Performance score 1.0 means both sides equal (ratio), and tests setup so lower is generally better

[[[Started testing at: Mon Apr  4 6:40:53 2022]]]

Using TIME MULTIPLIER: 15

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v shared_ptr copy) (mutex vs shared_ptr<> copy)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.59
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.05742 secs, and comparison 4.71769 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.585508]
	                 	shared_ptr<> copy is FASTER

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v SpinLock) (mutex vs SpinLock)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.36
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.42554 secs, and comparison 3.05987 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.363166]
	                 	SpinLock is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.82
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.5003 secs, and comparison 8.60949 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.05, and perfScore=0.819928]
	                 	SharedPtr is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr (make_shared) versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.89847 secs, and comparison 8.484 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.15, and perfScore=1.07413]
	                 	SharedPtr is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.27
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.49357 secs, and comparison 2.53232 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.48, and perfScore=0.266741]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying2 (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.33
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.3289 secs, and comparison 3.0381 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.57, and perfScore=0.325665]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple String append test (+='string object') 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.238 secs, and comparison 23.5329 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.29857]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.1705 secs, and comparison 24.6143 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.42015]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 100x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	18
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.30423 secs, and comparison 167.214 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 24, and perfScore=17.9719]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test String a + b (wstring vs String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.92367 secs, and comparison 11.7701 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.7, and perfScore=1.31897]
	                 	String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream << test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.97
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.2545 secs, and comparison 9.99332 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=0.974529]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test String::substr() (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.6
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.70525 secs, and comparison 14.0138 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.1, and perfScore=1.60981]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream versus BasicTextOutputStream (wstringstream vs MemoryStream<Characters::Character>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.65
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.8628 secs, and comparison 7.74495 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.6, and perfScore=0.652875]
	                 	MemoryStream<Characters::Character> is FASTER

Test wstringstream versus StringBuilder (wstringstream vs StringBuilder)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.13
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.5692 secs, and comparison 1.61004 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.23, and perfScore=0.128094]
	                 	StringBuilder is FASTER

Test Simple c_str() test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 14.0012 secs, and comparison 14.7238 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.05161]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.6
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.4316 secs, and comparison 6.83801 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.2, and perfScore=0.598165]
	                 	Sequence<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.24
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.47922 secs, and comparison 1.82093 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.33, and perfScore=0.243465]
	                 	Sequence<string> is FASTER

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	3.9
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.217 secs, and comparison 43.3496 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 6, and perfScore=3.86463]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence_Array<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_Array<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.59
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.0252 secs, and comparison 6.45408 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.8, and perfScore=0.585393]
	                 	Sequence_Array<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence_stdvector<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_stdvector<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.8918 secs, and comparison 11.2327 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.4, and perfScore=1.03129]
	                 	Sequence_stdvector<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.58715 secs, and comparison 3.82139 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.503666]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection<int> basics (vector<int> vs Collection<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	3.6
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.1554 secs, and comparison 40.289 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 4.4, and perfScore=3.61161]
	                 	Collection<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Collection<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.51
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.54922 secs, and comparison 3.81401 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.505219]
	                 	Collection<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_LinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_LinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.51
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.40328 secs, and comparison 3.75481 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.507183]
	                 	Collection_LinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdforward_list<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdforward_list<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.66808 secs, and comparison 3.7971 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.495183]
	                 	Collection_stdforward_list<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.74
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.545 secs, and comparison 5.57151 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=0.738438]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics with rnd strings (vector<string> vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.06675 secs, and comparison 9.6459 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.19576]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string> is ***SLOWER***

Test std::set<int> vs Set<int> (set<int> vs Set<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.13
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 54.4162 secs, and comparison 6.88534 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.3, and perfScore=0.126531]
	                 	Set<int> is FASTER

Test String Characters::Format () (sprintf vs String Characters::Format)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.4689 secs, and comparison 14.3824 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=1.37383]
	                 	String Characters::Format is ***SLOWER***

Test BLOB versus vector<byte> (vector<byte> vs BLOB)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.39
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.5444 secs, and comparison 3.30935 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.55, and perfScore=0.387312]
	                 	BLOB is FASTER

Test Test_JSONReadWriteFile (15.000000 seconds vs Test_JSONReadWriteFile)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.06
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 0.901175 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.1, and perfScore=0.0600783]
	                 	Test_JSONReadWriteFile is FASTER

Test Test_Optional_ (15.000000 seconds vs Test_Optional_)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.22
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 3.28915 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.219277]
	                 	Test_Optional_ is FASTER

Test UTF82WString win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.8478 secs, and comparison 10.221 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2, and perfScore=1.0379]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

Test WString2UTF8 win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.8
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.7769 secs, and comparison 33.2382 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 3.6, and perfScore=2.82233]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

[[[Tests took: 14 minutes, 31 seconds]]]

Succeeded
