Performance score 1.0 means both sides equal (ratio), and tests setup so lower is generally better

[[[Started testing at: Sun Sep  6 :10:27 2020]]]

Using TIME MULTIPLIER: 15

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v shared_ptr copy) (mutex vs shared_ptr<> copy)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.81
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.27409 secs, and comparison 7.50025 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.62, and perfScore=0.808732]
	                 	shared_ptr<> copy is FASTER

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v SpinLock) (mutex vs SpinLock)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.48
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.48877 secs, and comparison 4.59195 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.483935]
	                 	SpinLock is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.73
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 17.7711 secs, and comparison 13.0454 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.05, and perfScore=0.734084]
	                 	SharedPtr is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.16
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 40.1958 secs, and comparison 6.27572 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.48, and perfScore=0.156129]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying2 (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.15
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 40.7835 secs, and comparison 6.28796 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.57, and perfScore=0.154179]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple String append test (+='string object') 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 27.9085 secs, and comparison 69.8134 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.50151]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 31.7827 secs, and comparison 73.1494 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.9, and perfScore=2.30155]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 100x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	9.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 22.2097 secs, and comparison 207.372 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 9.7, and perfScore=9.33699]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test String a + b (wstring vs String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 27.9082 secs, and comparison 35.7437 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.6, and perfScore=1.28076]
	                 	String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream << test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.74
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.3253 secs, and comparison 7.67677 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=0.74349]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test String::substr() (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.5
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 17.0667 secs, and comparison 41.8491 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.1, and perfScore=2.45209]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream versus BasicTextOutputStream (wstringstream vs MemoryStream<Characters::Character>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.55
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 14.3311 secs, and comparison 7.86768 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=0.548994]
	                 	MemoryStream<Characters::Character> is FASTER

Test wstringstream versus StringBuilder (wstringstream vs StringBuilder)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.15
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15.6403 secs, and comparison 2.34569 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.23, and perfScore=0.149977]
	                 	StringBuilder is FASTER

Test Simple c_str() test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 23.8765 secs, and comparison 24.7943 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.3, and perfScore=1.03844]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.6868 secs, and comparison 15.3304 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.2, and perfScore=1.12009]
	                 	Sequence<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15.2509 secs, and comparison 3.01116 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.33, and perfScore=0.197442]
	                 	Sequence<string> is FASTER

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	4.6
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.3032 secs, and comparison 61.4596 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 6, and perfScore=4.6199]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.31
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 16.9746 secs, and comparison 5.33265 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.314154]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection<int> basics (vector<int> vs Collection<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	3.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 16.2367 secs, and comparison 54.8567 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 4.4, and perfScore=3.37856]
	                 	Collection<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Collection<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.36
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 14.8945 secs, and comparison 5.30524 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.6, and perfScore=0.356188]
	                 	Collection<string> is FASTER

Test String Chracters::Format () (sprintf vs String Characters::Format)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.3
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 39.8928 secs, and comparison 53.8342 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.5, and perfScore=1.34947]
	                 	String Characters::Format is ***SLOWER***

Test BLOB versus vector<byte> (vector<byte> vs BLOB)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.79
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 8.85816 secs, and comparison 6.9703 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.55, and perfScore=0.78688]
	                 	BLOB is FASTER

Test Test_JSONReadWriteFile (15.000000 seconds vs Test_JSONReadWriteFile)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.49
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 7.28316 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.25, and perfScore=0.485544]
	                 	Test_JSONReadWriteFile is FASTER

Test Test_Optional_ (15.000000 seconds vs Test_Optional_)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.26
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 3.96857 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.264572]
	                 	Test_Optional_ is FASTER

[[[Tests took: 19 minutes, 44 seconds]]]

Succeeded
