#### A Basic Explanation of IJEGU

This is the basic proposal of IJEGU:

- Step 1: Do the best you can to always make everything the best for everyone
- Step 2: Whenever mistakes are made, recognize them
- Loop

This is not a passive process. Actively apply the intent while constantly aspiring to apply the intent successfully to achieve the greatest effect for everyone, everywhere via everything.

For example:

- Everyone does the best they can to make things best for themselves and others in court. 
- But sometimes a judgment is noticed as potentially contradicting the intent of doing the best to make things best for everyone.
- Then a higher court has to meet to look at it.
- And they might overturn it, changing the system in the future, accepting a mistake.

Since the meta system is there, everything can be seen as the normal functioning of the system itself.

Similarly, with IJEGU, this is an instance of IJEGU and also IJEGU itself works that way. If you understand what it is but it isnt fully explained correctly all you have to do is map onto its ontology and you can expand it... and that is an expression of IJEGU, itself. On the other hand, if IJEGU is not understood, someone realizes they dont understand it, and then decides not to try to understand it, then that is an instance of implicit injustice and IJEGU also accounts for that, and it is an instance of IJEGU's proof (through being an instance of II), and we know the solution to it is more instantiations from IJEGU... So, if a court is suspected to have acted wrongly, an argument is provided, and it is ignored, we know that is another further instance of II. The more people can recognize it, the more likely EG is to occur.
