Performance score 1.0 means both sides equal (ratio), and tests setup so lower is generally better

[[[Started testing at: Fri Jul 22 2:4:46 2022]]]

Using TIME MULTIPLIER: 15

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v shared_ptr copy) (mutex vs shared_ptr<> copy)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.59
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.48319 secs, and comparison 4.3829 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.585699]
	                 	shared_ptr<> copy is FASTER

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v SpinLock) (mutex vs SpinLock)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.37
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.58147 secs, and comparison 2.77618 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.366179]
	                 	SpinLock is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.81
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.52669 secs, and comparison 7.74703 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.05, and perfScore=0.813192]
	                 	SharedPtr is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr (make_shared) versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.32828 secs, and comparison 7.88934 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.15, and perfScore=1.07656]
	                 	SharedPtr is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.24
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.49838 secs, and comparison 2.30493 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.48, and perfScore=0.242666]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying2 (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.29
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.28237 secs, and comparison 2.73073 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.57, and perfScore=0.294185]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple String append test (+='string object') 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.1918 secs, and comparison 22.0793 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.16637]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.405 secs, and comparison 22.8927 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.20016]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 100x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	16
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.49592 secs, and comparison 150.228 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 24, and perfScore=15.8202]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test String a + b (wstring vs String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.96914 secs, and comparison 11.1738 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.7, and perfScore=1.40213]
	                 	String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream << test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.99
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.33064 secs, and comparison 9.26652 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=0.993129]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test String::substr() (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.0671 secs, and comparison 13.2038 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.1, and perfScore=1.45624]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream versus BasicTextOutputStream (wstringstream vs MemoryStream<Characters::Character>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.8
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.8312 secs, and comparison 8.65942 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.6, and perfScore=0.799491]
	                 	MemoryStream<Characters::Character> is FASTER

Test wstringstream versus StringBuilder (wstringstream vs StringBuilder)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.12
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.47 secs, and comparison 1.36934 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.23, and perfScore=0.119385]
	                 	StringBuilder is FASTER

Test Simple c_str() test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.3356 secs, and comparison 13.909 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.043]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.71
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.1358 secs, and comparison 7.86722 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.2, and perfScore=0.70648]
	                 	Sequence<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.26
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.25875 secs, and comparison 1.8683 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.33, and perfScore=0.257386]
	                 	Sequence<string> is FASTER

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	3.7
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.6116 secs, and comparison 39.3406 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 6, and perfScore=3.70732]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence_Array<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_Array<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.55
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.2936 secs, and comparison 5.70958 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.8, and perfScore=0.554672]
	                 	Sequence_Array<int> is FASTER

Test Sequence_stdvector<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_stdvector<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.4039 secs, and comparison 10.9367 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.4, and perfScore=1.05121]
	                 	Sequence_stdvector<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.52
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.72766 secs, and comparison 3.50044 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.520305]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection<int> basics (vector<int> vs Collection<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	3.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.6888 secs, and comparison 36.8192 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 4.4, and perfScore=3.44464]
	                 	Collection<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Collection<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.51
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.8304 secs, and comparison 3.44958 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.505034]
	                 	Collection<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_LinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_LinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.51
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.85432 secs, and comparison 3.4651 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.505536]
	                 	Collection_LinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdforward_list<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdforward_list<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.51
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 6.84063 secs, and comparison 3.50266 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.512038]
	                 	Collection_stdforward_list<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.72
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.08301 secs, and comparison 5.06806 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=0.715523]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string> is FASTER

Test Collection_stdmultiset<string> basics with rnd strings (vector<string> vs Collection_stdmultiset<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 7.36497 secs, and comparison 9.07409 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.23206]
	                 	Collection_stdmultiset<string> is ***SLOWER***

Test std::set<int> vs Set<int> (set<int> vs Set<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.12
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 50.6939 secs, and comparison 6.22881 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.3, and perfScore=0.122871]
	                 	Set<int> is FASTER

Test String Characters::Format () (sprintf vs String Characters::Format)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.58396 secs, and comparison 13.0484 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=1.36148]
	                 	String Characters::Format is ***SLOWER***

Test BLOB versus vector<byte> (vector<byte> vs BLOB)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.38
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.01981 secs, and comparison 3.0355 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.55, and perfScore=0.3785]
	                 	BLOB is FASTER

Test Test_JSONReadWriteFile (15.000000 seconds vs Test_JSONReadWriteFile)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.056
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 0.845515 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.1, and perfScore=0.0563677]
	                 	Test_JSONReadWriteFile is FASTER

Test Test_Optional_ (15.000000 seconds vs Test_Optional_)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 3.05893 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.203929]
	                 	Test_Optional_ is FASTER

Test UTF82WString win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.37659 secs, and comparison 13.9727 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2, and perfScore=1.49016]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

Test WString2UTF8 win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.9
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.596 secs, and comparison 30.2463 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 3.6, and perfScore=2.85451]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

[[[Tests took: 13 minutes, 37 seconds]]]

Succeeded
