Performance score 1.0 means both sides equal (ratio), and tests setup so lower is generally better

[[[Started testing at: 3/15/17 11:36:05]]]

Using TIME MULTIPLIER: 15

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v shared_ptr copy) (mutex vs shared_ptr<> copy)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.56
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.3865 secs, and comparison 5.83024 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.62, and perfScore=0.561329]
	                 	shared_ptr<> copy is FASTER

Test Test of simple locking strategies (mutex v SpinLock) (mutex vs SpinLock)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.42
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.4257 secs, and comparison 4.40975 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.65, and perfScore=0.422967]
	                 	SpinLock is FASTER

Test std::shared_ptr versus Memory::SharedPtr (shared_ptr vs SharedPtr)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.87
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 13.8274 secs, and comparison 12.0249 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1, and perfScore=0.869641]
	                 	SharedPtr is FASTER

Test IRunnable versus std::function (IRunnable vs std::function)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.98
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15.1618 secs, and comparison 14.7839 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.15, and perfScore=0.975077]
	                 	std::function is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.33
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 10.1403 secs, and comparison 3.33948 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.5, and perfScore=0.329327]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple Struct With Strings Filling And Copying2 (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.41
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 12.6299 secs, and comparison 5.22601 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.68, and perfScore=0.413781]
	                 	Charactes::String is FASTER

Test Simple String append test (+='string object') 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.7
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15.1783 secs, and comparison 41.3455 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 4.3, and perfScore=2.72399]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 10x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	2.9
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 14.5834 secs, and comparison 41.7718 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 4, and perfScore=2.86434]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Simple String append test (+=wchar_t[]) 100x (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	9.9
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 11.8679 secs, and comparison 117.928 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 10.4, and perfScore=9.93679]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test String a + b (wstring vs String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.6
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15.8535 secs, and comparison 24.7301 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 3.2, and perfScore=1.55992]
	                 	String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream << test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 18.6937 secs, and comparison 25.7193 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.8, and perfScore=1.37583]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test String::substr() (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.8
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 17.5774 secs, and comparison 31.7898 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.8, and perfScore=1.80856]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream versus BasicTextOutputStream (wstringstream vs MemoryStream<Characters::Character>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	3.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 17.1489 secs, and comparison 52.457 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 3.3, and perfScore=3.05891]
	                 	MemoryStream<Characters::Character> is ***SLOWER***

Test wstringstream versus StringBuilder (wstringstream vs StringBuilder)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.21
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 17.5232 secs, and comparison 3.6172 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.25, and perfScore=0.206424]
	                 	StringBuilder is FASTER

Test Simple c_str() test (wstring vs Charactes::String)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 18.022 secs, and comparison 21.4611 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.25, and perfScore=1.19083]
	                 	Charactes::String is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	3.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 20.1429 secs, and comparison 63.7924 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 7.7, and perfScore=3.16699]
	                 	Sequence<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.43
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 17.3308 secs, and comparison 7.46239 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.55, and perfScore=0.430585]
	                 	Sequence<string> is FASTER

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> basics (vector<int> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	3.1
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 20.2797 secs, and comparison 61.9413 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 7.7, and perfScore=3.05435]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> basics (vector<string> vs Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.39
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 17.2196 secs, and comparison 6.67801 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.4, and perfScore=0.387813]
	                 	Sequence_DoublyLinkedList<string> is FASTER

Test Collection<int> basics (vector<int> vs Collection<int>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	4.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 17.3276 secs, and comparison 73.1376 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 7.9, and perfScore=4.22087]
	                 	Collection<int> is ***SLOWER***

Test Collection<string> basics (vector<string> vs Collection<string>)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.59
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 14.3749 secs, and comparison 8.43429 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.8, and perfScore=0.586738]
	                 	Collection<string> is FASTER

Test String Chracters::Format () (sprintf vs String Characters::Format)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.2
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 14.1646 secs, and comparison 17.5124 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.7, and perfScore=1.23636]
	                 	String Characters::Format is ***SLOWER***

Test BLOB versus vector<Byte> (vector<Byte> vs BLOB)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.43
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 9.64383 secs, and comparison 4.13285 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.55, and perfScore=0.428548]
	                 	BLOB is FASTER

Test Test_JSONReadWriteFile (15.000000 seconds vs Test_JSONReadWriteFile)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.16
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 2.37647 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 0.4, and perfScore=0.158431]
	                 	Test_JSONReadWriteFile is FASTER

Test Test_Optional_ (15.000000 seconds vs Test_Optional_)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	0.36
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 15 secs, and comparison 5.43001 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 1.1, and perfScore=0.362001]
	                 	Test_Optional_ is FASTER

Test UTF82WString win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.4
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 16.6946 secs, and comparison 22.6766 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.4, and perfScore=1.35832]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

Test WString2UTF8 win32API vs codecvt_utf8 (win32API vs codecvt_utf8)
	PERFORMANCE_SCORE	1.7
	DETAILS:         	[baseline test 16.3702 secs, and comparison 28.4721 sec, and warnIfPerfScore > 2.8, and perfScore=1.73926]
	                 	codecvt_utf8 is ***SLOWER***

[[[Tests took: 18 minutes, 23 seconds]]]

Succeeded
