Performance score 1.0 means both sides equal (ratio), and tests setup so lower is generally better

[[[Started testing at: Sat Jul 23 12:2:22 2022]]]

Using TIME MULTIPLIER: 15

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v shared_ptr copy) (mutex vs shared_ptr<> copy)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.49
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.5383 secs, and comparison 6.11538 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.487735]
	                 	shared_ptr<> copy is FASTER

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v SpinLock) (mutex vs SpinLock)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.36
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.781 secs, and comparison 4.29378 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.364466]
	                 	SpinLock is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.86
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.328 secs, and comparison 11.4108 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.05, and perfScore=0.856153]
	                 	SharedPtr is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr (make_shared) versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.4066 secs, and comparison 10.9297 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.15, and perfScore=1.05026]
	                 	SharedPtr is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.26
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.7759 secs, and comparison 3.35587 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.48, and perfScore=0.262672]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying2 (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.31
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.0027 secs, and comparison 4.02574 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.57, and perfScore=0.309609]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple String append test (+='string object') 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 14.9113 secs, and comparison 34.9481 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.34373]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15.4346 secs, and comparison 36.5998 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.37128]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 100x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	12
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15.1818 secs, and comparison 178.595 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 24, and perfScore=11.7638]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test String a + b (wstring vs String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.0883 secs, and comparison 16.6968 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.7, and perfScore=1.50581]
	                 	String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream << test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 14.1109 secs, and comparison 14.2507 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=1.00991]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test String::substr() (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.7
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.5458 secs, and comparison 19.89 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.1, and perfScore=1.72269]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream versus BasicTextOutputStream (wstringstream vs MemoryStream<Characters::Character>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.76
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15.0929 secs, and comparison 11.5344 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.6, and perfScore=0.764229]
	                 	MemoryStream<Characters::Character> is FASTER

Test wstringstream versus StringBuilder (wstringstream vs StringBuilder)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.16
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15.6792 secs, and comparison 2.49076 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.23, and perfScore=0.158857]
	                 	StringBuilder is FASTER

Test Simple c_str() test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15.531 secs, and comparison 16.8365 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.08405]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.76
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.4968 secs, and comparison 9.45371 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.2, and perfScore=0.756489]
	                 	Sequence<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.26
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.4199 secs, and comparison 2.99648 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.33, and perfScore=0.262391]
	                 	Sequence<string> is FASTER

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	4.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.9373 secs, and comparison 51.2904 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 6, and perfScore=4.29666]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence_Array<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_Array<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.71
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.3155 secs, and comparison 8.05435 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.8, and perfScore=0.711795]
	                 	Sequence_Array<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence_stdvector<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_stdvector<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.8928 secs, and comparison 16.2313 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.4, and perfScore=1.36479]
	                 	Sequence_stdvector<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.42
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.2634 secs, and comparison 4.76988 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.423487]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection<int> basics (vector<int> vs Collection<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	3.7
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.073 secs, and comparison 48.7028 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 4.4, and perfScore=3.72546]
	                 	Collection<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Collection<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.42
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.5307 secs, and comparison 4.80255 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.416503]
	                 	Collection<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_LinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_LinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.173 secs, and comparison 4.81755 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.395755]
	                 	Collection_LinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdforward_list<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdforward_list<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.35
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.1786 secs, and comparison 4.27457 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.35099]
	                 	Collection_stdforward_list<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.77
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.68 secs, and comparison 8.98428 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=0.769204]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics with rnd strings (vector<string> vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.93
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 14.1485 secs, and comparison 13.1801 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=0.931555]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string> is FASTER

Test std::set<int> vs Set<int> (set<int> vs Set<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.17
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 76.1139 secs, and comparison 12.8265 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.3, and perfScore=0.168517]
	                 	Set<int> is FASTER

Test String Characters::Format () (sprintf vs String Characters::Format)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 16.1287 secs, and comparison 21.4821 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=1.33192]
	                 	String Characters::Format is ***SLOWER***

Test BLOB versus vector<byte> (vector<byte> vs BLOB)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 16.9303 secs, and comparison 5.02771 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.55, and perfScore=0.296965]
	                 	BLOB is FASTER

Test Test_JSONReadWriteFile (15.000000 seconds vs Test_JSONReadWriteFile)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.07
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 1.05419 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.1, and perfScore=0.0702794]
	                 	Test_JSONReadWriteFile is FASTER

Test Test_Optional_ (15.000000 seconds vs Test_Optional_)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 4.5706 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.304707]
	                 	Test_Optional_ is FASTER

Test UTF82WString win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.8
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 14.0743 secs, and comparison 25.4591 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2, and perfScore=1.80891]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

Test WString2UTF8 win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.8
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.8728 secs, and comparison 39.1924 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 3.6, and perfScore=2.82512]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

[[[Tests took: 19 minutes, 5 seconds]]]

Succeeded
