Performance score 1.0 means both sides equal (ratio), and tests setup so lower is generally better

[[[Started testing at: Mon Nov 25 5:27:44 2019]]]

Using TIME MULTIPLIER: 15

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v shared_ptr copy) (mutex vs shared_ptr<> copy)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.75
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.2502 secs, and comparison 9.89109 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.62, and perfScore=0.746487]
	                 	shared_ptr<> copy is FASTER

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v SpinLock) (mutex vs SpinLock)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.52
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.9641 secs, and comparison 6.76865 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.522106]
	                 	SpinLock is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.97
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15.5059 secs, and comparison 15.0951 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.05, and perfScore=0.973507]
	                 	SharedPtr is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.57
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15.0407 secs, and comparison 8.61019 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.48, and perfScore=0.572458]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying2 (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.69
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 14.3618 secs, and comparison 9.97199 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.55, and perfScore=0.694343]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple String append test (+='string object') 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	3.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.8485 secs, and comparison 41.3476 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=3.21809]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	3.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.8922 secs, and comparison 44.7642 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=3.22225]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 100x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	11
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15.4016 secs, and comparison 173.063 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 9.7, and perfScore=11.2367]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test String a + b (wstring vs String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 16.0417 secs, and comparison 22.544 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.6, and perfScore=1.40533]
	                 	String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream << test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.95
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 16.8112 secs, and comparison 15.9528 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=0.948938]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test String::substr() (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.6
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.0945 secs, and comparison 26.2306 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.1, and perfScore=2.59849]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream versus BasicTextOutputStream (wstringstream vs MemoryStream<Characters::Character>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.72
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15.6079 secs, and comparison 11.2874 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=0.723183]
	                 	MemoryStream<Characters::Character> is FASTER

Test wstringstream versus StringBuilder (wstringstream vs StringBuilder)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.44
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.8692 secs, and comparison 5.69788 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.18, and perfScore=0.442754]
	                 	StringBuilder is FASTER

Test Simple c_str() test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.683 secs, and comparison 13.8284 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.18364]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.90531 secs, and comparison 22.4997 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.2, and perfScore=2.52655]
	                 	Sequence<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.098
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 43.0759 secs, and comparison 4.2261 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.33, and perfScore=0.0981082]
	                 	Sequence<string> is FASTER

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	9.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.57846 secs, and comparison 88.7548 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 6, and perfScore=9.26608]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.29
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 30.3506 secs, and comparison 8.87584 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.292444]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection<int> basics (vector<int> vs Collection<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15.7664 secs, and comparison 79.4025 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 4.4, and perfScore=5.0362]
	                 	Collection<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Collection<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.24
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 18.2371 secs, and comparison 4.37728 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.240021]
	                 	Collection<string> is FASTER

Test String Chracters::Format () (sprintf vs String Characters::Format)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.8322 secs, and comparison 17.8221 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=1.28845]
	                 	String Characters::Format is ***SLOWER***

Test BLOB versus vector<byte> (vector<byte> vs BLOB)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.27
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.469 secs, and comparison 3.39785 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.55, and perfScore=0.272503]
	                 	BLOB is FASTER

Test Test_JSONReadWriteFile (15.000000 seconds vs Test_JSONReadWriteFile)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.11
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 1.69692 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.25, and perfScore=0.113128]
	                 	Test_JSONReadWriteFile is FASTER

Test Test_Optional_ (15.000000 seconds vs Test_Optional_)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 4.56953 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.304635]
	                 	Test_Optional_ is FASTER

[[[Tests took: 16 minutes, 30 seconds]]]

Succeeded
