Performance score 1.0 means both sides equal (ratio), and tests setup so lower is generally better

[[[Started testing at: Tue Mar 29 20:26:17 2022]]]

Using TIME MULTIPLIER: 15

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v shared_ptr copy) (mutex vs shared_ptr<> copy)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.57
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.3052 secs, and comparison 6.49278 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.57432]
	                 	shared_ptr<> copy is FASTER

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v SpinLock) (mutex vs SpinLock)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.35
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.3309 secs, and comparison 3.95551 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.349092]
	                 	SpinLock is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.88
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.6006 secs, and comparison 11.1185 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.05, and perfScore=0.882383]
	                 	SharedPtr is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr (make_shared) versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.76496 secs, and comparison 10.4997 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.15, and perfScore=1.07524]
	                 	SharedPtr is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.29
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.1424 secs, and comparison 3.57649 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.48, and perfScore=0.294545]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying2 (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.35
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.6242 secs, and comparison 4.09638 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.57, and perfScore=0.352401]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple String append test (+='string object') 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.9555 secs, and comparison 32.1619 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.3046]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 14.114 secs, and comparison 33.2756 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.35763]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 100x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	12
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 14.4079 secs, and comparison 176.024 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 24, and perfScore=12.2172]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test String a + b (wstring vs String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.653 secs, and comparison 16.2823 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.7, and perfScore=1.28683]
	                 	String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream << test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.9824 secs, and comparison 14.5698 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=1.04201]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test String::substr() (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.7
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.9852 secs, and comparison 18.745 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.1, and perfScore=1.70639]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream versus BasicTextOutputStream (wstringstream vs MemoryStream<Characters::Character>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.72
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15.268 secs, and comparison 10.9974 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.6, and perfScore=0.720288]
	                 	MemoryStream<Characters::Character> is FASTER

Test wstringstream versus StringBuilder (wstringstream vs StringBuilder)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.13
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15.8698 secs, and comparison 2.09934 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.23, and perfScore=0.132285]
	                 	StringBuilder is FASTER

Test Simple c_str() test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.89
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 17.2012 secs, and comparison 15.275 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=0.888018]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Sequence<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.67
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.4435 secs, and comparison 8.30867 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.2, and perfScore=0.667714]
	                 	Sequence<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.27
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.0626 secs, and comparison 3.0051 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.33, and perfScore=0.271645]
	                 	Sequence<string> is FASTER

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	4.5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.2191 secs, and comparison 50.9028 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 6, and perfScore=4.53716]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence_Array<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_Array<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.71
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.9124 secs, and comparison 8.50043 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.8, and perfScore=0.713579]
	                 	Sequence_Array<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence_stdvector<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_stdvector<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.5229 secs, and comparison 16.8228 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.4, and perfScore=1.45994]
	                 	Sequence_stdvector<int> is ***SLOWER***
	                 	{{{WARNING - expected performance score less than 1.4 and got 1.45994}}}

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.39
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.7713 secs, and comparison 4.62498 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.392902]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection<int> basics (vector<int> vs Collection<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	3.9
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.438 secs, and comparison 48.3777 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 4.4, and perfScore=3.88952]
	                 	Collection<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Collection<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.37
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.4669 secs, and comparison 4.65414 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.37332]
	                 	Collection<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_LinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_LinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.43
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.4761 secs, and comparison 5.41049 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.433668]
	                 	Collection_LinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdforward_list<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdforward_list<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.39
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.8129 secs, and comparison 5.04926 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.394077]
	                 	Collection_stdforward_list<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.75
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.3054 secs, and comparison 9.98413 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=0.750379]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics with rnd strings (vector<string> vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.854 secs, and comparison 14.6112 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.05465]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string> is ***SLOWER***

Test std::set<int> vs Set<int> (set<int> vs Set<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.18
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 77.4612 secs, and comparison 14.1528 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.3, and perfScore=0.182708]
	                 	Set<int> is FASTER

Test String Characters::Format () (sprintf vs String Characters::Format)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15.8813 secs, and comparison 22.2993 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=1.40412]
	                 	String Characters::Format is ***SLOWER***

Test BLOB versus vector<byte> (vector<byte> vs BLOB)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.35
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 17.5867 secs, and comparison 6.2084 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.55, and perfScore=0.353017]
	                 	BLOB is FASTER

Test Test_JSONReadWriteFile (15.000000 seconds vs Test_JSONReadWriteFile)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.097
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 1.45513 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.1, and perfScore=0.0970087]
	                 	Test_JSONReadWriteFile is FASTER

Test Test_Optional_ (15.000000 seconds vs Test_Optional_)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.31
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 4.65241 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.31016]
	                 	Test_Optional_ is FASTER

Test UTF82WString win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 14.3959 secs, and comparison 20.5978 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2, and perfScore=1.43081]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

Test WString2UTF8 win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 16.7959 secs, and comparison 41.9273 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 3.6, and perfScore=2.49629]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

[[[Tests took: 19 minutes, 2 seconds]]]

Succeeded
