Performance score 1.0 means both sides equal (ratio), and tests setup so lower is generally better

[[[Started testing at: Fri Aug 12 1:18:20 2022]]]

Using TIME MULTIPLIER: 15

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v shared_ptr copy) (mutex vs shared_ptr<> copy)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.61
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.72942 secs, and comparison 4.11268 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.61115]
	                 	shared_ptr<> copy is FASTER

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v SpinLock) (mutex vs SpinLock)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.39
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.68821 secs, and comparison 2.57949 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.385677]
	                 	SpinLock is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.84
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.38636 secs, and comparison 7.02971 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.05, and perfScore=0.838231]
	                 	SharedPtr is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr (make_shared) versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.44393 secs, and comparison 7.03196 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.15, and perfScore=1.09125]
	                 	SharedPtr is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.27
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.8763 secs, and comparison 2.12159 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.48, and perfScore=0.269363]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying2 (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.34
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.6289 secs, and comparison 2.61619 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.57, and perfScore=0.342931]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple String append test (+='string object') 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.00232 secs, and comparison 19.7503 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.46808]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.21662 secs, and comparison 20.3936 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.48199]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 100x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	18
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.57121 secs, and comparison 135.97 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 24, and perfScore=17.9589]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test String a + b (wstring vs String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.14743 secs, and comparison 10.2958 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.7, and perfScore=1.44049]
	                 	String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream << test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.52002 secs, and comparison 7.48263 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=0.995029]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test String::substr() (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.8
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.89119 secs, and comparison 12.2517 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.1, and perfScore=1.77788]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream versus BasicTextOutputStream (wstringstream vs MemoryStream<Characters::Character>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.76
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.39545 secs, and comparison 6.35161 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.6, and perfScore=0.756554]
	                 	MemoryStream<Characters::Character> is FASTER

Test wstringstream versus StringBuilder (wstringstream vs StringBuilder)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.14
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.88793 secs, and comparison 1.27757 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.23, and perfScore=0.143743]
	                 	StringBuilder is FASTER

Test Simple c_str() test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.3106 secs, and comparison 12.848 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.04365]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.56
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.64262 secs, and comparison 5.36512 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.2, and perfScore=0.556396]
	                 	Sequence<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.25
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.87816 secs, and comparison 1.44909 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.33, and perfScore=0.246521]
	                 	Sequence<string> is FASTER

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	4.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.27482 secs, and comparison 37.7643 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 6, and perfScore=4.0717]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence_Array<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_Array<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.55
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.26813 secs, and comparison 5.11714 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.8, and perfScore=0.552122]
	                 	Sequence_Array<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence_stdvector<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_stdvector<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.96
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.27369 secs, and comparison 8.94577 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.4, and perfScore=0.96464]
	                 	Sequence_stdvector<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.56
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.92542 secs, and comparison 3.30106 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.557101]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection<int> basics (vector<int> vs Collection<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	3.7
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.51407 secs, and comparison 35.211 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 4.4, and perfScore=3.70093]
	                 	Collection<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Collection<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.54
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.07027 secs, and comparison 3.29432 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.542697]
	                 	Collection<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_LinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_LinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.55
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.03883 secs, and comparison 3.31479 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.548913]
	                 	Collection_LinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdforward_list<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdforward_list<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.54
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.0337 secs, and comparison 3.24519 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.537844]
	                 	Collection_stdforward_list<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.78
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.03024 secs, and comparison 4.69375 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=0.778369]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics with rnd strings (vector<string> vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.55625 secs, and comparison 8.39153 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.27993]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string> is ***SLOWER***

Test std::set<int> vs Set<int> (set<int> vs Set<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.14
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 44.2238 secs, and comparison 6.02485 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.3, and perfScore=0.136235]
	                 	Set<int> is FASTER

Test String Characters::Format () (sprintf vs String Characters::Format)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.15966 secs, and comparison 11.8011 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=1.44627]
	                 	String Characters::Format is ***SLOWER***

Test BLOB versus vector<byte> (vector<byte> vs BLOB)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.39
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.86345 secs, and comparison 2.68647 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.55, and perfScore=0.391417]
	                 	BLOB is FASTER

Test Test_JSONReadWriteFile (15.000000 seconds vs Test_JSONReadWriteFile)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.05
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 0.745697 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.1, and perfScore=0.0497131]
	                 	Test_JSONReadWriteFile is FASTER

Test Test_Optional_ (15.000000 seconds vs Test_Optional_)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 3.03015 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.20201]
	                 	Test_Optional_ is FASTER

Test UTF82WString win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.7
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.69011 secs, and comparison 12.9381 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2, and perfScore=1.68243]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

Test WString2UTF8 win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	3.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.35592 secs, and comparison 28.2528 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 3.6, and perfScore=3.38118]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

[[[Tests took: 12 minutes, 2 seconds]]]

Succeeded
