Sequence_Array<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence_stdvector<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_stdvector<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.55689 secs, and comparison 9.51456 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.4, and perfScore=0.995571]
	                 	Sequence_stdvector<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.57
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.16272 secs, and comparison 3.51502 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.570368]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection<int> basics (vector<int> vs Collection<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	3.8
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.9725 secs, and comparison 37.5522 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 4.4, and perfScore=3.76558]
	                 	Collection<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Collection<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.54
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.50362 secs, and comparison 3.50553 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.539011]
	                 	Collection<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_LinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_LinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.54
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.47383 secs, and comparison 3.51167 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.542441]
	                 	Collection_LinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdforward_list<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdforward_list<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.54
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.46483 secs, and comparison 3.46503 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.535982]
	                 	Collection_stdforward_list<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.74
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.459 secs, and comparison 4.80526 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=0.743963]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics with rnd strings (vector<string> vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.8453 secs, and comparison 8.77839 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.2824]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string> is ***SLOWER***

Test std::set<int> vs Set<int> (set<int> vs Set<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.13
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 47.1779 secs, and comparison 5.9246 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.3, and perfScore=0.12558]
	                 	Set<int> is FASTER

Test String Characters::Format () (sprintf vs String Characters::Format)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.47984 secs, and comparison 12.3816 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=1.46012]
	                 	String Characters::Format is ***SLOWER***

Test BLOB versus vector<byte> (vector<byte> vs BLOB)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.41
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.34752 secs, and comparison 2.99583 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.55, and perfScore=0.407733]
	                 	BLOB is FASTER

Test Test_JSONReadWriteFile (15.000000 seconds vs Test_JSONReadWriteFile)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.052
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 0.778542 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.1, and perfScore=0.0519028]
	                 	Test_JSONReadWriteFile is FASTER

Test Test_Optional_ (15.000000 seconds vs Test_Optional_)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.21
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 3.07527 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.205018]
	                 	Test_Optional_ is FASTER

Test UTF82WString win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.6
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.37589 secs, and comparison 13.5559 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2, and perfScore=1.61845]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

Test WString2UTF8 win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	3.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.21068 secs, and comparison 28.7892 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 3.6, and perfScore=3.12563]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

[[[Tests took: 12 minutes, 52 seconds]]]

Succeeded
