Performance score 1.0 means both sides equal (ratio), and tests setup so lower is generally better

[[[Started testing at: Wed May 11 16:8:12 2022]]]

Using TIME MULTIPLIER: 15

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v shared_ptr copy) (mutex vs shared_ptr<> copy)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.78
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.68027 secs, and comparison 4.42818 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.779572]
	                 	shared_ptr<> copy is FASTER

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v SpinLock) (mutex vs SpinLock)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.47
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.81045 secs, and comparison 2.72924 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.469713]
	                 	SpinLock is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.9
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.0252 secs, and comparison 7.24691 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.05, and perfScore=0.90302]
	                 	SharedPtr is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr (make_shared) versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.58613 secs, and comparison 7.36456 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.15, and perfScore=1.11819]
	                 	SharedPtr is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.067
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 33.0419 secs, and comparison 2.22023 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.48, and perfScore=0.0671945]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying2 (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.09
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 31.0583 secs, and comparison 2.80934 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.57, and perfScore=0.0904537]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple String append test (+='string object') 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.19605 secs, and comparison 18.517 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.98851]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.8
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.82422 secs, and comparison 19.0056 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.78502]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 100x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	21
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.27134 secs, and comparison 132.111 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 24, and perfScore=21.0659]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test String a + b (wstring vs String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.7
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.61857 secs, and comparison 9.44285 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.7, and perfScore=1.68065]
	                 	String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream << test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.95
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.62867 secs, and comparison 5.32137 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=0.945404]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test String::substr() (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.19682 secs, and comparison 11.6707 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.1, and perfScore=2.24573]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream versus BasicTextOutputStream (wstringstream vs MemoryStream<Characters::Character>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.73
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.98264 secs, and comparison 5.12874 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.6, and perfScore=0.734498]
	                 	MemoryStream<Characters::Character> is FASTER

Test wstringstream versus StringBuilder (wstringstream vs StringBuilder)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.096
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.58756 secs, and comparison 0.728888 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.23, and perfScore=0.0960636]
	                 	StringBuilder is FASTER

Test Simple c_str() test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.9499 secs, and comparison 12.122 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.0144]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.62
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.36138 secs, and comparison 5.20254 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.2, and perfScore=0.622211]
	                 	Sequence<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.22
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.59125 secs, and comparison 1.70396 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.33, and perfScore=0.224464]
	                 	Sequence<string> is FASTER

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	4.8
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.84917 secs, and comparison 37.3452 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 6, and perfScore=4.75785]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence_Array<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_Array<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.61
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.01204 secs, and comparison 4.87875 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.8, and perfScore=0.608927]
	                 	Sequence_Array<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence_stdvector<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_stdvector<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.94
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.91116 secs, and comparison 7.40458 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.4, and perfScore=0.935966]
	                 	Sequence_stdvector<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.44
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.48441 secs, and comparison 3.3142 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.442814]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection<int> basics (vector<int> vs Collection<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	4.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.32036 secs, and comparison 35.0323 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 4.4, and perfScore=4.21043]
	                 	Collection<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Collection<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.42
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.57632 secs, and comparison 3.18024 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.41976]
	                 	Collection<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_LinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_LinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.43
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.48369 secs, and comparison 3.22357 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.430747]
	                 	Collection_LinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdforward_list<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdforward_list<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.44
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.37216 secs, and comparison 3.24887 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.440694]
	                 	Collection_stdforward_list<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.67
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.41204 secs, and comparison 4.95391 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=0.668361]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics with rnd strings (vector<string> vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.93757 secs, and comparison 8.0541 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.01468]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string> is ***SLOWER***

Test std::set<int> vs Set<int> (set<int> vs Set<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.13
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 36.8203 secs, and comparison 4.87269 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.3, and perfScore=0.132337]
	                 	Set<int> is FASTER

Test String Characters::Format () (sprintf vs String Characters::Format)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.6
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.68739 secs, and comparison 9.29717 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=1.6347]
	                 	String Characters::Format is ***SLOWER***

Test BLOB versus vector<byte> (vector<byte> vs BLOB)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.45
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.91443 secs, and comparison 2.64186 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.55, and perfScore=0.446681]
	                 	BLOB is FASTER

Test Test_JSONReadWriteFile (15.000000 seconds vs Test_JSONReadWriteFile)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.037
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 0.561797 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.1, and perfScore=0.0374531]
	                 	Test_JSONReadWriteFile is FASTER

Test Test_Optional_ (15.000000 seconds vs Test_Optional_)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.18
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 2.76678 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.184452]
	                 	Test_Optional_ is FASTER

Test UTF82WString win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.9
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.75701 secs, and comparison 12.5053 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2, and perfScore=1.85071]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

Test WString2UTF8 win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.99776 secs, and comparison 13.7043 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 3.6, and perfScore=1.95839]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

[[[Tests took: 11 minutes, 55 seconds]]]

Succeeded
