Performance score 1.0 means both sides equal (ratio), and tests setup so lower is generally better

[[[Started testing at: Tue Sep  5 11:49:46 2023]]]

Using TIME MULTIPLIER: 15

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v shared_ptr copy) (mutex vs shared_ptr<> copy)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.84
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 4.8308 secs, and comparison 4.05801 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.84003]
	                 	shared_ptr<> copy is FASTER

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v SpinLock) (mutex vs SpinLock)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.43
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.06585 secs, and comparison 2.18548 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.431413]
	                 	SpinLock is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.94
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.28924 secs, and comparison 6.88705 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.05, and perfScore=0.944825]
	                 	SharedPtr is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr (make_shared) versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.04525 secs, and comparison 6.90962 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.15, and perfScore=1.14298]
	                 	SharedPtr is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.063
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 31.5399 secs, and comparison 1.98018 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.48, and perfScore=0.0627834]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying2 (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.084
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 29.951 secs, and comparison 2.50296 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.57, and perfScore=0.0835684]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple String append test (+='string object') 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.7
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.39475 secs, and comparison 17.397 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.72051]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.05627 secs, and comparison 17.2016 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.43777]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 100x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	23
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.76845 secs, and comparison 133.268 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 24, and perfScore=23.103]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test String a + b (wstring vs String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.7
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.3522 secs, and comparison 9.04881 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.7, and perfScore=1.69067]
	                 	String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream << test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.95
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.74624 secs, and comparison 5.43916 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=0.94656]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test String::substr() (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 4.81154 secs, and comparison 10.9781 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.1, and perfScore=2.28162]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream versus BasicTextOutputStream (wstringstream vs MemoryStream<Characters::Character>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.68
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.54188 secs, and comparison 4.47136 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.6, and perfScore=0.683499]
	                 	MemoryStream<Characters::Character> is FASTER

Test wstringstream versus StringBuilder (wstringstream vs StringBuilder)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.095
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.83734 secs, and comparison 0.652783 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.23, and perfScore=0.0954732]
	                 	StringBuilder is FASTER

Test Simple c_str() test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.184 secs, and comparison 11.505 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.0287]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.64
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.83223 secs, and comparison 4.98149 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.2, and perfScore=0.636024]
	                 	Sequence<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.24
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.81617 secs, and comparison 1.9111 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.33, and perfScore=0.244506]
	                 	Sequence<string> is FASTER

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	4.8
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.52228 secs, and comparison 36.4563 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 6, and perfScore=4.84644]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence_Array<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_Array<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.64
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.51336 secs, and comparison 4.83955 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.8, and perfScore=0.644126]
	                 	Sequence_Array<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence_stdvector<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_stdvector<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.99
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.50974 secs, and comparison 7.40048 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.4, and perfScore=0.985451]
	                 	Sequence_stdvector<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.41
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.89807 secs, and comparison 3.23891 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.410089]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection<int> basics (vector<int> vs Collection<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	4.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.03848 secs, and comparison 34.0275 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 4.4, and perfScore=4.23307]
	                 	Collection<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Collection<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.39
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.93949 secs, and comparison 3.13394 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.394728]
	                 	Collection<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_LinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_LinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.39
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.99703 secs, and comparison 3.14658 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.393469]
	                 	Collection_LinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdforward_list<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdforward_list<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.85884 secs, and comparison 3.15314 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.401222]
	                 	Collection_stdforward_list<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.59
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.89288 secs, and comparison 4.66224 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=0.590689]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics with rnd strings (vector<string> vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.92
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.47511 secs, and comparison 7.80917 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=0.921424]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string> is FASTER

Test std::set<int> vs Set<int> (set<int> vs Set<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.13
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 36.9797 secs, and comparison 4.85405 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.3, and perfScore=0.131263]
	                 	Set<int> is FASTER

Test String Characters::Format () (sprintf vs String Characters::Format)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.72911 secs, and comparison 8.84451 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=1.54378]
	                 	String Characters::Format is ***SLOWER***

Test BLOB versus vector<byte> (vector<byte> vs BLOB)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.44
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 5.81505 secs, and comparison 2.57118 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.55, and perfScore=0.442159]
	                 	BLOB is FASTER

Test Test_JSONReadWriteFile (15.000000 seconds vs Test_JSONReadWriteFile)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.038
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 0.568143 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.1, and perfScore=0.0378762]
	                 	Test_JSONReadWriteFile is FASTER

Test Test_Optional_ (15.000000 seconds vs Test_Optional_)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.18
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 2.65656 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.177104]
	                 	Test_Optional_ is FASTER

Test UTF82WString win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.9
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.52841 secs, and comparison 12.4275 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2, and perfScore=1.90361]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

Test WString2UTF8 win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.92215 secs, and comparison 14.1167 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 3.6, and perfScore=2.03935]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

[[[Tests took: 11 minutes, 37 seconds]]]

Succeeded
