Performance score 1.0 means both sides equal (ratio), and tests setup so lower is generally better

[[[Started testing at: Tue Apr 26 16:38:2 2022]]]

Using TIME MULTIPLIER: 15

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v shared_ptr copy) (mutex vs shared_ptr<> copy)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.46
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.7768 secs, and comparison 4.94316 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.458687]
	                 	shared_ptr<> copy is FASTER

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v SpinLock) (mutex vs SpinLock)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.28
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.4106 secs, and comparison 2.8782 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.276467]
	                 	SpinLock is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.86
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.3079 secs, and comparison 8.82393 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.05, and perfScore=0.856036]
	                 	SharedPtr is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr (make_shared) versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.91525 secs, and comparison 8.8941 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.15, and perfScore=1.12367]
	                 	SharedPtr is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.29
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.2847 secs, and comparison 2.97601 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.48, and perfScore=0.289362]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying2 (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.34
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.4514 secs, and comparison 3.53122 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.57, and perfScore=0.33787]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple String append test (+='string object') 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.8993 secs, and comparison 26.0785 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.1916]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.2555 secs, and comparison 27.4519 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.23996]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 100x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	13
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.352 secs, and comparison 149.842 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 24, and perfScore=13.1996]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test String a + b (wstring vs String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.4606 secs, and comparison 13.7529 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.7, and perfScore=1.20001]
	                 	String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream << test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.99
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.1873 secs, and comparison 12.0512 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=0.988839]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test String::substr() (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.8
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.83611 secs, and comparison 16.1537 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.1, and perfScore=1.82815]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream versus BasicTextOutputStream (wstringstream vs MemoryStream<Characters::Character>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.79
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.7506 secs, and comparison 10.0567 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.6, and perfScore=0.788723]
	                 	MemoryStream<Characters::Character> is FASTER

Test wstringstream versus StringBuilder (wstringstream vs StringBuilder)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.11
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.6565 secs, and comparison 1.47478 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.23, and perfScore=0.107991]
	                 	StringBuilder is FASTER

Test Simple c_str() test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.93
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 14.1785 secs, and comparison 13.2498 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=0.934502]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Sequence<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.71
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.0348 secs, and comparison 7.13852 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.2, and perfScore=0.711375]
	                 	Sequence<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.25
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.25716 secs, and comparison 2.33672 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.33, and perfScore=0.252423]
	                 	Sequence<string> is FASTER

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	4.6
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.61725 secs, and comparison 43.916 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 6, and perfScore=4.56638]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence_Array<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_Array<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.69
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.61304 secs, and comparison 6.59501 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.8, and perfScore=0.686048]
	                 	Sequence_Array<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence_stdvector<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_stdvector<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.58024 secs, and comparison 14.6049 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.4, and perfScore=1.52448]
	                 	Sequence_stdvector<int> is ***SLOWER***
	                 	{{{WARNING - expected performance score less than 1.4 and got 1.52448}}}

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.43
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.2766 secs, and comparison 3.94506 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.42527]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection<int> basics (vector<int> vs Collection<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	3.8
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.5911 secs, and comparison 40.7521 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 4.4, and perfScore=3.84777]
	                 	Collection<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Collection<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.43
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.23633 secs, and comparison 4.00319 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.433418]
	                 	Collection<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_LinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_LinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.43
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.2109 secs, and comparison 3.99743 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.433989]
	                 	Collection_LinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdforward_list<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdforward_list<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.45
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.24743 secs, and comparison 4.15024 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.448799]
	                 	Collection_stdforward_list<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.89
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.24213 secs, and comparison 8.19647 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=0.886859]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics with rnd strings (vector<string> vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.6945 secs, and comparison 12.0406 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.12586]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string> is ***SLOWER***

Test std::set<int> vs Set<int> (set<int> vs Set<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.11
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 62.6441 secs, and comparison 7.05226 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.3, and perfScore=0.112577]
	                 	Set<int> is FASTER

Test String Characters::Format () (sprintf vs String Characters::Format)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.3924 secs, and comparison 17.8613 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=1.44131]
	                 	String Characters::Format is ***SLOWER***

Test BLOB versus vector<byte> (vector<byte> vs BLOB)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.31
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 14.3968 secs, and comparison 4.48947 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.55, and perfScore=0.311839]
	                 	BLOB is FASTER

Test Test_JSONReadWriteFile (15.000000 seconds vs Test_JSONReadWriteFile)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.081
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 1.21858 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.1, and perfScore=0.0812388]
	                 	Test_JSONReadWriteFile is FASTER

Test Test_Optional_ (15.000000 seconds vs Test_Optional_)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.29
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 4.3937 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.292913]
	                 	Test_Optional_ is FASTER

Test UTF82WString win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.7
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.8753 secs, and comparison 19.7493 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2, and perfScore=1.66306]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

Test WString2UTF8 win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.6879 secs, and comparison 32.0865 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 3.6, and perfScore=2.5289]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

[[[Tests took: 15 minutes, 44 seconds]]]

Succeeded
