Performance score 1.0 means both sides equal (ratio), and tests setup so lower is generally better

[[[Started testing at: Thu May 12 10:34:16 2022]]]

Using TIME MULTIPLIER: 15

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v shared_ptr copy) (mutex vs shared_ptr<> copy)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.79
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.52876 secs, and comparison 4.38024 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.792264]
	                 	shared_ptr<> copy is FASTER

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v SpinLock) (mutex vs SpinLock)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.48
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.62103 secs, and comparison 2.69581 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.479593]
	                 	SpinLock is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.9
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.06179 secs, and comparison 7.27482 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.05, and perfScore=0.902384]
	                 	SharedPtr is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr (make_shared) versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.65338 secs, and comparison 7.31284 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.15, and perfScore=1.09912]
	                 	SharedPtr is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.35
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.48258 secs, and comparison 2.25654 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.48, and perfScore=0.348093]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying2 (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.43
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.54937 secs, and comparison 2.81108 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.57, and perfScore=0.429213]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple String append test (+='string object') 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	3.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.15017 secs, and comparison 18.9949 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=3.08851]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.9
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.54868 secs, and comparison 19.2706 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.94267]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 100x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	25
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.43079 secs, and comparison 158.73 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 24, and perfScore=24.6828]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test String a + b (wstring vs String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.9
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.46308 secs, and comparison 10.3532 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.7, and perfScore=1.89512]
	                 	String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream << test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.72681 secs, and comparison 5.76814 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=1.00722]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test String::substr() (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.15158 secs, and comparison 12.2896 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.1, and perfScore=2.3856]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream versus BasicTextOutputStream (wstringstream vs MemoryStream<Characters::Character>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.6
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.64374 secs, and comparison 3.96021 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.6, and perfScore=0.596082]
	                 	MemoryStream<Characters::Character> is FASTER

Test wstringstream versus StringBuilder (wstringstream vs StringBuilder)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.099
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.0706 secs, and comparison 0.698239 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.23, and perfScore=0.0987525]
	                 	StringBuilder is FASTER

Test Simple c_str() test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.7158 secs, and comparison 12.2002 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.04134]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.66
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.35244 secs, and comparison 5.51739 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.2, and perfScore=0.660573]
	                 	Sequence<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.22
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.88127 secs, and comparison 1.76996 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.33, and perfScore=0.224578]
	                 	Sequence<string> is FASTER

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	4.9
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.0486 secs, and comparison 39.241 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 6, and perfScore=4.87551]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence_Array<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_Array<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.46
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.4948 secs, and comparison 5.32858 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.8, and perfScore=0.463564]
	                 	Sequence_Array<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence_stdvector<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_stdvector<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.67
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.5658 secs, and comparison 7.69357 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.4, and perfScore=0.665202]
	                 	Sequence_stdvector<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.46
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.74139 secs, and comparison 3.52586 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.455455]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection<int> basics (vector<int> vs Collection<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	3.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.6664 secs, and comparison 36.4285 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 4.4, and perfScore=3.12251]
	                 	Collection<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Collection<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.44
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.67907 secs, and comparison 3.38383 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.440656]
	                 	Collection<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_LinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_LinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.44
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.87022 secs, and comparison 3.43511 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.43647]
	                 	Collection_LinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdforward_list<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdforward_list<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.47
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.6442 secs, and comparison 3.60482 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.471576]
	                 	Collection_stdforward_list<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.69
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.85122 secs, and comparison 5.39823 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=0.687566]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics with rnd strings (vector<string> vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.475 secs, and comparison 8.82358 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.04113]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string> is ***SLOWER***

Test std::set<int> vs Set<int> (set<int> vs Set<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.14
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 37.8463 secs, and comparison 5.43125 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.3, and perfScore=0.143508]
	                 	Set<int> is FASTER

Test String Characters::Format () (sprintf vs String Characters::Format)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.6
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.06434 secs, and comparison 9.79736 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=1.61557]
	                 	String Characters::Format is ***SLOWER***

Test BLOB versus vector<byte> (vector<byte> vs BLOB)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.49
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.90075 secs, and comparison 2.87715 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.55, and perfScore=0.487591]
	                 	BLOB is FASTER

Test Test_JSONReadWriteFile (15.000000 seconds vs Test_JSONReadWriteFile)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.047
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 0.701812 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.1, and perfScore=0.0467875]
	                 	Test_JSONReadWriteFile is FASTER

Test Test_Optional_ (15.000000 seconds vs Test_Optional_)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 3.05039 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.203359]
	                 	Test_Optional_ is FASTER

Test UTF82WString win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.9
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.78821 secs, and comparison 12.8695 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2, and perfScore=1.89586]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

Test WString2UTF8 win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.7
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.34472 secs, and comparison 14.4421 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 3.6, and perfScore=1.73069]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

[[[Tests took: 11 minutes, 56 seconds]]]

Succeeded
